Comments Thread For: Billy Joe Saunders Drops, Decisions Andy Lee To Win WBO Belt

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Shadoww702
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2015
    • 41176
    • 4,546
    • 2,938
    • 250,035

    #61
    Originally posted by OnePunch
    huh?? You prefer a belt being held hostage and defended for years against c-grade MANDATORY slobs ?

    you must have taken quite a few "hits" tonite......
    F'k NO!!! I would rather they dump that **** and take REAL fights instead!!!

    Roy Jones was BURIED for doing this back in the day. So FK YOU and your SHTY "Mandatories".

    So FKN glad didn't have to hear how big BAD ass Lee was like you did Mario Lemuix. Who was KTFO by Ricky Martin Rubio...

    Comment

    • Progrssive_Jedi
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Aug 2015
      • 3360
      • 140
      • 37
      • 10,393

      #62
      Originally posted by 285Kid
      LOL GGG better start thinking about movie to 168, Noway he getting a chance at the WBO now + WBC is at 155
      GGG v Canelo is gonna be at 160. And don't be surprised if Saunders actually does go for the GGG fight.

      Originally posted by Wolfert
      113-113

      Golovkin can flush his unification plan.

      Predicting BJS vs Macklin, Eubank Jr 2, Geale, Blackwell, Ryder.
      You'd like that wouldn't you. It's boxing, what people say and what they really want is often not the same thing.

      Originally posted by hitking
      And Jacobs sounds like Eubanks is gonna be his next fight. So if that's the case, pretty sure is aimming for their own lil "unification" at the end of next year. Like I've said before, GGG is piss'n in the wind with the unification garbage.
      GGG will have 3/4 of the belts this September. Aft that, it isn't that much long that Saunders public ally said he'd be ready for GGG.

      But hey, any kind of setback is a victory to the GGG hate squad, in reality, GGG is backed by some heavy hitters.

      Comment

      • hitking
        Undisputed Champion
        • May 2010
        • 11467
        • 444
        • 0
        • 36,048

        #63
        Originally posted by OnePunch
        huh?? You prefer a belt being held hostage and defended for the next 2 years against c-grade slobs instead of a potential middleweight unification?


        you must have taken quite a few "hits" tonite......
        I don't care about the belt. I also don't care about seeing GGG fight a guy that's been KO'd by Brian Vera, Chavez Jr, and fought the recently KO'd Quillen to a draw. He's a bum. And just because you put "unification" on the poster doesn't change that. Saunders is an undefeated fighter and new blood for the division.

        Comment

        • Russian Crushin
          atheist with a gun
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Dec 2009
          • 33788
          • 1,471
          • 836
          • 46,625

          #64
          Originally posted by hitking
          I don't care about the belt. I also don't care about seeing GGG fight a guy that's been KO'd by Brian Vera, Chavez Jr, and fought the recently KO'd Quillen to a draw. He's a bum. And just because you put "unification" on the poster doesn't change that. Saunders is an undefeated fighter and new blood for the division.
          New blood? He's like canelo but a grade lower. Do the least possible to win what should be a pretty easy fight. What was he doing most of the fight, he did not want to commit 98% of the time.

          Comment

          • hitking
            Undisputed Champion
            • May 2010
            • 11467
            • 444
            • 0
            • 36,048

            #65
            Originally posted by Progrssive_Jedi
            GGG will have 3/4 of the belts this September. Aft that, it isn't that much long that Saunders public ally said he'd be ready for GGG.

            But hey, any kind of setback is a victory to the GGG hate squad, in reality, GGG is backed by some heavy hitters.
            I really don't understand why its so hard for you to understand that some of us don't care about belts. I see Saunders winning as a win for GGG because he's a new, undefeated contender. We already know what Lee is. And for us that don't care about belts, Lee is a bum that's already been exposed as C class. At least GGG can be the one to expose Saunders.

            Comment

            • hitking
              Undisputed Champion
              • May 2010
              • 11467
              • 444
              • 0
              • 36,048

              #66
              Originally posted by Russian Crushin
              New blood? He's like canelo but a grade lower. Do the least possible to win what should be a pretty easy fight. What was he doing most of the fight, he did not want to commit 98% of the time.
              How many fights has he lost again???

              Comment

              • kingzapata02
                Contender
                • Dec 2011
                • 268
                • 16
                • 8
                • 7,077

                #67
                This remined me of the pacauico vs Marquez fights 1 and 2. Very close rounds but I felt lee won most of them but the knockdowns were the difference. Great fight! The telecast didn't show the compubox. Does anyone have it?

                Comment

                • OnePunch
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • May 2008
                  • 9103
                  • 1,302
                  • 767
                  • 2,453,131

                  #68
                  Originally posted by hitking
                  I really don't understand why its so hard for you to understand that some of us don't care about belts. I see Saunders winning as a win for GGG because he's a new, undefeated contender. We already know what Lee is. And for us that don't care about belts, Lee is a bum that's already been exposed as C class. At least GGG can be the one to expose Saunders.
                  yeah, a new, undefeated contender who already said he doesnt want to even be in the same area code with ggg..........

                  Comment

                  • Scipio2009
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Apr 2014
                    • 13741
                    • 276
                    • 64
                    • 98,172

                    #69
                    Originally posted by Eastcoast
                    I said if HBO does. You don't know what they'll front, they could step up and write it off as a marketing investment for the Golovkin/Canelo ppv. Showtime didn't even front the full $3mill for the abysmal <400k ratings garnered by Quillin/Jacobs, Al subsidized their pay.

                    Meantime Danny's talking like a guy who doesn't want to test himself.

                    Why would Al Haymon subsidize the only domestic channel still purchasing fights from him? please think before you start arguing a point.

                    Showtime laid out likely $3m for Stiverne-Wilder among $3m for Jacobs-Quillin, among other choice showdowns that they put the money up for.

                    Can you point to a single card that HBO has even paid out $3m for?

                    Comment

                    • hitking
                      Undisputed Champion
                      • May 2010
                      • 11467
                      • 444
                      • 0
                      • 36,048

                      #70
                      Originally posted by OnePunch
                      yeah, a new, undefeated contender who already said he doesnt want to even be in the same area code with ggg..........
                      Move up......

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP