Should Manny Still Be Placed Above Floyd On The ATG List?

[HanzGruber]

The people have already spoken. Pbf> PAC

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=686122&page=30

[b00g13man]

How is this even a debate. We've got some real sour posters out here. You guys need to get over that L. You talked mad **** for years, and it didn't work out as planned.

[lopetego]

Pacquiao beat the better opponents and gave us the better fights.

Pac will always be better than cherrypicking Floydette, who wouldn't fight a 15yo pregnant girl unless the odds were heavily stacked in his favour

[Beercules]

I have Khan above both

This right here. Both ducked the king.

[DeandreXI]

He should absolutely be placed above Floyd. He did more overall.

More whining after the fight, sure...

[madsweeney]

Based on what?

I've been explaining multiple times in this thread. You don't agree, provide evidence to support your opinion.

But since you guys dont seem to like to read, here's some justification for my opinion....
Physical age - Morales was 30 when he fought Pac. Pac was 38 when Floyd fought him
Fighter age - Morales 51 fights over 13 years, Pac 65 fights over 20 years. Both brawlers but Pac relied more on athleticism/Morales more traditional skills.
recent loss type - Morales lost 3 times before Pac, all by decision. Pac 5 losses including 3 knockouts

Now please, tell me, how the hell you think a 30 yr old Morales being KO'ed for the first time in his career, was a worse win than a 38 year old Pac with a fairly recent KO.

[BrometheusBob.]

>Should Manny still be above Floyd on the ATG list?
Idk about that but I do know neither of them got anything on BrometheusSOG though

[GoldenGloveLove]

It's always interesting when you start your thread off with a patently absurd lie.

[ironmt]

[QUOTE=madsweeney;16434595]I've been explaining multiple times in this thread. You don't agree, provide evidence to support your opinion.

But since you guys dont seem to like to read, here's some justification for my opinion....
Physical age - Morales was 30 when he fought Pac. Pac was 38 when Floyd fought him
Fighter age - Morales 51 fights over 13 years, Pac 65 fights over 20 years. Both brawlers but Pac relied more on athleticism/Morales more traditional skills.
recent loss type - Morales lost 3 times before Pac, all by decision. Pac 5 losses including 3 knockouts

Now please, tell me, how the hell you think a 30 yr old Morales being KO'ed for the first time in his career, was a worse win than a 38 year old Pac with a fairly recent KO.[/QUOTE
Another great post, you are on a roll today. You have destroyed the competition and It wasn't even close.

[b00g13man]

I've been explaining multiple times in this thread. You don't agree, provide evidence to support your opinion.

But since you guys dont seem to like to read, here's some justification for my opinion....
Physical age - Morales was 30 when he fought Pac. Pac was 38 when Floyd fought him
Fighter age - Morales 51 fights over 13 years, Pac 65 fights over 20 years. Both brawlers but Pac relied more on athleticism/Morales more traditional skills.
recent loss type - Morales lost 3 times before Pac, all by decision. Pac 5 losses including 3 knockouts

Now please, tell me, how the hell you think a 30 yr old Morales being KO'ed for the first time in his career, was a worse win than a 38 year old Pac with a fairly recent KO.

He most certainly wasn't. Additionally, you can't compare a boxer's decline to another's based on the number of fights or age. They decline at different rates.