Boxingscene Boxer of the Year for 2015
Collapse
-
-
Yeah. The same 14 guys who 11/14 picked Wlad to win, said "If Fury's victory had been more impressive..."
Comment
-
i'd give fury credit if the win was impressive, too. what impressed you other than the color of his trunks?
he did next to nothing to beat a 40 year old who is on his way out
. nobody but the brits were impressed by that fight.
Comment
-
Beating an old faded pacquiao without a KO in half a decade, on his way out AND stinking the place out at the same time.
#stuffoflegendsComment
-
never said mayweather had a legendary year. this is caleld a "straw man argument." he clearly had a better year than fury.
you're absolutely bonkers if you think that the pacquiao that mayweather fought was a lesser quantity than the wladimir fury fought. faded manny > faded wladimir. manny's '14 win over bradley in the second fight is better than any win on wladimir's resume.
why do you think klitschko is a better win than manny pacquiao?Comment
-
Because he wasn't removed from his senses 3 fights ago? or looked awful against the same guy in the fight prior. or lost against tim bradley.never said mayweather had a legendary year. this is caleld a "straw man argument." he clearly had a better year than fury.
you're absolutely bonkers if you think that the pacquiao that mayweather fought was a lesser quantity than the wladimir fury fought. faded manny > faded wladimir. manny's '14 win over bradley in the second fight is better than any win on wladimir's resume.
why do you think klitschko is a better win than manny pacquiao?
Pacquiao hasn't looked great since losing probably Cotto in 2009.Comment
-
pacquiao didn't lose to tim bradley
. he beat him twice! the first fight was an absolutely bonkers decision, and manny got the nod in the second fight.
do you even watch the nonbritish fighters? you can be honest. i've heard that you guys get a 32 bit feed and still have to pay 20 pounds sterling! i wouldn't do that either!
you really think an old, faded wladimir is better than an old, faded manny?
or that the wladimir that fought fury is a better fighter p4p than the manny who beat bradley?
i thought you were better than this
make your case. love to hear it. why was wladimir a better win than manny?Comment
-
Was Klitschko not ranked P4P #1 on most people's list? Certainly higher than Pacquiao.pacquiao didn't lose to tim bradley
. he beat him twice! the first fight was an absolutely bonkers decision, and manny got the nod in the second fight.
do you even watch the nonbritish fighters? you can be honest. i've heard that you guys get a 32 bit feed and still have to pay 20 pounds sterling! i wouldn't do that either!
you really think an old, faded wladimir is better than an old, faded manny?
or that the wladimir that fought fury is a better fighter p4p than the manny who beat bradley?
i thought you were better than this
make your case. love to hear it. why was wladimir a better win than manny?
Forget Bradley then. Pacquaio was laid out a couple of fights ago. Removed from his senses. No KO or destructive performance in 5+ years.
Not many thought Pacquiao could beat Mayweather, everybody incl yourself were convinced Klitschko would beat up Fury.
I don't need to make a case. But seeing your response is quite amusing.Comment
-
He wasn't. Pacquiao was #2 on most though iirc.Was Klitschko not ranked P4P #1 on most people's list? Certainly higher than Pacquiao.
Forget Bradley then. Pacquaio was laid out a couple of fights ago. Removed from his senses. No KO or destructive performance in 5+ years.
Not many thought Pacquiao could beat Mayweather, everybody incl yourself were convinced Klitschko would beat up Fury.
I don't need to make a case. But seeing your response is quite amusing.Comment
Comment