who among suspected PED user got away the most: Pacquaio, Mayweather or Marquez?

[Rath]

No idiot. We are talking about the IV for the Pacquiao fight. Isn't that what you say allowed him to take PEDs? The IV?

Again, he gave a partial urine sample before the IV.

As for your other tidbit...

"After UCI's formal notification to Armstrong about their decision to back the USADA decision on December 6, 2012, Armstrong had 21 days to appeal the decision to the Court of Arbitration for Sport. According to L'Equipe, CAS indicated that Armstrong had made no appeal by the evening of December 27, so the final deadline to appeal had passed.[49]

On December 14, 2012, Armstrong met secretly with USADA CEO Travis Tygart at the offices of the former Colorado governor Bill Ritter. During this meeting, Armstrong asked USADA to reduce his lifetime ban from sports to just one year, in exchange for his cooperation with its ongoing investigations, which included its case against Bruyneel. Tygart told Armstrong that under the anti-doping rules, USADA could bring his ban down to eight years, and said that cooperating with USADA would help Armstrong to improve his public image. These secret discussions fell apart after Armstrong told Tygart that Armstrong held the keys to his own redemption"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lance_...1.E2.80.932012

Now why don't you be a good boy and admit you were wrong about that red corner blue corner fiasco. Or how about USADA and their statement on random testing.

this is what i am trying to say you must admit you are wrong.

"Originally Posted by travestyny View Post
Dude, give it a rest. The only similarity between Lance and Floyd is the use of an IV. Does that mean everyone who took an IV has abused PEDs?



and Floyd never delayed any testing


you gave me a proof that shows NSAC final score card red corner won, how is that wrong? red corner won according to the final score card was my stand.

i have a proof that you yourself gave.

USADA own words "we don't conduct random drug test" therefore the drug test was not random how is that wrong?

what is the difference between random and unexpected?

hey are going to be a gentleman like GTTofAK and admit your mistake (bolded)?

or you are going to spin deflect and divert it like a true genius floyd fan

[travestyny]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...004Dec3_2.html




Well if you bothered to so a check on this dumb ***** you would find that this ***** is the same talking head that got trotted out in 2005 to provide cover for Lance Armstrong's positive EPO test.


http://velonews.competitor.com/2005/...A8Gcoy8Pzfx.99
Of course Dr. Ayotte was talking bull****. The test was accurate and Lance Armstrong was taking synthetic EPO.

So it seems that Dr. Ayotte has a well established history of making bull**** statements to cover for testing failures.

Great source you got there dumbass.

Once again, read her quotations and use your reading comprehension. Does it seem like she is talking about the cream and the clear. Read carefully now.

Tell me, what do you think she is talking about.

Talking head? Let's look at her credentials:

Member, various working groups, WADA (World Anti-Doping Agency), 2000-present
Member, IOC Working Group on Harmonization of Laboratory protocols, 1996-present
Professor, Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique (INRS)-Institut Armand-Frappier research centre, 1992-present
Director, WADA-accredited laboratory in Montreal, Canada, 1991-present
Member, l'Ordre des Chimistes du Québec, 1982-present
Recipient, Medal of Honour of the Canadian Medical Association, 2006
Chair of the Jury, Prix du Québec Wilder-Penfield, 2003
Member of the Jury, Prix du Québec Wilder-Penfield, 2002
Member, IOC (International Olympic Committee) Medical Commission, Salt Lake City Olympic Games, 2002
Recipient, Scientist of the Year, Société Radio-Canada, 1999
Member, IOC Working Group sub-commission Doping and Biochemistry of Sport, 1996-1998
Member, IAAF (International Association of Athletics Federations) Doping Commission, 1995-present
Representative, Heads of IOC Accredited Laboratories, 1995-1996
Education:
PhD, Organic Chemistry, Université de Montréal, 1983
MSc, Organic Chemistry, Université de Montréal, 1978

Ok. Now list yours. I been waiting for it.

Do you really want me to do it to you again? I have faith that with a little reading comprehension, you can figure this out yourself.

[travestyny]

this is what i am trying to say you must admit you are wrong.

"Originally Posted by travestyny View Post
Dude, give it a rest. The only similarity between Lance and Floyd is the use of an IV. Does that mean everyone who took an IV has abused PEDs?



and Floyd never delayed any testing


you gave me a proof that shows NSAC final score card red corner won, how is that wrong? red corner won according to the final score card was my stand.

i have a proof that you yourself gave.

USADA own words "we don't conduct random drug test" therefore the drug test was not random how is that wrong?

what is the difference between random and unexpected?

hey are going to be a gentleman like GTTofAK and admit your mistake (bolded)?

or you are going to spin deflect and divert it like a true genius floyd fan

Oh do I? I admit that you are an idiot. Please tell me, what do you say when people mention to you that if your little corner conspiracy is correct, that means all the judges gave Mayweather round 4 and 6. I've seen a few posters mention that to you, but never heard a clear answer from you.

What say you?

[GTTofAK]

It's already been discussed that you can't prove he wasn't severely dehydrated. You also never found out what USADA's standard was for acute or chronic dehydration.

Uh yes you ****ing can you dumb****. USADA is under WADA. WADA defines severe dehydration as

Even though the majority of cases of dehydration can be treated via oral consumption, IV treatment of severe dehydration (>7% body weight loss), exertional heat illness, nausea, emesis, or diarrhea, and in those who cannot ingest oral fluids for other reasons, is clinically indicated.2,3,7,23,68 Otherwise, as the American College of Sports Medicine consensus guidelines state, "IV fluids do not provide an advantage over drinking oral fluids and electrolytes."

Since Froids weight was checked regularly we know that his weight one month out from the fight was 150.5lbs. He weighed in at 146. That is a 3% loss of weight over a month. That is well below WADA definition of severe dehydration.

So yes you dumbass it is proven beyond any reasonable doubt that Froid was not severely dehydrated as defined by WADA.

[GTTofAK]

Once again, read her quotations and use your reading comprehension. Does it seem like she is talking about the cream and the clear. Read carefully now.

Tell me, what do you think she is talking about.

Talking head? Let's look at her credentials:

I dont give a **** what her credentials are. Credentials do not means she is an honest human being. She has a history of making bull**** statements to the press to cover for failed tests. She isn't a credible source because she has previously made false statements.

[Zaroku]

Once again, read her quotations and use your reading comprehension. Does it seem like she is talking about the cream and the clear. Read carefully now.

Tell me, what do you think she is talking about.

Talking head? Let's look at her credentials:

Member, various working groups, WADA (World Anti-Doping Agency), 2000-present
Member, IOC Working Group on Harmonization of Laboratory protocols, 1996-present
Professor, Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique (INRS)-Institut Armand-Frappier research centre, 1992-present
Director, WADA-accredited laboratory in Montreal, Canada, 1991-present
Member, l'Ordre des Chimistes du Québec, 1982-present
Recipient, Medal of Honour of the Canadian Medical Association, 2006
Chair of the Jury, Prix du Québec Wilder-Penfield, 2003
Member of the Jury, Prix du Québec Wilder-Penfield, 2002
Member, IOC (International Olympic Committee) Medical Commission, Salt Lake City Olympic Games, 2002
Recipient, Scientist of the Year, Société Radio-Canada, 1999
Member, IOC Working Group sub-commission Doping and Biochemistry of Sport, 1996-1998
Member, IAAF (International Association of Athletics Federations) Doping Commission, 1995-present
Representative, Heads of IOC Accredited Laboratories, 1995-1996
Education:
PhD, Organic Chemistry, Université de Montréal, 1983
MSc, Organic Chemistry, Université de Montréal, 1978

Ok. Now list yours. I been waiting for it.

Do you really want me to do it to you again? I have faith that with a little reading comprehension, you can figure this out yourself.

GED, Angry PAC Institute of Excuses
Certificate from I use bad words when I get mad
GTTAK. GizayToolTecknologist Azz Klown

[travestyny]

Uh yes you ****ing can you dumb****. USADA is under WADA. WADA defines severe dehydration as



Since Froids weight was checked regularly we know that his weight one month out from the fight was 150.5lbs. He weighed in at 146. That is a 3% loss of weight over a month. That is well below WADA definition of severe dehydration.

So yes you dumbass it is proven beyond any reasonable doubt that Froid was not severely dehydrated as defined by WADA.

Once again, you have no idea what you are talking about. Show me what they have to say about acute or chronic dehydration for the TUE to be passed. I'll wait...

[Dosumpthin]

Actually I proved that Floyd could not have been severely dehydrated. Once I did you all deflected. In summary, Floyd's weight was stable. You cannot be severely dehydrated with a relatively stable weight. Plus Floyd's vital sign show one that was not. Floyd provided his excuses.

Again, you do not have to test positive for a PEDs to violate Wada rules. It's simple to understand.

Not matter how hard you try you keep coming up short. Same story different day.
You are not a doctor. And if you were youd realize how ****** people that follow Hauser are.



Floyd did NOT, I repeat, DID NOT violate nsac usada or wada rules. WADA RULES ARE CLEAR ABOUT INTRAVENOUS INFUSIONS. The TUEC APPROVED THE RETROACTIVE TUE, not Floyd.


It is your own, better yet Thomas hausers OPINION, that he should NOT have been granted a the****utic use exemption. Which is ****** because neither one of you have the...

1. TUE application
2. The reasoning behind the TUEC

...to form a worthwhile opinion of any substance.


So you can SPECULATE on a undisclosed medical condition all you want. But even then, not matter the conspiracy, you should be upset with USADA TUEC OR WADA. CONTACT WADA AND REQUEST A REVIEW OF THE IV USE.



But no. You need Floyd to be on peds.
For the sake of the Manny.
This is why we laugh at your hatred for Floyd. It's why we laugh because Manny lost.

Do you get it? Its that simple. Call wada, give them your credentials and ask for a statement.

[Rath]

So because Lance was eventually guilty, NFL lied, and bankers made errors, Floyd must be as well. Yeah, that's valid logic and reasoning.

nope that how your flawed logic and twisted reasoning processed what i said.

most if not all genius floyd fans have flawed logic and twisted reasoning and you are one of the example with your reply

i posted an example about the two kinds of fans you were referring to. you even gave example of mac and pacboy and then me and spoon

the one kind of fan that accepts what happened and move on and the other type of fan that keeps on fighting.

that was my post was all about not for floyd to admit his cheating ways.

he don't have to

it will be exposed eventually ten 15 yrs we don't know but it will guaranteed

you think you've got me there, right dunn?

told you i know your game.

SHAME ON YOU

[travestyny]

I dont give a **** what her credentials are. Credentials do not means she is an honest human being. She has a history of making bull**** statements to the press to cover for failed tests. She isn't a credible source because she has previously made false statements.

You really are a fool. She clearly knows much more about this topic than you. You are sitting here trying to convince me that she doesn't know about the clear and the cream. Do you really think that statement was made about them? Really? You can't figure out what she is talking about?

Do you honestly think in her position she has never come across the drugs that were the most talked about in the history of her field of work?

You are a certified moron. Once again...Reading Comprehension. Go back and read her quotations and try again please.

FURTHERMORE, YOUUUU PREVIOUSLY MADE FALSE STATEMENTS. STOP DOING IT TO YOURSELF!