Hauser makes himself look ******...

[SilverMiles]

Which is exactly why people are criticizing this 'investigation'. There's really no 'there' there. It is just a regurgitation of a bunch known things with a hint of HBO/Ring Magazine mouthpiece added saltiness.

But how do you know, the series isn't completed yet. You have fanboys calling him a hack when the article is well written and has pointed out some interesting facts.

It's a story that building up to a climax, he's laying the ground work because as a writer you can't assume everyone knows what's going on.

[PKing]

But how do you know, the series isn't completed yet. You have fanboys calling him a hack when the article is well written and has pointed out some interesting facts.

It's a story that building up to a climax, he's laying the ground work because as a writer you can't assume everyone knows what's going on.

He is using a very classic disinformation style... 90% fact/10% ommitted.

Brewster is not struggling financially. That's well known. He is still employed by Haymon to this day... https://********/Xw7BfsrgGTQ

[Jsmooth9876]

If this Hauser guy wrote an article claiming Pacman used PED all the same guys in here criticizing him would be blowing him like a crack whore looking for a fix..

Typical for NSB though...

[gee73]

He is using a very classic disinformation style... 90% fact/10% ommitted.

Brewster is not struggling financially. That's well known. He is still employed by Haymon to this day... https://********/Xw7BfsrgGTQ

Yeah, last I heard Brewster is doing very good after his retirement. But Hauser is a n***a hater, so Brewster has to be broke accordingly...

[Lester Tutor]

If this Hauser guy wrote an article claiming Pacman used PED all the same guys in here criticizing him would be blowing him like a crack whore looking for a fix..

Typical for NSB though...

We don't need Hauser for that. We can just go direct to the source whom Hauser likes to publicize as the expert on PEDS with his ''Can Boxing Trust USADA?'' article, Victor Conte.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKEQfjowW_Y&t=1m03s

[PKing]

Yeah, last I heard Brewster is doing very good after his retirement. But Hauser is a n***a hater, so Brewster has to be broke accordingly...

I don't know about the racist part but the willful ommitence of Brewster still making a living with Haymon is VERY telling.

[gee73]

I don't know about the racist part but the willful ommitence of Brewster still making a living with Haymon is VERY telling.

Well, I don't really want to discredit him as a racist but the only positive thing I've read from Hauser about a black boxer was that Bradley didn't lose the 7th round in his first fight against Pacquiao...

[Lester Tutor]

I don't know about the racist part but the willful ommitence of Brewster still making a living with Haymon is VERY telling.

Nah Hauser is a racist. In the articles written about Floyd he chooses over saturated sharpened photos of Floyd, purposely done in photoshop and bulbous framing like they would depict blacks in the 40's. If anyhow has played in photoshop or has taken pictures with DSLRs, you know what to do when achieving over sharpening effects...

[Lester Tutor]

[Dosumpthin]

His series on Haymon really hasn't answered the questions that we have but he has not been unfair to the man. It seems as though he just can't get anyone from Haymon's team to speak to him (not surprising).

His series on the whole USADA thing last year was excellent work. It is pathetic that many posters on this board bashed him relentlessly for it...and for what? to protect mayweather? usada? Haymon? the nevada commission? Which one of these idiots here actually benefits from the aforementioned parties?

Boxing writers in general are lazy..and most of them are bad writers. Hauser is actually a quality writer. With a sport as corrupt as we all acknowledge boxing is, why aren't more writers doing investigative pieces? There are all types of matters that should be looked into. Who else is actually trying besides this man?

What you call investigative journalism is what I call an editorial.


"Can boxing trust usada" was filled opinions, rumors and speculation.

"Was Floyd really dehydrated" had 10xs More questions than it had answers.

Explain how that's investigative?

Inadvertent use waiver? It takes 5 mins of me "investigating" Wada pdf file to know hauser doesn't know what he was talking about.


"I thought It was widely reported Floyd was caught using an IV" - oopps sorry I made a mistake.


Investigate a rumor, report the facts. That's journalism.