Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why do Floyd fans says the IV infusion was not illegal?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by original zero View Post
    NSAC rules list the things you CAN'T take. They don't make a list of things you CAN take
    Uh yes they do, see above.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Rath View Post
      The TUE was granted 21 days later after the fight .

      Which means at the time of the fight, the IV infusion was illegal because the TUE was not even applied for.

      The granted TUE was for the IV infusion at the time of the fight not after it because the TUE no longer serves its purpose since the fight was done and over with.
      Better question is what happened to..
      Hard work! Preparation!

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Crazylegs77 View Post
        Better question is what happened to..
        Hard work! Preparation!
        TBE

        Testosterone Below Epitestosterone *****

        Even beyond the IV this is actually the most damning piece of evidence. There is no scientific explanation how someone suffering from this condition can look like this.



        While testosterone below epitestosterone is naturally possible its associated with a severe medical condition called hyppgonadism which makes men fat and effeminate. Froid only has one of those symptoms.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by GTTofAK View Post
          Show any NSCA documentation giving a blanket approval to IVs. The very next section of the rules says what is approved and saline IVs aren't on the list.
          Originally posted by GTTofAK View Post
          Uh yes they do, see above.
          Why did you edit my paragraph to purposely mislead the community? I specifically wrote:

          "They do list *medications* you can take, but vitamin C is not a medication."

          Are you under the impression that salt, water, or vitamin C is banned by NSAC? If so, why?

          Comment


          • Originally posted by original zero View Post
            Why did you edit my paragraph to purposely mislead the community? I specifically wrote:

            "They do list *medications* you can take, but vitamin C is not a medication."

            Are you under the impression that salt, water, or vitamin C is banned by NSAC? If so, why?
            It lists drugs or injections. Its banned because the IV is an injection. You can drink all the salt water you want.

            This isn't going to get any better either. UFC is already cracking down in IV re-hydration because in weight classification sports it is cheating. Its an artificial way to negate the negative effects of cutting weight.
            Last edited by GTTofAK; 02-16-2016, 05:39 PM.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by GTTofAK View Post
              It lists drugs or injections. Its banned because the IV is an injection. You can drink all the salt water you want.
              But the NSAC says you're wrong. The NSAC said the following on a live television broadcast:

              "Mr. Mayweather has done nothing wrong. The Nevada State Athletic Commission has no interest in any type of investigation regarding his IV. He did not violate the WADA prohibited list for any type of drugs that are prohibited on that list and we have no interest in it whatsoever."

              USADA also confirmed that the IV was 100% legal under NSAC rules.

              If you think the rules should change, write a letter to the commission, but don't lie about what the rules were.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by original zero View Post
                "Mr. Mayweather has done nothing wrong. The Nevada State Athletic Commission has no interest in any type of investigation regarding his IV. He did not violate the WADA prohibited list for any type of drugs that are prohibited on that list and we have no interest in it whatsoever."
                The NSAC's word is trusted about as much as a chipotle burrito. Its not too hard to see that their written rules don't agree with what they are saying.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by GTTofAK View Post
                  The NSAC's word is trusted about as much as a chipotle burrito. Its not too hard to see that their written rules don't agree with what they are saying.
                  NSAC & USADA have both stated that IV was legal in Nevada. So now we can't trust the NSAC about what they do and don't allow? Even though we know they allowed it?

                  What alternate universe do you live in?

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Rath View Post
                    The TUE was granted 21 days later after the fight .

                    Which means at the time of the fight, the IV infusion was illegal because the TUE was not even applied for.

                    The granted TUE was for the IV infusion at the time of the fight not after it because the TUE no longer serves its purpose since the fight was done and over with.
                    Is this the most pressing issue in boxing?

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by original zero View Post
                      NSAC & USADA have both stated that IV was legal in Nevada. So now we can't trust the NSAC about what they do and don't allow? Even though we know they allowed it?
                      Their rules dont say that IVs are allowed. Were they lying then or are the lying now? There is this thing called motive to lie. The actual written rules trump any "statement" by the NSAC.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP