Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

stop the madnesss, GGG doesnt have 15 title defenses and isnt close to any record

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by therealpugilist View Post
    after he beat Holmes and Trinidad he was the one true champion....he defended 6 times.....vs ODLH, Joppy, Robert Allen, Carl Daniels, Morrade Hakkar and Howard Eastman



    Everything else was just defenses of the IBF trinket....their were too many belts and titleholders floating around from 1995-2001 just to say Hopkins was the champion......he proved it in the ring in 2001
    And this is what the Bumlovkinites refuse to acknowledge. Titles are won and lost IN THE RING. The trinkets handed out by the alphabet organizations are *meaningless*...

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by therealpugilist View Post
      BRUUUUUUUUH.....You beat the champion in the ring....you dont get credit for not making fights or them not happnening, why is that so hard for people on this forum to understand :bukkake:
      You don't get credit for not making fights, but you should get credit for being willing to fight and trying to make them.

      This is what many fans, including me, like about GGG. We know he would fight the other MW belt holders in a heart beat, if they had the balls to fight him.

      It's impossible to beat a champion in the ring if he won't fight you.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by kafkod View Post
        You don't get credit for not making fights, but you should get credit for being willing to fight and trying to make them.

        This is what many fans, including me, like about GGG. We know he would fight the other MW belt holders in a heart beat, if they had the balls to fight him.

        It's impossible to beat a champion in the ring if he won't fight you.
        But but but Ward!! But Lara!!

        They are just ****ing ******, it doesn't matter how many times you say it they just refuse to understand. With Jacobs beating Quillin now they say Jacobs is better than GGG. It's laughable.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by kafkod View Post
          It's impossible to beat a champion in the ring if he won't fight you.
          This is a sorry excuse parroted by the Bumlovkinites. If there is no public demand for the champion to fight Bumlovkin then the champion has no obligation to fight Bumlovkin. The champion has an obligation to fight the fights which the public demand. IOW, the fights which make the most money. If Bumlovkin were a bigger draw [ie the object of the public's demand] then he would have already gotten his 160lb lineal championship fight. 97k PPVs buys says that the public doesn't give a **** about the Triple Duck...

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by _Maxi View Post
            But but but Ward!! But Lara!!

            They are just ****ing ******, it doesn't matter how many times you say it they just refuse to understand. With Jacobs beating Quillin now they say Jacobs is better than GGG. It's laughable.
            Jacobs KO1 Quillin is better than anything on Bumlovkin's resume...

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Nay_Sayer View Post
              This is a sorry excuse parroted by the Bumlovkinites. If there is no public demand for the champion to fight Bumlovkin then the champion has no obligation to fight Bumlovkin. The champion has an obligation to fight the fights which the public demand. IOW, the fights which make the most money. If Bumlovkin were a bigger draw [ie the object of the public's demand] then he would have already gotten his 160lb lineal championship fight. 97k PPVs buys says that the public doesn't give a **** about the Triple Duck...
              It was 150k ppv, as you know.

              And that was just the live US audience. Over 20 millions viewers world wide, sold out MSG, and the threads you guys keep starting about him here proves that the public do give a shit about Golovkin.

              Comment


              • #37
                You can't accept step aside fees and claim ducking, you're making an agreement not to fight.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Nay_Sayer View Post
                  You have just contradicted yourself. How is it that nobody wanted to fight Bumlovkin and yet you're critical of him for not fighting Lara and Ward? It seems to me like Lara and Ward wanted to fight so your argument that "nobody wanted to fight" is dead in the water...
                  Yeah that is contradictory but let me explain, if GGG wants too become undisputed champ I'll give him a pass on Lara and Ward .....for now... If he fights Nelo, Lee, Johnson( his Mando) or Jacobs( his other Mando) next I'm OK with that, if not then fight Lara, Andrade, Chunky or Jack( Ward moved up sad to say).

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by _Maxi View Post
                    But but but Ward!! But Lara!!

                    They are just ****ing ******, it doesn't matter how many times you say it they just refuse to understand. With Jacobs beating Quillin now they say Jacobs is better than GGG. It's laughable.
                    Originally posted by Nay_Sayer View Post
                    Jacobs KO1 Quillin is better than anything on Bumlovkin's resume...
                    Yeah right!

                    Stand by for about a hundred "Bumlovkin is ducking Jacobs" threads, coming to you from the muppet show.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Nay_Sayer View Post
                      Jacobs KO1 Quillin is better than anything on Bumlovkin's resume...
                      I totally agree

                      GGG hasn't ktfo of a top middleweight in 3 or less rounds let alone 1

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP