Comments Thread For: Tarver Cracked Hard Over Child Support Bill - Belts, Medal, Car

[BrotherDudeJack]

Milk dud???

[chicken-]

Tarver is a cheater, I don't feel bad for him.

[KeyboardWarrior]

He has certainly entertained fans over the years. I truly hope he bounces back from this.

[LacedUp]

In what world does a kid need $750k?

That money is going straight down the pocket of the mom who sounds like a gold digger.

[buddyguns]

I got a question...You got any excuses tonight Antonio?

[richardt]

This guy has been busted TWICE for cheating! I hope they take everything he owns. I wonder how many fighters have loses on their records that don't belong there because they fought a cheater in Tarver. Collateral justice or Karma.....whatever it is, he deserves it.

[Eff Pandas]

$700k? Tarver's daughter needs to eat $100 bills to live or something?

How old is this kid?

They really need a new way to do this child support stuff. Tarver has hardly fought in the last several years & idk what sorta revenue streams he's got besides boxing & sometimes commentating, but idk that anyone should be owing $700k for child support ever. Its expensive to raise a kid. No question about that, but raising a kid is a partnership, so the other person need to put in her $700k too I assume & its just not THAT expensive lets quit bsing.

[fanofslug]

Tarver must turn over his Olympic bronze medal, championship belts and Mercedes to be cashed in for the debt of his child support which is around $750K





source:
http://wfla.com/2016/01/29/antonio-m...borough-court/


FUN FACT: We learned from this is that He get paid $6000 per broadcast commentating he does for spike tv.

His kid should be his number 1 priority and his "whole life".

[Zaroku]

Being responsible for one's kids should be obvious.

[PhillyBox11]

Every man should take care of his kids, but how does a judge issue a 750k child support order? That kid living in a gold house? System is out of control! Why not just put Tarver in jail so not only does he not provide for his kids, but the state pays 80k/yr for lock up? That probably next. So dumb. Garnish his wages, but you don't make it impossible for the guy to work. It makes zero sense. That's the government.