Why do Floyd fans says the IV infusion was not illegal?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • GTTofAK
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2008
    • 1144
    • 24
    • 1
    • 7,444

    #231
    Originally posted by original zero
    NSAC rules list the things you CAN'T take. They don't make a list of things you CAN take
    Uh yes they do, see above.

    Comment

    • Crazylegs77
      null and void
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jan 2008
      • 13101
      • 445
      • 296
      • 21,573

      #232
      Originally posted by Rath
      The TUE was granted 21 days later after the fight .

      Which means at the time of the fight, the IV infusion was illegal because the TUE was not even applied for.

      The granted TUE was for the IV infusion at the time of the fight not after it because the TUE no longer serves its purpose since the fight was done and over with.
      Better question is what happened to..
      Hard work! Preparation!

      Comment

      • GTTofAK
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jun 2008
        • 1144
        • 24
        • 1
        • 7,444

        #233
        Originally posted by Crazylegs77
        Better question is what happened to..
        Hard work! Preparation!
        TBE

        Testosterone Below Epitestosterone *****

        Even beyond the IV this is actually the most damning piece of evidence. There is no scientific explanation how someone suffering from this condition can look like this.



        While testosterone below epitestosterone is naturally possible its associated with a severe medical condition called hyppgonadism which makes men fat and effeminate. Froid only has one of those symptoms.

        Comment

        • original zero
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jan 2016
          • 2243
          • 69
          • 1
          • 9,551

          #234
          Originally posted by GTTofAK
          Show any NSCA documentation giving a blanket approval to IVs. The very next section of the rules says what is approved and saline IVs aren't on the list.
          Originally posted by GTTofAK
          Uh yes they do, see above.
          Why did you edit my paragraph to purposely mislead the community? I specifically wrote:

          "They do list *medications* you can take, but vitamin C is not a medication."

          Are you under the impression that salt, water, or vitamin C is banned by NSAC? If so, why?

          Comment

          • GTTofAK
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jun 2008
            • 1144
            • 24
            • 1
            • 7,444

            #235
            Originally posted by original zero
            Why did you edit my paragraph to purposely mislead the community? I specifically wrote:

            "They do list *medications* you can take, but vitamin C is not a medication."

            Are you under the impression that salt, water, or vitamin C is banned by NSAC? If so, why?
            It lists drugs or injections. Its banned because the IV is an injection. You can drink all the salt water you want.

            This isn't going to get any better either. UFC is already cracking down in IV re-hydration because in weight classification sports it is cheating. Its an artificial way to negate the negative effects of cutting weight.
            Last edited by GTTofAK; 02-16-2016, 05:39 PM.

            Comment

            • original zero
              Banned
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jan 2016
              • 2243
              • 69
              • 1
              • 9,551

              #236
              Originally posted by GTTofAK
              It lists drugs or injections. Its banned because the IV is an injection. You can drink all the salt water you want.
              But the NSAC says you're wrong. The NSAC said the following on a live television broadcast:

              "Mr. Mayweather has done nothing wrong. The Nevada State Athletic Commission has no interest in any type of investigation regarding his IV. He did not violate the WADA prohibited list for any type of drugs that are prohibited on that list and we have no interest in it whatsoever."

              USADA also confirmed that the IV was 100% legal under NSAC rules.

              If you think the rules should change, write a letter to the commission, but don't lie about what the rules were.

              Comment

              • GTTofAK
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jun 2008
                • 1144
                • 24
                • 1
                • 7,444

                #237
                Originally posted by original zero
                "Mr. Mayweather has done nothing wrong. The Nevada State Athletic Commission has no interest in any type of investigation regarding his IV. He did not violate the WADA prohibited list for any type of drugs that are prohibited on that list and we have no interest in it whatsoever."
                The NSAC's word is trusted about as much as a chipotle burrito. Its not too hard to see that their written rules don't agree with what they are saying.

                Comment

                • original zero
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jan 2016
                  • 2243
                  • 69
                  • 1
                  • 9,551

                  #238
                  Originally posted by GTTofAK
                  The NSAC's word is trusted about as much as a chipotle burrito. Its not too hard to see that their written rules don't agree with what they are saying.
                  NSAC & USADA have both stated that IV was legal in Nevada. So now we can't trust the NSAC about what they do and don't allow? Even though we know they allowed it?

                  What alternate universe do you live in?

                  Comment

                  • Build That Wall
                    TRUMP 2024
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • May 2012
                    • 18987
                    • 679
                    • 868
                    • 78,835

                    #239
                    Originally posted by Rath
                    The TUE was granted 21 days later after the fight .

                    Which means at the time of the fight, the IV infusion was illegal because the TUE was not even applied for.

                    The granted TUE was for the IV infusion at the time of the fight not after it because the TUE no longer serves its purpose since the fight was done and over with.
                    Is this the most pressing issue in boxing?

                    Comment

                    • GTTofAK
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jun 2008
                      • 1144
                      • 24
                      • 1
                      • 7,444

                      #240
                      Originally posted by original zero
                      NSAC & USADA have both stated that IV was legal in Nevada. So now we can't trust the NSAC about what they do and don't allow? Even though we know they allowed it?
                      Their rules dont say that IVs are allowed. Were they lying then or are the lying now? There is this thing called motive to lie. The actual written rules trump any "statement" by the NSAC.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP