Better resume Danny Garcia or GGG

[48cantCstraight]

Both have subpar resumes but Garcia really ain't done ****. He shoulda lost to Peterson and he fought Rod ***ing Salsa. Triple G all the way in this one.

[GOT BEEF?]

No it was Ring...and remember you said Boxrec was fair and objective...****ing clown

where the hell did i ever say that? i don't even use boxrec other than to refresh my memory on some fights. they use a points system, i would never trust a system like that to determine p4p status. i think they have canelo as #1.

[lopetego]

broner was never p4p #6 by ring magazine. that must have been boxrec or something. i dobut ring was that ******.

Broner was top P4P # 5 at some point, and yes, by RING

It's not about RING being ******, it's about promoting their guys thinking the fans are ******

They had that bum Guerrero at #10 P4P just to promote his match with Floyd

[BrometheusBob.]

No, that's Canelo

Lara, Trout and Cotto > > > Matthyse and Khan

Im not taking Garcia's gifts against Herrera or PEDerson into account, nor his victory over the corpse of Morales

Hm... yeah I suppose you could pick Canelo between the two. Whatever point is Larry is reaching pretty high to find someone to compare with GGG.

[SilverMiles]

Your posts are becoming cringe worthy dude. That's not the ***ing question Danny's resume is 100 times better. Why must you twist things. And Larry you need to chill lol

Not as cringe worthy as Larry's GGG attack thread #100. GGG beats Garcia as P4P, end of story.

[boxcityusa805]

Golovkin, he only wants top 10 competition at middleweight and wants to unify. Garcia fought salka at 2 weight classes higher than salka was competing at. That fight stains a resume! now he is after Guerrero who lost to Thurman and lost to Martinez regardless of what his record says...
Come to think of it, almost all of the pbc fighters are staining their resumes!

[GOT BEEF?]

Not as cringe worthy as Larry's GGG attack thread #100. GGG beats Garcia as P4P, end of story.

you are absolutely right, if ggg and garcia were the same size, golovkin would destroy him. there is no question.

[al-Xander]

I don't even get why Garcia gets this kind of hype. He first rose to prominence when he beat shot-to-pieces, dilapidated Morales, even gave the almost-retired Erik a rematch.

He beat Khan, sure, by 4th round stoppage. But who is Khan? He's the guy whose chin Prescott already exposed. From there the Garcia father and son team started acting like they've accomplished a lot already.

They snubbed Khan's request for a rematch for years. Yeah, offer them a trilogy with Morales or a Malignaggi rematch and they'll take it in a heartbeat. They had stomach to take the Salsa fight, after all.

They avoided any talk of a Mayweather and Pacquiao fight like they're nothing when everyone else wants a piece of the two superstars.

They gave Schaefer a hard time when Matthysse was offered to them. They only agreed when they were offered hyuuge money. And who is Matthysse? The guy whom Alexander and Judah already beat. I don't remember them getting this kind of hype when they beat the Argentinian.

He's a proven fighter, but I won't give him that kind of hype others do. Nah.

[-PBP-]

broner was never p4p #6 by ring magazine. that must have been boxrec or something. i dobut ring was that ******.

But when BoxRec had Wlad #1 you said it was fair and objective without the biss of sports writers.

[FrenchDeLaHoya]

danny garcia has the better resume (sort of like pacquiao)

however..

ggg has better performances against his opponents (sort of like floyd)