Boxingscene Boxer of the Year for 2015

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • New England
    Strong champion.
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2010
    • 37514
    • 1,927
    • 1,486
    • 97,173

    #141
    Originally posted by LacedUp
    Posters have more sense than the writers.


    because they voted for tyson fury ?


    it's probably a bunch of brits, anti black crusaders, etc. this is NSB. these guys don't have more sense than freaking credentialed BWAA guys

    Comment

    • LacedUp
      Still Smokin'
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2009
      • 29171
      • 781
      • 381
      • 132,163

      #142
      Originally posted by New England
      because they voted for tyson fury ?


      it's probably a bunch of brits, anti black crusaders, etc. this is NSB. these guys don't have more sense than freaking credentialed BWAA guys
      Yeah. The same 14 guys who 11/14 picked Wlad to win, said "If Fury's victory had been more impressive..."

      Comment

      • New England
        Strong champion.
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Oct 2010
        • 37514
        • 1,927
        • 1,486
        • 97,173

        #143
        Originally posted by LacedUp
        Yeah. The same 14 guys who 11/14 picked Wlad to win, said "If Fury's victory had been more impressive..."


        i'd give fury credit if the win was impressive, too. what impressed you other than the color of his trunks?


        he did next to nothing to beat a 40 year old who is on his way out . nobody but the brits were impressed by that fight.

        Comment

        • LacedUp
          Still Smokin'
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Oct 2009
          • 29171
          • 781
          • 381
          • 132,163

          #144
          Originally posted by New England
          i'd give fury credit if the win was impressive, too. what impressed you other than the color of his trunks?


          he did next to nothing to beat a 40 year old who is on his way out . nobody but the brits were impressed by that fight.
          Beating an old faded pacquiao without a KO in half a decade, on his way out AND stinking the place out at the same time.

          #stuffoflegends

          Comment

          • New England
            Strong champion.
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2010
            • 37514
            • 1,927
            • 1,486
            • 97,173

            #145
            Originally posted by LacedUp
            Beating an old faded pacquiao without a KO in half a decade, on his way out AND stinking the place out at the same time.

            #stuffoflegends

            never said mayweather had a legendary year. this is caleld a "straw man argument." he clearly had a better year than fury.

            you're absolutely bonkers if you think that the pacquiao that mayweather fought was a lesser quantity than the wladimir fury fought. faded manny > faded wladimir. manny's '14 win over bradley in the second fight is better than any win on wladimir's resume.


            why do you think klitschko is a better win than manny pacquiao?

            Comment

            • LacedUp
              Still Smokin'
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2009
              • 29171
              • 781
              • 381
              • 132,163

              #146
              Originally posted by New England
              never said mayweather had a legendary year. this is caleld a "straw man argument." he clearly had a better year than fury.

              you're absolutely bonkers if you think that the pacquiao that mayweather fought was a lesser quantity than the wladimir fury fought. faded manny > faded wladimir. manny's '14 win over bradley in the second fight is better than any win on wladimir's resume.


              why do you think klitschko is a better win than manny pacquiao?
              Because he wasn't removed from his senses 3 fights ago? or looked awful against the same guy in the fight prior. or lost against tim bradley.

              Pacquiao hasn't looked great since losing probably Cotto in 2009.

              Comment

              • New England
                Strong champion.
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Oct 2010
                • 37514
                • 1,927
                • 1,486
                • 97,173

                #147
                Originally posted by LacedUp
                Because he wasn't removed from his senses 3 fights ago? or looked awful against the same guy in the fight prior. or lost against tim bradley.

                Pacquiao hasn't looked great since losing probably Cotto in 2009.


                pacquiao didn't lose to tim bradley . he beat him twice! the first fight was an absolutely bonkers decision, and manny got the nod in the second fight.

                do you even watch the nonbritish fighters? you can be honest. i've heard that you guys get a 32 bit feed and still have to pay 20 pounds sterling! i wouldn't do that either!


                you really think an old, faded wladimir is better than an old, faded manny?
                or that the wladimir that fought fury is a better fighter p4p than the manny who beat bradley?


                i thought you were better than this


                make your case. love to hear it. why was wladimir a better win than manny?

                Comment

                • Æthelstan
                  Banned
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Aug 2013
                  • 411
                  • 179
                  • 1,038
                  • 634

                  #148
                  Fury is the clear winner.. most significant win of the year

                  odds makers predicted he'd lose

                  Comment

                  • LacedUp
                    Still Smokin'
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Oct 2009
                    • 29171
                    • 781
                    • 381
                    • 132,163

                    #149
                    Originally posted by New England
                    pacquiao didn't lose to tim bradley . he beat him twice! the first fight was an absolutely bonkers decision, and manny got the nod in the second fight.

                    do you even watch the nonbritish fighters? you can be honest. i've heard that you guys get a 32 bit feed and still have to pay 20 pounds sterling! i wouldn't do that either!


                    you really think an old, faded wladimir is better than an old, faded manny?
                    or that the wladimir that fought fury is a better fighter p4p than the manny who beat bradley?


                    i thought you were better than this


                    make your case. love to hear it. why was wladimir a better win than manny?
                    Was Klitschko not ranked P4P #1 on most people's list? Certainly higher than Pacquiao.

                    Forget Bradley then. Pacquaio was laid out a couple of fights ago. Removed from his senses. No KO or destructive performance in 5+ years.

                    Not many thought Pacquiao could beat Mayweather, everybody incl yourself were convinced Klitschko would beat up Fury.

                    I don't need to make a case. But seeing your response is quite amusing.

                    Comment

                    • b00g13man
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Dec 2012
                      • 12197
                      • 265
                      • 51
                      • 34,905

                      #150
                      Originally posted by LacedUp
                      Was Klitschko not ranked P4P #1 on most people's list? Certainly higher than Pacquiao.

                      Forget Bradley then. Pacquaio was laid out a couple of fights ago. Removed from his senses. No KO or destructive performance in 5+ years.

                      Not many thought Pacquiao could beat Mayweather, everybody incl yourself were convinced Klitschko would beat up Fury.

                      I don't need to make a case. But seeing your response is quite amusing.
                      He wasn't. Pacquiao was #2 on most though iirc.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP