Is Tyson Fury a better fighter than Wladimir Klitschko?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sunny31
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Feb 2006
    • 5780
    • 450
    • 35
    • 128,703

    #61
    Originally posted by LacedUp
    Of course size mattered a great deal. Mariusz Wach is a complete stiff idiot. It's ****** to even compare him to Fury.
    I hate when people (Klitschko fans) bring up Wach. He is C class on a good day, and he still wobbled Wlad at one stage. He is not a good fighter, and there is a thread on here where all the Klitschko fans were insinuating that Wach was actually better than Fury thus it would be an easy fight. You have to laugh at this ****.

    Comment

    • ShoulderRoll
      Join The Great Resist
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2009
      • 56391
      • 10,205
      • 5,035
      • 763,445

      #62
      Yes, he proved it in the ring against Klitschko head to head.

      Comment

      • sunny31
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Feb 2006
        • 5780
        • 450
        • 35
        • 128,703

        #63
        Ill tell you guys what Wladimir's best quality is in terms of this match up and in general in a historical sense. He carries the knockout power to take out any heavyweight in history in my opinion, or at least the power to turn the fight in his direction at any stage. To me that is one of his best qualities, it makes him dangerous and a problem for any heavyweight in history, including Fury. But for me Fury is just a bad style match up for him at any stage of his career you would see him struggle like he did in their first fight. Lets see how the rematch goes.

        Comment

        • LacedUp
          Still Smokin'
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Oct 2009
          • 29171
          • 781
          • 381
          • 132,163

          #64
          Originally posted by sunny31
          Ill tell you guys what Wladimir's best quality is in terms of this match up and in general in a historical sense. He carries the knockout power to take out any heavyweight in history in my opinion, or at least the power to turn the fight in his direction at any stage. To me that is one of his best qualities, it makes him dangerous and a problem for any heavyweight in history, including Fury. But for me Fury is just a bad style match up for him at any stage of his career you would see him struggle like he did in their first fight. Lets see how the rematch goes.
          If Fury's is smart, he'll go out and do exactly what he did in the first couple of rounds of the first fight. Make Wlad remember.

          After that, the fight is won.

          Comment

          • LacedUp
            Still Smokin'
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2009
            • 29171
            • 781
            • 381
            • 132,163

            #65
            Originally posted by Weltschmerz
            Sigged
            Alright, good luck mate

            Comment

            • sunny31
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Feb 2006
              • 5780
              • 450
              • 35
              • 128,703

              #66
              Originally posted by LacedUp
              If Fury's is smart, he'll go out and do exactly what he did in the first couple of rounds of the first fight. Make Wlad remember.

              After that, the fight is won.
              Yep like the Marquez effect on Pacquiao. Wlad will need to be more aggressive to change the pattern.

              Comment

              • soul_survivor
                LOL @ Ali-Holmes
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jun 2013
                • 18949
                • 623
                • 473
                • 65,236

                #67
                Originally posted by LacedUp
                It definitely does not. 'is' implies current. As in: "who is the best fighter (right now)? You should have worded it differently if you wanted everyone to jump on the klitschko bandwagon.

                Wlad has proven credentials. Yes. His career is more successful than Fury's right now.

                But who is the better fighter? Fury obviously since he just took Wlad to school.



                That wasn't the question, hence totally irrelevant to this conversation.
                The question is "Is Tyson Fury a better fighter than Wladimir"? There is no time frame being put into it. Don't be ******. You know he isn't. Your posts just get worse by the day.

                Comment

                • ////
                  ////
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Sep 2014
                  • 14948
                  • 952
                  • 671
                  • 111,577

                  #68
                  Originally posted by LacedUp
                  How are they on an even playing field right now when Fury just nearly won every round in their fight? That makes zero sense.
                  Well there were like 12 punches thrown in the fight. It's not like Fury walked Wlad down and outclassed him. He just threw 8 instead of 4.

                  Comment

                  • LacedUp
                    Still Smokin'
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Oct 2009
                    • 29171
                    • 781
                    • 381
                    • 132,163

                    #69
                    Originally posted by soul_survivor
                    The question is "Is Tyson Fury a better fighter than Wladimir"? There is no time frame being put into it. Don't be ******. You know he isn't. Your posts just get worse by the day.
                    Don't call me ****** because you haven't caught up on grammar lately.

                    "third person singular present of be." - Check it out on your own time. I'm right.

                    Anyways, I'd be hard pressed to say someone who just lost 11-1 or close to it in my book is better than his conqueror.

                    Originally posted by Carnivore
                    Well there were like 12 punches thrown in the fight. It's not like Fury walked Wlad down and outclassed him. He just threw 8 instead of 4.
                    So in your own words he was double as good as Wladimir. Thanks for clearing that up.

                    Comment

                    • bojangles1987
                      bo jungle
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jul 2009
                      • 41118
                      • 1,326
                      • 357
                      • 63,028

                      #70
                      Originally posted by LacedUp
                      How are they on an even playing field right now when Fury just nearly won every round in their fight? That makes zero sense.
                      Mayweather's not better than Pacquiao now that he beat him. They're just on an even playing field.

                      I'm going to start using that a lot. It's awesome.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP