Do YOU consider any PBC fighter to be top 10 p4p?

[A.K]

also pbc has errol spence and i know he hasnt fought anyone but i can tell by his technique hes gonna be the future.

[R_Walken]

The lists are a joke and so biased it's hard to take seriously.


I mean Manny is rated #3 but has won 3 of his last 6 fights. Loma who I'm a fan of has 6 fights 4 against no hopers and is 50% against respectable names but he's on most of the lists. Crawford has 1 legit name ( Gamboa ) on his resume who was clearly to small for that fight. Big fan of Rigo but he hasn't faced a legit name in 2-3 years and really that was his only top level name on his resume.

For PBC Danny G should be on all the lists and I think a case can be made for Stevenson, Degeale, Lara, LSC, Wilder , winner of Porter / Thurman , and Frampton can be in the discussion he gets past Quigg. If you base it on the same criteria that Espn & Ring use but it won't happen because Rings owned by Oscar who's suing Haymon and Dan Raceal and co are TR / HBo lackeys

[A.K]

The lists are a joke and so biased it's hard to take seriously.


I mean Manny is rated #3 but has won 3 of his last 6 fights. Loma who I'm a fan of has 6 fights 4 against no hopers and is 50% against respectable names but he's on most of the lists. Crawford has 1 legit name ( Gamboa ) on his resume who was clearly to small for that fight. Big fan of Rigo but he hasn't faced a legit name in 2-3 years and really that was his only top level name on his resume.

For PBC Danny G should be on all the lists and I think a case can be made for Stevenson, Degeale, Lara, LSC, Wilder , winner of Porter / Thurman , and Frampton can be in the discussion he gets past Quigg. If you base it on the same criteria that Espn & Ring use but it won't happen because Rings owned by Oscar who's suing Haymon and Dan Raceal and co are TR / HBo lackeys

sooo i had you till your second BIASED paragrapgh... danny G? same guy who got whooped by herrera and peterson and won "gift" decisions then picked cherry picks inbetween... no way garcia deserves ****, also lara a guy who fights on thursday nights and wilder who has 1 ranked opponent on his resume FOH

[HeroBando]

Holy ****, dude. Is it possible for you to scroll through a thread and look pass any criticism of GGG however minor without replying?

I can let you know my vacation schedule if you wanna get in some potshots at GGG unopposed

[R_Walken]

sooo i had you till your second BIASED paragrapgh... danny G? same guy who got whooped by herrera and peterson and won "gift" decisions then picked cherry picks inbetween... no way garcia deserves ****, also lara a guy who fights on thursday nights and wilder who has 1 ranked opponent on his resume FOH

I'm not saying everyone I mentioned should be on there but if your fair and objective and hold them to the same standard a couple could be included

Danny should, he cleaned out his div that was filled with legit names it's not how you win but if . he beat Lamont who gave up the first 7 rounds , Herrera I thought he won but even if you didn't and feel he got a gift it's no different then Canelo who got a gift against Lara and he's on there

[b00g13man]

Holy ****, dude. Is it possible for you to scroll through a thread and look pass any criticism of GGG however minor without replying?

Looooool. It's a full time job dude.

[Motofan]

I think you mean Canelo😄

I'm no homer. Lara could have been given the nod depending on how you score. As could have Trout (and the open scoring ****ing ruined that fight). I gave him both fights, but its not like I don't see the argument.

[Fetta]

There is no clear 1 and the rest can be biased and just thrown in there to benefit a network or promoter.

Its an imaginary list

[BrometheusBob.]

Garcia is not in my top 10 but he's really the only PBC fighter that comes to mind that could be there. He's only 27 though so he'll probably be back on it if he stops ****in around with these Malignaggis and Guerreros.

[SergioMartinez]

sooo i had you till your second BIASED paragrapgh... danny G? same guy who got whooped by herrera and peterson and won "gift" decisions then picked cherry picks inbetween... no way garcia deserves ****, also lara a guy who fights on thursday nights and wilder who has 1 ranked opponent on his resume FOH

If Danny Garcia is not top 10, how can Canelo be?

Hear me out...

Supposedly Danny really lost to Herrera and Peterson right??

Supposedly Canelo really lost to Lara, and some might say Trout.

They really are two in the same.

So if those 2 gift decisions stop Garcia from being top 10, why not Canelo?