Lacedup just got KTFO
What did Joseph Parker do that's better than Hughie Fury?
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Im beginning to wonder if you can't read like you're idol larry.
' and yes they were old and shot' is clearly there for all to see old boy.
He said he ' didnt know any names ' on parkers record.
So i pointed out several names that practically every non-casual boxing fan knows of..Comment
-
those names do not add to resume at all.....no need for insults at all, we are just talking boxing hereIm beginning to wonder if you can't read like you're idol larry.
' and yes they were old and shot' is clearly there for all to see old boy.
He said he ' didnt know any names ' on parkers record.
So i pointed out several names that practically every non-casual boxing fan knows of..Comment
-
Comment
-
Resume-wise both Hughie's and Parker's seem about the same. Parker though, has been winning his fights in impressive fashion. He's explosive, powerful and has been blitzing his opponents. Fury has been winning hoe hum decisions. That's the difference.Comment
-
Fury hasn't lost a round in his career almost.Comment
-
Obviously I was discussing the supposed 'war' they were in. Discussing competitiveness in such a cagey affair is laughable, which I said. I stated throughout the thread that Povetkin was walking forward but was ineffective whilst takam was fighting off the back foot behind the shoulderroll.
At no point did I say Takam got steamrolled.Comment
-
I agree with this, it is not just about who you face but the way you defeat your opponents. Compared to Joseph Parker Hughie Fury has looked decidedly pedestrian thus far.Comment
Comment