Better resume Danny Garcia or GGG

[BrometheusBob.]

So when Broner was p4p #6 i guess you agreed with that right??

and you also agree the Guerrero and Canelo were p4p top 10 when Floyd beat them right??

I'd bet anything that if I searched your post history I'd find nothing at that time period opposed to Broner's P4P ranking. #6 would probably have seemed like a totally legitimate spot for the future fighter of the decade.

Literally the moment Porter was announced the winner in their fight you joined the anti-Broner bandwagon. It's been pretty funny to see actually.

Anyway Danny Garcia has the best resume for a fighter under 30 and has a better resume than GGG. That being said looking 50/50 against Lamont Peterson and Herrera and stopping Paul Malignaggi & Rod Salka has rightly resulted in a dip of Garcia's stock.

[Larry the boss]

hyped up overrated brawler in matthysse - check

declining ever since robbing khan and the ped testosterone scandal in peterson - check

his only good win is khan, and that is one that he was losing comfortably because he clipped him. khan never recovered. notice how garcia doesn't want to give him a rematch? they know it was a fluke. and even so, khan isn't elite himself anyway.

Now name out the killers on GGG's resume..lol

GGG beat Garcia ass P4P, end of story.

Who has the better resume?

[Larry the boss]

I'd bet anything that if I searched your post history I'd find nothing at that time period opposed to Broner's P4P ranking. #6 would probably have seemed like a totally legitimate spot for the future fighter of the decade.

Anyway Danny Garcia has the best resume for a fighter under 30 and has a better resume than GGG. That being said looking 50/50 against Lamont Peterson and Herrera and stopping Paul Malignaggi has rightly resulted in a dip of Garcia's stock.

Thanks for answering the question

[BrometheusBob.]

Thanks for answering the question

But will you agree that you did not actually oppose Broner's P4P ranking in the past?

[HanzGruber]

GGG beat Garcia ass P4P, end of story.

Your posts are becoming cringe worthy dude. That's not the ***ing question Danny's resume is 100 times better. Why must you twist things. And Larry you need to chill lol

[lopetego]

I'd bet anything that if I searched your post history I'd find nothing at that time period opposed to Broner's P4P ranking. #6 would probably have seemed like a totally legitimate spot for the future fighter of the decade.

Literally the moment Porter was announced the winner in their fight you joined the anti-Broner bandwagon. It's been pretty funny to see actually.

Anyway Danny Garcia has the best resume for a fighter under 30 and has a better resume than GGG. That being said looking 50/50 against Lamont Peterson and Herrera and stopping Paul Malignaggi & Rod Salka has rightly resulted in a dip of Garcia's stock.

No, that's Canelo

Lara, Trout and Cotto > > > Matthyse and Khan

Im not taking Garcia's gifts against Herrera or PEDerson into account, nor his victory over the corpse of Morales

[Weebler I]

Larry's gone GGG crazy

[Larry the boss]

But will you agree that you did not actually oppose Broner's P4P ranking in the past?

Yea i thought him moving up straight from 135 to 147 was pretty damn amazing...

[GOT BEEF?]

broner was never p4p #6 by ring magazine. that must have been boxrec or something. i dobut ring was that ******.

[Larry the boss]

broner was never p4p #6 by ring magazine. that must have been boxrec or something. i dobut ring was that ******.

No it was Ring...and remember you said Boxrec was fair and objective...****ing clown