What did Joseph Parker do that's better than Hughie Fury?

[Fury4daWIN]

Well didn't he weigh in at 270 lbs against Chisora the second time?

Ah come on. That's rubbish, especially in comparison to someone as basic and bland as Carlos Takam.

Takam might be bland and basic, but he's a solid proven fighter. That can't be denied.

And Whyte's hardly Mr Flamboyant himself, is he?

[mlac]

Laced up DKSAB. Takam is a legit top 10 heavyweight.

[Fury4daWIN]

Laced up DKSAB. Takam is a legit top 10 heavyweight.

He absolutely is. He's one of the few top tenners who've really earner their place on the list through grit and hard work. He has very little else behind him. If he gets knocked off by Parker then it is what it is, but until then he needs his props.

[denium]

Takam is a decent fighter, just below top 10 imo. Very nice win for Parker and props to him if he gets through him. I also respect him for taking the fight.

Takam is better than anyone Wilder has ever fought.

[LacedUp]

Takam is significantly better than anyone on Hughie's resume to date.

Stop hating on the man. He's a solid fighter who got where he is through hard work and dedication.

And where did I say he wasn't?

[LacedUp]

Beating TT is better than anything Whyte or Martin have done, by a long chalk. Plus, Takam's had competitive showings against Perez (argument that he won that one) and Povetkin. Yes, he's proven, far more so than Martin or Whyte.

If either man surpasses him in their careers then I'll reassess my opinions. But until then, the onus is on them to prove themselves.

Perez is a fat cuban bum.

Takam went 10 rounds with Povetkin in a cagey affair. Wupti do, Marco Huck beat Povetkin ffs. Nobody's running around saying Glowacki is better than Takam.

[LacedUp]

Laced up DKSAB. Takam is a legit top 10 heavyweight.

Haha he most definitely is not

He's fringe top 10 at best.

[Fury4daWIN]

Perez is a fat cuban bum.

Takam went 10 rounds with Povetkin in a cagey affair. Wupti do, Marco Huck beat Povetkin ffs. Nobody's running around saying Glowacki is better than Takam.

Again, what has Whyte or Martin done that's better than that? So far as I can see eff all.

[LacedUp]

How do you determine that his skills are better? Who has he fought that demonstrates that? Takam's fought one of the most proven guys in the division in Povetkin, and been very competitive against him. He's also beaten another solid guy in Thompson. His size is irrelevant.

Your fanboyism of Whyte is baffling.

Competitive? He fought on the back foot hiding behind the shoulder and flicked out a jab for 10 rounds. Amazing stuff!!

At least Whyte brought it to Joshua when he had his chance against a big name. threw to the body and head before getting stopped. 10 x better performance than Takam.

Thompson is a big load of crap. If you can't beat a 47 year fat retired plummer, then you're no good are you?

[( . Y . )]

Competitive? He fought on the back foot hiding behind the shoulder and flicked out a jab for 10 rounds. Amazing stuff!!

At least Whyte brought it to Joshua when he had his chance against a big name. threw to the body and head before getting stopped. 10 x better performance than Takam.

Thompson is a big load of crap. If you can't beat a 47 year fat retired plummer, then you're no good are you?

WOW, you are butthurt.

Whyte is trash.