At age 34 Bernard Hopkins had a record of 35-2-1 1 NC
Collapse
-
You're a Hopkins fan and you're going to agree with the notion that he was not criticized for not going up in weight, not really getting any credit because of constantly being compared to RJJ and until the Tito win and his later fights, that Hopkins was really starting to get appreciated?
You're agreeing that this never happened?Comment
-
Correct me if I'm wrong, but your whole argument was that none of the fights @ SMW were desirable for Hopkins. It's the same exact thing with Golovkin right now. It's either unproven kids or Froch/Ward leftovers. And half of them are with Haymon.
Btw - welcome to the real world. Finances matter.Comment
-
Did I sleep with your sister or something? Why so hostile?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but your whole argument was that none of the fights @ SMW were desirable for Hopkins. It's the same exact thing with Golovkin right now. It's either unproven kids or Froch/Ward leftovers. And half of them are with Haymon.
Btw - welcome to the real world. Finances matter.Comment
-
Ok. This is a good thread idea but I thing you failed to put some things into perspective.
This issue is, if Hopkins were to move to 168, what challenges in that division await him and are those desirable fights that build upon his legacy. So you're in 1997 right now. The 168 rankings were as follows:
Frankie Liles
Robin Reid
Charles Brewer
Joe Calzaghe
Herol Graham
Vincenzo Nardiello
Thulani Malinga
Thomas Tate
Chris Eubank
Joseph Kiwanuka
At that particular time, I don't see a single fight that is desirable. Joe Calzaghe is a recognizable name but this is 1997. He wasn't the established product he went on to become at that point in time.
So I think with Hopkins, my answer is no. I wouldn't have demanded a move to a new division because there were no fights that intrigued me.
Golovkin vs Ward, Ramirez, Froch, DeGale are all intriguing fights to me.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but your whole argument was that none of the fights @ SMW were desirable for Hopkins. It's the same exact thing with Golovkin right now. It's either unproven kids or Froch/Ward leftovers. And half of them are with Haymon.Comment
-
-
With respect to Golovkin, I explained that there are a few fights at 168 that would've intrigued me over the past couple years:
Ward- who is no longer at the weight anymore
Froch - retired
DeGale - which is a damn good fight
Ramirez - which looks to be a nice option on Deck
But you, being a sensitive obsessed Golovkin fan, took this as me, insulting the love of your life by saying that 168 is a strong division that he is avoiding.
And that's why I'm being hostile. You mistook me for listing 4 SMWs that I would like to see GGG fight as stating that 168 is a strong division.Comment
-
I do remember that near the end of his mw run...around the time of the talks of a toney fight as well. He was viewed to be running out of opponents at mw. He got tons of hate for the dlh fight.Comment
-
Ok. This is a good thread idea but I thing you failed to put some things into perspective.
This issue is, if Hopkins were to move to 168, what challenges in that division await him and are those desirable fights that build upon his legacy. So you're in 1997 right now. The 168 rankings were as follows:
Frankie Liles
Robin Reid
Charles Brewer
Joe Calzaghe
Herol Graham
Vincenzo Nardiello
Thulani Malinga
Thomas Tate
Chris Eubank
Joseph Kiwanuka
At that particular time, I don't see a single fight that is desirable. Joe Calzaghe is a recognizable name but this is 1997. He wasn't the established product he went on to become at that point in time.
So I think with Hopkins, my answer is no. I wouldn't have demanded a move to a new division because there were no fights that intrigued me.
Golovkin vs Ward, Ramirez, Froch, DeGale are all intriguing fights to me.Comment
-
Hopkins was universally despised toward the end of his run. Much like golovkin will be after Canelo.Comment
Comment