Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Loeffler on Working With Haymon Side To Finalize Golovkin-Wade

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Dreamking View Post
    Are you ******ed? He was trying to get BJS or anyone else but nobody even asked for a fight INCLUDING LARA. The IBF then stepped in and said he has to fight these fighters. And what do you know after that happen LARA SAID SOMETHING. Now
    What in the world is wrong with you people on this site?

    On December 19th, BJS made it abundantly clear that he wanted no parts of GGG for the next 18 months. He put video's up saying this and gave interviews. There should've been ZERO temptation for Team GGG to pursue a fight with BJS in the first place. Why, you and your ilk refuse to acknowledge this fact is beyond me.

    If BJS publically states he doesn't want to fight GGG, why not go after the #2 MW in Jacobs when you know BJS doesn't want to fight?

    GGG's mandatory wasn't mentioned until Team GGG already had ample time to attempt to make a Jacobs fight.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by chepboxingking View Post
      Dude, THE IBF WAS NOT ENFORCING THEIR MANDO! Idk if you're misinformed or just making excuses for GGG. Yes, now that he satisfies his IBF mando, he'll be free in the fall, and possibly early next year, to fight anyone he chooses, but I doubt the IBF would've stood in the way of a GGG-canelo fight by enforcing their mando in the fall.

      ggg-canelo is a unification and would trump a mando dummy

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Chollo Vista View Post
        What in the world is wrong with you people on this site?

        On December 19th, BJS made it abundantly clear that he wanted no parts of GGG for the next 18 months. He put video's up saying this and gave interviews. There should've been ZERO temptation for Team GGG to pursue a fight with BJS in the first place. Why, you and your ilk refuse to acknowledge this fact is beyond me.

        If BJS publically states he doesn't want to fight GGG, why not go after the #2 MW in Jacobs when you know BJS doesn't want to fight?

        GGG's mandatory wasn't mentioned until Team GGG already had ample time to attempt to make a Jacobs fight.
        the IBF mando being due was no mystery to anyone, except maybe you. Saunders is a unification, Jacobs is not. Had he fought Jacobs he would have been stripped of the IBF title. Im really cant figure out why this is so hard for you to understand, but I'll make you a little chart to help you along:

        To not be stripped of the IBF title, GGGs options were the following:


        Canelo (unification)
        Saunders (unification)
        Johnson (mando)
        Wade (after Johnson withdrew)

        Fights that would result in being stripped of the IBF title:


        Jacobs
        Lara
        Quillin
        Lee
        Ndam
        (insert any other name you want here)


        hopefully that clears it up for you........

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by OnePunch View Post
          ggg-canelo is a unification and would trump a mando dummy
          Exactly clown. No need to face his mando- unless your mando is a cherry and you're out picking.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by chepboxingking View Post
            Exactly clown. No need to face his mando- unless your mando is a cherry and you're out picking.
            you seem to really be struggling with this, but it really isnt that difficult. There has been a mando due since before GGG even won the belt from Lemieux. Dont you remember after Lemieux beat Ndam that Oscar said they couldnt fight GGG because Lemieux had a mando due, and everyone called BS on oscar because GGG would be a unification and that trumps a mando. The point is that the mando has been due, and is STILL due. If GGG fights ANYONE other than a unification fight, or the mandatory challenger, he WILL be stripped by the IBF. It has nothing to do with who he fights in the fall, it has to do with who he fights on April 23.

            Comment


            • #36
              Couldn't GGG have petitioned for Jacobs to be is Mando( since technically he is) thus forgoing fighting Wade til later?

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Gentblue View Post
                Couldn't GGG have petitioned for Jacobs to be is Mando( since technically he is) thus forgoing fighting Wade til later?
                Jacobs ultimately will be his WBA mando, but its the IBF mando thats due now not the WBA......

                Comment


                • #38
                  This is great. Now there is no impediment to making the Erislandy Lara fight.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by twosweethooks View Post
                    Wow !! You still alive?? Watch out for the salt !! Put salt on slugs they melt away
                    Absolutely corny

                    Absolutely f uckin corny

                    Do you really want my attention redskin?

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by hitking View Post
                      If he could fight Wade, why not Lara???
                      We know why

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP