Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Golovkin's Promoter: Big Offer Made To Saunders For April

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    Originally posted by Kagami Taiga View Post
    6 mil? This fight isn't worth 6 mil. Who the **** is paying that?
    No one is. Saunders is going off WHAT IT WILL TAKE for him to actually fight Golovkin. He already said the only way he'll fight Golovkin is for 3-4 million pounds, thus his twitter comment. I'm sure K2 is offering a more than fair option but it's simply not possible to get Saunders what he's demanding and Saunders knows that, he's very open about not being "ready" for Golovkin (thus the high demand on his part - he'll only fight him now for some absurd amount of cash).

    Comment


    • #72
      Originally posted by Najuk View Post
      Mayweather cherry picked a lot too and was all about money but a lot of people consider him one of the best ever. ggg goes same way, he might be hated and his resume queationed but he will remembered as a legend middleweight... people have never spoken about any middleweight boxer as they speak about ggg ever

      Comment


      • #73
        So, there is tonnes of money lying around to make Saunders - a complete unknown from the UK - a great offer..... but there is no money whatsoever for Ward or Lara?

        Whats next, they will meet Saunders at 155 ?

        Comment


        • #74
          Originally posted by daggum View Post

          ggg actually tried to do the same exact thing floyd did. move up a weight division for the big money but not necessarily the "best" fight. did you forget he tried to fight froch? oscar was ranked #6 and had 1 win in 3 years when floyd fought him. froch was at least ranked #1. yes he was #1 because of ward's inactivity but he still brought far more to the table money wise than ward and was much better than the oscar floyd fought. wasn't cory spinks ranked #1 but floyd fought oscar instead. i don't remember anyone saying floyd you are ducking spinks!!! just be consistent. ggg's at least trying to fight everyone at 160 unlike floyd did at 147 refusing to fight margarito, retiring instead of fighting cotto and waiting 6 years to fight pac. that's not respectable.
          futhermore if ggg wanted big fights um they are at 154 not 160..he wanted the money of chavez thats why he went to 160..
          i've always said for a man who says he can fight at 154 but rather take the easy rout at 160 he's getting way to much credit...canelo, floyd, trout,lara, even the kirklands of the world are better than the best of 160..imo

          Comment


          • #75
            Originally posted by tiliheels View Post
            futhermore if ggg wanted big fights um they are at 154 not 160..he wanted the money of chavez thats why he went to 160..
            i've always said for a man who says he can fight at 154 but rather take the easy rout at 160 he's getting way to much credit...canelo, floyd, trout,lara, even the kirklands of the world are better than the best of 160..imo
            i don't understand what you are saying. ggg turned pro at 160. he turned pro at 160 to chase chavez who was unknown at the time? 154 doesn't have anyone. you mean 155? he's slotted to face canelo so that is the big fight that you are talking about and he's set for it. what more do you want him to do? do you have more things on your impossible checklist for him to do so you are pleased?

            Comment


            • #76
              Originally posted by tiliheels View Post
              margo was not a number 1 contender to zab, floyd, no baldo...
              baldo was the lineal champ of the division after beating zab...and floyd fought him to become the lineal king...margo was soon to be, but he lost his belt to paul willliams while they were bulding the fight..and williams lost his belt next..floyd had bigger fish to fry in oscar and hatton soon after...the man took risk he cant help that guys lose on their own time..im not askin ggg to win for other fighters..im just point out the obvious..floyd poops on his resume and ggg willn ever come close to floyd's
              marg was ranked #1 in 2004, 2005, 2006. marg didn't lose until midway in 2007 and that was after floyd had fought oscar. please do better research so you can undrstand the timeline better. floyd chose to fight unranked sharmba, zab coming off an embarrassing loss, and an unknown journeyman instead of margarito who was ranked #1 that entire time. building the fight...dame un break! he fougth zab coming off a loss to a bum but he couldn't fight marg coming off a loss to top contender williams? that's nonsensical. even after marg lost he still came back to become #1 but floyd was retired. was he still buidling the fight?

              Comment


              • #77
                Originally posted by UTEP
                Golovkin would murder that dude. I'd rather see him fight Jacobs or Canelo (no catchweight).
                Golovkin/K2 would much rather have those fights too. Unfortunately Canelo "needs" more time and Jacobs is in the PBC. So that means the only other option is Saunders since a title unification overrides his mandatory, which is Johnson. If Golovkin can't fight a title holder he'll have to fight Johnson or be stripped.

                Comment


                • #78
                  Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
                  hahahah did you really reply to yourself?

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    Originally posted by daggum View Post
                    marg was ranked #1 in 2004, 2005, 2006. marg didn't lose until midway in 2007 and that was after floyd had fought oscar. please do better research so you can undrstand the timeline better. floyd chose to fight unranked sharmba, zab coming off an embarrassing loss, and an unknown journeyman instead of margarito who was ranked #1 that entire time. building the fight...dame un break! he fougth zab coming off a loss to a bum but he couldn't fight marg coming off a loss to top contender williams? that's nonsensical. even after marg lost he still came back to become #1 but floyd was retired. was he still buidling the fight?
                    so therefore he was under the lineal champion..he was ranekd number 1, but the lineal champ was more important...
                    floyd got his first title from zab..they said floyd why do u fight zab and not the guy that beat him live on espn..floyd went and beat him as well...then he fought oscar at 154..and margo went an lost follwing that fight..
                    floyd was signed to fight zab before zab lost and they just restructured the deal to give floyd more..
                    margo no longer had his title...zab still had one of his titles and floyd took it but vacated bc he couldnt do a mandatory bc he was fighting oscar for big money....either way margo was not going to be next bc he woul dhave to drop his title to fight margo or be stripped...

                    all margo had to keep doing was winning..if he's not ranked high no more that is his fault not floyd..if floyd was signed to fight him it would have happened but he was not..

                    dont argue for a man who put cement in his gloves bro

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      True hater right here in the flesh. **** off fan boy

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP