Do you still rank Bradley as the #2 ww?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Boxfan83
    The Coach
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Feb 2015
    • 15842
    • 2,101
    • 732
    • 160,371

    #1

    Do you still rank Bradley as the #2 ww?

    Losing to Manny Pacquiao isn't really a reason to take a huge drop in the rankings but prior to Brandon Rios Tim had/has been getting caught a lot, not to mention Pac dropped him twice which he wasnt able to before. Personally I think Bradley is still #2 but any fine performance by a top 5 guy (Brook, Garcia, Vargas, Thruman, Porter) can kick him out of that spot. With that said, do you think Bradley is #2 at ww? If not where do you put him?? And who do you think is #2???
  • eco1
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Nov 2015
    • 10098
    • 1,760
    • 8,649
    • 71,221

    #2
    I always said i think Bradley is overrated.

    Comment

    • The Big Dunn
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Sep 2009
      • 70234
      • 9,924
      • 8,201
      • 287,568

      #3
      I thought you could make a case that Thurman and Brook could've been ahead of Manny and/or Tim. As of now, I think tim falls to 3 behind Thurman and Brook.

      Comment

      • DreamerUSA
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Feb 2015
        • 2302
        • 171
        • 40
        • 32,933

        #4
        Originally posted by Boxfan83
        Losing to Manny Pacquiao isn't really a reason to take a huge drop in the rankings but prior to Brandon Rios Tim had/has been getting caught a lot, not to mention Pac dropped him twice which he wasnt able to before. Personally I think Bradley is still #2 but any fine performance by a top 5 guy (Brook, Garcia, Vargas, Thruman, Porter) can kick him out of that spot. With that said, do you think Bradley is #2 at ww? If not where do you put him?? And who do you think is #2???
        Anywhere from #1-#3 is fine imo. Brook is the only guy in the division that I think flat out beats Bradley. Thurman I'm back and forth on as of late, I'll know more after the Porter fight. Bradley beats anyone else in the division imo, right now.

        Comment

        • Larry the boss
          EDUCATED
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jan 2011
          • 90798
          • 6,419
          • 4,473
          • 2,500,480

          #5
          No and he should not have been ranked #2 in the 1st place imo..he doesnt even fight true ww's..look at the ww rankings and tell me who he has fought on there

          Comment

          • FrankieClutch
            OTSC
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • May 2009
            • 6084
            • 177
            • 396
            • 26,671

            #6
            I still do. Brook and Thurman would be my 3 and 4 assuming Pacquiao is at 1

            Comment

            • MoneyMayFan
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Oct 2008
              • 1917
              • 66
              • 8
              • 13,196

              #7
              O plz. Only idiots like skip bayless think bradley is elite. That fool called tim bradley "iron jaw" lmao. Jesse vargas disagrees

              Comment

              • mathed
                molṑn labé
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2009
                • 54551
                • 2,742
                • 2,984
                • 224,675

                #8
                Originally posted by The Big Dunn
                I thought you could make a case that Thurman and Brook could've been ahead of Manny and/or Tim. As of now, I think tim falls to 3 behind Thurman and Brook.
                Why, how? Brook only beat Porter like two years ago and has done nothing since. Thurman has beaten a bunch of old dudes and Chaves, which is his best win to date. He has been avoiding the Porter fight for over a year because it will be the first live body he will have faced since Chaves.

                Bradley's draw with Chaves was a joke and his only losses have come against Pac.. You think either Thurman or Brook could hang with Pac? I don't, I think he embarrasses both of them.

                Comment

                • SplitSecond
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Nov 2009
                  • 23151
                  • 1,715
                  • 1,187
                  • 85,044

                  #9
                  Yea. Till one of these other guys does something. Losing to Pacquiao doesn't mean much, Bradley has been around awhile and beating Marquez right after the Pacquiao fight is still one of the best wins at the weight.

                  Comment

                  • gmc_rfc_06
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Oct 2010
                    • 9486
                    • 282
                    • 131
                    • 16,947

                    #10
                    Never did.

                    Brook and Pac are the two best fighters at 147, we'll see what happens with Thurman/Porter also.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP