Cotto can't escape his contract, pays GGG his 800k step aside fee

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • M Bison
    Perfect, but you're not
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Mar 2012
    • 15677
    • 599
    • 798
    • 32,424

    #31
    Paid 800k to masquerade around as a fake WBC champ? Oh boy!

    Comment

    • Trinidad_Fan
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Apr 2013
      • 428
      • 22
      • 13
      • 6,612

      #32
      Cotto hating is a fulltime job.
      LOL.

      Comment

      • OnePunch
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • May 2008
        • 9081
        • 1,295
        • 748
        • 2,453,131

        #33
        Originally posted by Eastcoast
        Well maybe not. Golden Boy is currently suing Roc Nation over all this.
        well considering Canelo currently has the title, and won it in the fight, I'm not sure how they could substantiate any "damages".

        If they are trying to claim the fight would have done more buys had Cotto not vacated, then good luck trying to prove that lol

        Comment

        • boliodogs
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • May 2008
          • 33358
          • 824
          • 1,782
          • 309,589

          #34
          Good. Cotto always gets his way so it's good to see him have to keep his word and live up to what he agreed to do in writing.

          Comment

          • AddiX
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Dec 2009
            • 7865
            • 416
            • 45
            • 30,565

            #35
            When people talk about the lack of big names on GGG resume, your a moron if you don't see how hard the entire division ducks this man.

            Comment

            • Eastcoast
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Aug 2014
              • 8639
              • 288
              • 0
              • 15,501

              #36
              Originally posted by OnePunch
              well considering Canelo currently has the title, and won it in the fight, I'm not sure how they could substantiate any "damages".

              If they are trying to claim the fight would have done more buys had Cotto not vacated, then good luck trying to prove that lol
              Steve Kim reported that once Cotto dropped the title, GB started contesting the split ratio, now it's going to court. I imagine GB will argue they would've fought Cotto without the title on the line as they tried the year before when Cotto decided to fight Martinez instead. Cotto was using the belt as a marketing tool then dropped it prior to the event.

              Comment

              • .:: JSFD26 ::.
                Brawski
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Mar 2012
                • 33329
                • 725
                • 432
                • 44,762

                #37
                Originally posted by Eff Pandas
                How that $800k fee was even being disputed was weird to me, but good to hear Cotto did the right thing as GGG had nothing to do with the Cotto vs the WBC sanctioning fee bs.
                The right thing? If it was down in a contract he HAD TO do it.
                Originally posted by US Dirk Killer



                Well, at least he still saved 300k for vacating doe
                Good bidniss moves by Miguel Cotto.

                Vacated the belt only to still end up paying 800k.

                Comment

                • SUBZER0ED
                  Be water, my friend.
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Feb 2013
                  • 11013
                  • 2,374
                  • 1,764
                  • 34,667

                  #38
                  I think at some point shortly before the fight, Cotto realized he probably wouldn't beat Canelo. He had already agreed to pay GGG a step-aside fee, but upon realizing he would lose to Canelo, he tried to get the sanctioning fee reduced. When that failed, he just refused to pay it. He was already going to be out $800k, why pay an additional $300k to keep the belt that he knew he would soon lose to Canelo? After the WBC stripped Cotto, he figured he didn't need to pay Golovkin the $800k (he said he was keeping the 1.1mill in his bank account). He must have forgotten about a little something called legal obligation and a potential lawsuit for failing to live up to it.

                  Comment

                  • DeadLikeMe
                    ................
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Dec 2011
                    • 11968
                    • 748
                    • 1,409
                    • 26,662

                    #39
                    Originally posted by AddiX
                    When people talk about the lack of big names on GGG resume, your a moron if you don't see how hard the entire division ducks this man.
                    Spoken like a true GGG fan

                    Comment

                    • Eastcoast
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Aug 2014
                      • 8639
                      • 288
                      • 0
                      • 15,501

                      #40
                      Originally posted by .:: JSFD26 ::.
                      The right thing? If it was down in a contract he HAD TO do it.

                      Good bidniss moves by Miguel Cotto.

                      Vacated the belt only to still end up paying 800k.
                      It was just a $800k 'Don't kill me I just need leverage over Canelo' fee.


                      That kind of indicts him in the GB/RN lawsuit. Cotto paid Golovkin $800k in order to gain a split advantage over Canelo. GB is arguing that w/o the belt the split would've been more fair.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP