The Reason Muhammad Ali Is Better Than Floyd Mayweather

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • KLockard23
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Oct 2015
    • 791
    • 30
    • 3
    • 7,162

    #1

    The Reason Muhammad Ali Is Better Than Floyd Mayweather

    Because he couldn't beat Muhammad Ali in a boxing match, especially a prime Ali. It's just that simple.

    In my opinion, to be the 'best' of anything concerning fighting, you have to be able to defeat EVERYBODY, no matter what their size, weight, or strength is. Imagine someone walking around on the street saying that they were the greatest fighter in the world or the baddest person in the world. You would naturally interpret them as meaning that they could beat anyone and everyone that they came across. If they were to then say that "No, I mean I'm the greatest fighter or the baddest person in the world when fighting guys that are only my same size and weight", you would . Because that's not truly being the best fighter in the world then, is it?

    Ali was a HEAVYWEIGHT. So we know he can stand toe to toe with smaller boxers as well as the big ones. Can Floyd, at his size, defeat Muhammad Ali, whether it be the 60's Ali or the 70's Ali? If not, then how can be 'better'?
  • -Kev-
    this is boxing
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2006
    • 39960
    • 5,045
    • 1,449
    • 234,543

    #2
    Tyson Fury is the GOAT. No boxer in history can beat him.

    Comment

    • AllEyesOpen
      Speech Cobra
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2006
      • 5993
      • 195
      • 517
      • 13,538

      #3
      Okay, then prime Andre the Giant is the best ever.

      Comment

      • KLockard23
        Interim Champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Oct 2015
        • 791
        • 30
        • 3
        • 7,162

        #4
        Originally posted by AllEyesOpen
        Okay, then prime Andre the Giant is the best ever.
        lol He's not even a boxer...

        I'm mainly saying this because more than anything else, Floyd seems to point towards his 0 as his proof that he's TBE. He says no fighter can beat him, and that he would always find a way to win no matter what the opponent. I'm just injecting some reality into it for the sake of discussion.

        Comment

        • -PBP-
          32 Time World Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jan 2012
          • 24107
          • 836
          • 635
          • 34,297

          #5
          The Real Reason Why Deontay Wilder is Better Than Sugar Ray Robinson


          Because he couldn't beat Deontay Wilder in a boxing match, especially a prime Wilder. It's just that simple.

          In my opinion, to be the 'best' of anything concerning fighting, you have to be able to defeat EVERYBODY, no matter what their size, weight, or strength is. Imagine someone walking around on the street saying that they were the greatest fighter in the world or the baddest person in the world. You would naturally interpret them as meaning that they could beat anyone and everyone that they came across. If they were to then say that "No, I mean I'm the greatest fighter or the baddest person in the world when fighting guys that are only my same size and weight", you would . Because that's not truly being the best fighter in the world then, is it?

          Wilder is a HEAVYWEIGHT. So we know he can stand toe to toe with smaller boxers as well as the big ones. Can Robinson, at his size, defeat Deontay Wilder, whether it be the 2000's Wilder or the 2020's Wilder? If not, then how can be 'better'?

          Comment

          • KLockard23
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Oct 2015
            • 791
            • 30
            • 3
            • 7,162

            #6
            Originally posted by PBP.
            The Real Reason Why Deontay Wilder is Better Than Sugar Ray Robinson


            Because he couldn't beat Deontay Wilder in a boxing match, especially a prime Wilder. It's just that simple.

            In my opinion, to be the 'best' of anything concerning fighting, you have to be able to defeat EVERYBODY, no matter what their size, weight, or strength is. Imagine someone walking around on the street saying that they were the greatest fighter in the world or the baddest person in the world. You would naturally interpret them as meaning that they could beat anyone and everyone that they came across. If they were to then say that "No, I mean I'm the greatest fighter or the baddest person in the world when fighting guys that are only my same size and weight", you would . Because that's not truly being the best fighter in the world then, is it?

            Wilder is a HEAVYWEIGHT. So we know he can stand toe to toe with smaller boxers as well as the big ones. Can Robinson, at his size, defeat Deontay Wilder, whether it be the 2000's Wilder or the 2020's Wilder? If not, then how can be 'better'?
            lol

            But it's a good point...

            Comment

            • b00g13man
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Dec 2012
              • 12197
              • 265
              • 51
              • 34,905

              #7
              What a ****ing dumb thread.

              Comment

              • KLockard23
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Oct 2015
                • 791
                • 30
                • 3
                • 7,162

                #8
                Originally posted by b00g13man
                What a ****ing dumb thread.
                Says the guy/gal who adds nothing to the discussion. :bukkake:

                Comment

                • b00g13man
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Dec 2012
                  • 12197
                  • 265
                  • 51
                  • 34,905

                  #9
                  Originally posted by KLockard23
                  Says the guy/gal who adds nothing to the discussion. :bukkake:
                  There's nothing to add or discuss. It's a dumb thread.

                  Comment

                  • Scary
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jul 2008
                    • 3718
                    • 144
                    • 276
                    • 15,097

                    #10
                    Why am I even writing in such a dumb thread.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP