who among suspected PED user got away the most: Pacquaio, Mayweather or Marquez?

[Zaroku]

I dont ****ing care. You are an alt. You are essentially trying to suicide this account anyways.

You are an alt of a boxing fan! Please drop the insults..
Please!!

Listen to me... Please!! The insults destroy your credibility!
I use Asterisk's more than I use bad words. Drop the insults and post your best logic. You seem to belong on Jerry Springer fighting over your man... More than discussing boxing!!!

Please stop! Boxing only!!
Please!! No calling people Morons, or ******!! Just facts you can substantiate about boxing!!!

[Zaroku]

I dont ****ing care. You are an alt. You are essentially trying to suicide this account anyways.

Please drop the insults!! Thank you!

[GTTofAK]

Please drop the insults!! Thank you!

There was no insult it was a statement of fact. You proved yourself to be an alt by accidentally quoting yourself. Now you are running around the forum bombing any thread you can in an account suicide.

[Spoon23]

You are bringing the action!
You need to know these things before anything!

Don't ask fans to disprove your questions.. That is not how it works!!!

I have explained this many, many times to you! Please bring your best evidence or STFU!

Lol so angry.. You're on fire Zaroku. I am merely bringing out the important red flags to extinguish to vindicate Froid.

This thread is giving you nightmares Zaroku. You should take a breather. I'm worried for your health. Take a break my friend.

[Zaroku]

There was no insult it was a statement of fact. You proved yourself to be an alt by accidentally quoting yourself. Now you are running around the forum bombing any thread you can in an account suicide.

I join threads that interest me!! Please call me an alt forever.. If you stop insulting others who don't agree with you!! It is counter productive!!!

Thanks buddy!! Do we have a deal???

[GTTofAK]

I join threads that interest me!! Please call me an alt forever.. If you stop insulting others who don't agree with you!! It is counter productive!!!

Thanks buddy!! Do we have a deal???

You jump into threads and scream unaltered 'Manny is a ****** humper' like you have turrets. You should have been banned awhile ago.

[Zaroku]

Lol so angry.. You're on fire Zaroku. I am merely bringing out the important red flags to extinguish to vindicate Froid.

Shifting the burden of proof. That is what you and I are doing. I say he cheated because I never heard of an ex post facto tue! I searched but couldn't find other ex post facto TUE. Was my search perfect or exhaustive?? No!

My gut says something stinks/red flag!!

[Zaroku]

You jump into threads and scream unaltered 'Manny is a ****** humper' like you have turrets. You should have been banned awhile ago.

Ok, my bad! Manny isn't a ******!
Let's move on! Can we stay on topic? When people start insulting each other, it is not useful! It is funny, but not effective! Let's stay on point. In this thread, agreed?? We can act ****** in Alexkid threads... Alexkid is great!!

[travestyny]

Its engilish you ****ing moron. A TUE requires that there be no acceptable medical alternative. WADA has found that for mild to moderate dehydration that drinking water is an acceptable and even morE effective alternative. Therefor no TUE.

I really wish you could read. Let me break this down for you yet again, as has already been done.

"The use of IV infusions in sport is commonly linked with rehydration after exhaustive effort, and this situation is arguably the major cause of debate. It must be understood that the use of IV fluid replacement following exercise to correct mild to moderate dehydration (1) is not clinically indicated nor substantiated by the medical literature. (2)There is a well-established body of scientific evidence to confirm that oral rehydration is the preferred the****utic choice, (3)potentially even more effective than IV infusion."

(1) So it has not been clinically proven to correct mild to moderate dehydration, not substantiated by medical literature. Does it say that it was clinically disproven? It does not.

(2)There is evidence that oral rehydration IS PREFERRED. Ok. There is a preference. No problem.

(3) Oral rehydration is potentially more effective. POTENTIALLY. How the hell did you take this statement to read, and I quote, "even more effective?" DO YOU KNOW WHAT THE WORD POTENTIALLY MEANS???

OF COURSE YOU DON'T BECAUSE YOU ARE ******ED. So who's the moron?

That's just to start. Here is the rest of what you've been dodging.

Do you honestly think that WADA wrote that entire section complete 13 references to medical journals and it has absolutly zero significance on the granting of a TUE for IV re-hydration?

You idiot. There is a document that is completely responsible for when a TUE will be granted, and that is the ISTUE. Too bad you can't read it. Still waiting for you to show me where it states that severe dehydration must be proven to receive a TUE. WHY HAVE YOU BEEN DUCKING THIS SINCE YOU'VE SAID THIS A NUMBER OF TIMES? Could it be that you would have to realize YOU CAN'T READ!

Your argument is that this entire section has no meaning. Then why did WADA research it and write it.

I don't have any problem with what they wrote at all. The question is, does the ISTUE allow for IV use? It clearly does if it can be justified.

[IMG][/IMG]

The more simple answer is that you are a moron who reads and writes at a 3rd grade level. And you cant understand it because you are ******. Its written for doctors. Not morons like you.

Does this explain why you:
Don't know what the meaning of "OR" is....
Don't know what the meaning of the word POTENTIALLY is...
Can't seem to understand the documentation in the picture I provided above...
Can't show me where in the ISTUE it states that severe dehydration must be proven in order to secure a TUE....

You're not fooling anyone. Everyone knows you are an idiot. For someone who claims to have science degrees, why is it that I've been owning you over and over...and over...and over. And this is all because YOU CAN'T READ! You remind me of Rocky Balboa trying to do commercials.

Let me put it to you even more clearly since you have the mental capacity of a bag of dust. The ISTUE clearly allows IV use if the athlete or medical practitioner can prove that it is justifiable.

Now, show me your proof that it was not proven to be justified.

That's what I thought. Now shut your dumb a$$ up.

[Dosumpthin]

you can conjunction this and conjunction that, adjective this and adjective that verb this and verb that. but what you can't do obviously is prove that floyd was dehydrated.

Understanding conjunctions, adjectives and adverbs are crucial if we are communicating in English. Since I don't speak pact@rdenese or suffer from pact@rdism.

Let's try this....

49-0.