who among suspected PED user got away the most: Pacquaio, Mayweather or Marquez?

[Real King Kong]

same line of argument considerthis used, you can not say that because you were not there.

i was not there with neil and buzz when they landed on the moon, so i can not say they landed on the moon. no one can. only neil and buzz.

genis floyd fan and his logic.

....and the same ****** response you had when i said that.

Did it ever occur to you morons that he used the iv simply because he felt like it is beneficial...as many athletes do.

http://www.edgeathletelounge.com/blo...ic-performance

http://www.thestar.com/life/health_w...rformance.html

[Spoon23]

Dang! Still a landslide victory for Froid. No matter how these loyal fl0mos twist the script. People can see through Floyd's cheating ways tsk tsk tsk

Verdict is out! Froid roid is guilty! Sentence will be to enjoy the 200 million dollars he conned the boxing fans for.

[Dosumpthin]

your logic is floyd i mean flawed.

why would floyd said the reason for his dehydration was because of giving blood if the real reason was diarrhea or undisclosed illness or infection?

floyd is not a doctor, he is a boxer. I dont expect him to know what caused the dehydration, he only can be expected to accurately describe the symptoms. If his family doctor said it was giving blood, working out, diabetes, ****ting uncontrolably, malaria or whatever else, i still wouldnt care.


Because manny lost on may 2nd. Manny was outsmarted. As expected. Floyd didnt win because of new found brute strength, conditioning, reflexes abilty to take punches.

He won because he out boxed manny, just like the other 48 people.

But never mind that. Did you get a look at earth while you were on the moon?

[Spoon23]

Floyd could have easily been severely dehydrated due to a case of acute diarrhea caused by an undisclosed illness or infection. Unless you have evidence that proves Floyd's stool was solid, I'm going to go on record and Floyd needed an iv because of the ****s.

Prove me wrong. You can't.

GOT YOU!

We can speculate all day long. Or we can go with the facts. Your choice.

And don't deflect. Explain how it is not possible floyd had the runs.

"Floyd could have easily been severely dehydrated due to a case of acute diarrhea caused by an undisclosed illness or infection"

if the above be the case, the question is was there a doctor who examined floyd? who decided on using an iv?

it will be a merry-go-round affair again as the circumstances of floyf using an iv more than the allowed volume without medical prescription is concerned...

you and others speculate on why floyd needed the 750ml iv....

but in my mind, the question is why floyd took the iv in the manner he did...

It's the other way around Dosumption. Tangalog checkmated you lol

Now that you have mentioned and on record Floyd had diarrhea. Then where was the doctor that diagnosed him? Why is it to this day no Doctor has come out to clear the air that he had diarrhea and needed IVS?

Why no doctor?

answer: coz no sane doctor will sacrifice lying in public for Froid when he clearly wasn't dehydrated.

Checkmate bud. Tangalog owned you big time.

[Rath]

An application for a TUE will only be considered for retroactive approval where:

a. Emergency treatment or treatment of an acute medical condition was necessary; or

b. Due to other exceptional circumstances, there was insufficient time or opportunity for the Athlete to submit, or for the TUEC to consider, an application for the TUE prior lto Sample collection; or

c. It is agreed, by WADA and by the Anti-Doping Organization to whom the application for a retroactive TUE is or would be made, that fairness requires the grant of a retroactive TUE.


AS PER USADA.

Now explain yourself.

"Submit an application prior to sample"

Do you need me to explain further?

Most likely you do.

That means that the application would be submited AFTER....therefore making the application a retroactive one.


So now in typical pact@rd ****** conspiracies I expect you to say something really dumb.

I ask you do you know the difference between notification and application?

first - Floyd did not apply for TUE on may 1st, he just notified in advance USADA of IV use. why do i know he did not really intend to apply for TUE on may 1st?

genius floyd fans said Floyd even if he does not need to , applied for TUE voluntarily.

how long does it take to make a TUE application? 19 days?

now you see the reason why i said all these discussion is only possible if Floyd is proven to be dehydrated in an emergency state, life and death situation kind of.

you can not prove that he was.

1. IV infusion may 1st, application made may 1st, submission may 1st, approval may 1st, effective date of approval may 1st- retroactive or not?

2. IV infusion may 1st, application made may 1st, submission may 1st, approval may 21st effective date of approval may 21st - retroactive or not?

3. IV infusion May 1st, application made may 1st, submission may 19th, approval may 21st, effective date may 21st - retroactive or not?

4. IV infusion May 1st, application made may 19th, submission may 19th, approval may 21st, effective date may 1st - retroactive or not?

follow up question which is the retroactive, the TUE, or the application.

remember the first question do you know the difference between notification and application?

now follow up question do you know the difference between application and submission of that application?

[Spoon23]

I ask you do you know the difference between notification and application?

first - Floyd did not apply for TUE on may 1st, he just notified in advance USADA of IV use. why do i know he did not really intend to apply for TUE on may 1st?

genius floyd fans said Floyd even if he does not need to , applied for TUE voluntarily.

how long does it take to make a TUE application? 19 days?

now you see the reason why i said all these discussion is only possible if Floyd is proven to be dehydrated in an emergency state, life and death situation kind of.

you can not prove that he was.

1. IV infusion may 1st, application made may 1st, submission may 1st, approval may 1st, effective date of approval may 1st- retroactive or not?

2. IV infusion may 1st, application made may 1st, submission may 1st, approval may 21st effective date of approval may 21st - retroactive or not?

3. IV infusion May 1st, application made may 1st, submission may 19th, approval may 21st, effective date may 21st - retroactive or not?

4. IV infusion May 1st, application made may 19th, submission may 19th, approval may 21st, effective date may 1st - retroactive or not?

follow up question which is the retroactive, the TUE, or the application.

remember the first question do you know the difference between notification and application?

now follow up question do you know the difference between application and submission of that application?

Nasty Rath! You and Tangalog taking turns owning this Froid worshipper lol

Good point as always!

[Rath]

When you need to start pointing out mistakes in peoples posts you know you've lost.

Game, Set, Match.

a genius floyd fan logic

[Rath]

....and the same ****** response you had when i said that.

Did it ever occur to you morons that he used the iv simply because he felt like it is beneficial...as many athletes do.

http://www.edgeathletelounge.com/blo...ic-performance

http://www.thestar.com/life/health_w...rformance.html

deflection

your logic says you can not prove anything if you were not there when it happened. genius really.

and did it ever occur to you geniuses that floyd did not use IV because he felt like it.

Floyd and USADA said Floyd used IV not because he felt like it but because he was dehydrated.

spin that.

[Dosumpthin]

I ask you do you know the difference between notification and application?

first - Floyd did not apply for TUE on may 1st, he just notified in advance USADA of IV use. why do i know he did not really intend to apply for TUE on may 1st?

genius floyd fans said Floyd even if he does not need to , applied for TUE voluntarily.

how long does it take to make a TUE application? 19 days?

now you see the reason why i said all these discussion is only possible if Floyd is proven to be dehydrated in an emergency state, life and death situation kind of.

you can not prove that he was.

1. IV infusion may 1st, application made may 1st, submission may 1st, approval may 1st, effective date of approval may 1st- retroactive or not?

2. IV infusion may 1st, application made may 1st, submission may 1st, approval may 21st effective date of approval may 21st - retroactive or not?

3. IV infusion May 1st, application made may 1st, submission may 19th, approval may 21st, effective date may 21st - retroactive or not?

4. IV infusion May 1st, application made may 19th, submission may 19th, approval may 21st, effective date may 1st - retroactive or not?

follow up question which is the retroactive, the TUE, or the application.

remember the first question do you know the difference between notification and application?

now follow up question do you know the difference between application and submission of that application?

I can only laugh. You never disappoint. Not that im going to entertain your ******ity much longer but do you have any idea what and how long to formally complete the application? You think its a downloadable pdf that requires only floyds signature?


Im not even scratching the surface on how you dont understand what retroactive means but it lies in you not understanding what an adjective is vs a noun. This is where most of your misunderstanding lies so im going to stop calling you ****** but rather ignorant.

[Rath]

Nasty Rath! You and Tangalog taking turns owning this Froid worshipper lol

Good point as always!

welcome back spoon hahahahahaha how was your vacation?

what was the ban for?