Duva makes her case for Kovalev being better than GGG
Collapse
-
-
She missed Ouma who was IBF world champ + Murray robbed twice.
GGG already beaten 8 top10, including 4 world champs, 15 defenses so 5 wins more to b-hop's record, never even been down in 400 fights, Amateur legend 345-5, olympic silver medal, world amateur gold, AND finally ducked by almost everyone.
Now u dont need me to show u the list of pussies again, do u ??Comment
-
Imo GGG da better fighter. ..Kovalev does have da better resume right now...still give 3G da edge..just see that it factor in him..he cuts da ring off better than any1 ..plus 3G jab is imo da best in da game...also 3G never seems to be out off balance.Comment
-
-
Kovalev obviously has a better resume, no one will dispute that. And because of that no one can really argue Kovalev doesn't deserve to be ranked higher p4p, I certainly think the Krusher deserves the #2-#3 spot.
I think Golovkin is the better fighter of the two but unfortunately for Golovkin he didn't have a Pascal and a Hopkins in his division willing to fight him so that Golovkin could prove it, not yet anyways. It's too bad Sergio Martinez didn't have the courage that Bernard Hopkins had who unlike Sergio actually fought the "Golovkin" of his division in Kovalev, and did so just a few months shy of 50!!! It's a damn shame the middleweight division doesn't have more Bernard Hopkins and less Peter Quillin's (guys who avoid challenges).Comment
-
That is 100 % false and slander please delete that postShe missed Ouma who was IBF world champ + Murray robbed twice.
GGG already beaten 8 top10, including 4 world champs, 15 defenses so 5 wins more to b-hop's record, never even been down in 400 fights, Amateur legend 345-5, olympic silver medal, world amateur gold, AND finally ducked by almost everyone.
Now u dont need me to show u the list of pussies again, do u ??Comment
-
Those fights happened because kov was willing to take less money and be the B side. Gg has moved more money than his opponents in every fight he refuses to acknowledge that in some situations he would be the B sideKovalev obviously has a better resume, no one will dispute that. And because of that no one can really argue Kovalev doesn't deserve to be ranked higher p4p, I certainly think the Krusher deserves the #2-#3 spot.
I think Golovkin is the better fighter of the two but unfortunately for Golovkin he didn't have a Pascal and a Hopkins in his division willing to fight him so that Golovkin could prove it, not yet anyways. It's too bad Sergio Martinez didn't have the courage that Bernard Hopkins had who unlike Sergio actually fought the "Golovkin" of his division in Kovalev, and did so just a few months shy of 50!!! It's a damn shame the middleweight division doesn't have more Bernard Hopkins and less Peter Quillin's (guys who avoid challenges).Comment
-
Comment
Comment