Comments Thread For: Source: Canelo, Golovkin Clash Not in Play For May
Collapse
-
-
The champ pays the step aside. Cotto was the champ, that was on him.
The articles in my post you're replying to states there was a verbal contract. If there was no verbal contract why are they even negotiating in the first place? If there was no verbal agreement GBP/Canelo wouldn't be negotiating with GGG to step aside once again. Don't try to change the facts.
and by the way chris mannix can post whatever he wants on twitter, that doesnt make it a verbal contract... none of the other links show anything above a verbal contract, will you post the actual info, or are you just making schitt up?...Comment
-
They have to find a reason to justify their hate. Everybody knows that if he refuses a deal for a September fight and Canelo got stripped, they would be going on and on about "paper champ dont want actual fight blah blah". Even Big Dunn tries to claim ggg is paper champ in WBA because he was elevated to super champ. What he forgets is that ggg won the EXACT same belt jacobs has around his waist, and the wba only elevated ggg so they could sell the regular belt to someone else. Dunn even said in a thread something to the effect of "too bad ggg didnt win his belt in the ring like jacobs did" lol haha idiots
You and the truth should finally meet sometime and get to know each other.Last edited by The Big Dunn; 12-11-2015, 02:59 PM.Comment
-
You just repeated what I said. The reason they're negotiating is because the winner had a verbal agreement to face GGG next. The fight wouldn't have happened if not for that agreement. That was promised to GGG (and the step-aside fee from Cotto) in order for him to allow the fight to happen. GGG allowed that fight to be for the MW championship because he was promised the winner would fight him next or vacate the belt, unless they can come to an agreement.Last edited by about.thousands; 12-11-2015, 03:02 PM.Comment
-
There is no difference in how each became WBA champ. The only difference at all is that the WBA then elevate ggg to "super" champ. And if they hadnt, Jacobs wouldnt be champ nowComment
-
You just repeated what I said. The reason they're negotiating is because the winner had a verbal agreement to face GGG next. The fight wouldn't have happened if not for that agreement. That was promised to GGG (and the step-aside fee from Cotto) in order for him to allow the fight to happen. GGG allowed that fight to be for the MW championship because he was promised the winner would fight him next or vacate the belt.Last edited by icha; 12-11-2015, 03:08 PM.Comment
-
lol, is like the boxing world revolves around ggg... GGG had a verbal agreement from cotto(not canelo) in order to allow cotto to put the title at stake for that fight, the fight was going to happen with or without the title, both cotto and canelo are bigger than a title...Comment
-
lol, is like the boxing world revolves around ggg... GGG had a verbal agreement from cotto(not canelo) in order to allow cotto to put the title at stake for that fight, the fight was going to happen with or without the title, both cotto and canelo are bigger than a title... canelo did not made ggg any promises, it was the wbc...Comment
-
yes, that is incorrect. He knocked out Nilson Tapia for the vacant WBA regular belt. The EXACT SAME BELT that Jacobs won vs Fletcher (also vacant)
There is no difference in how each became WBA champ. The only difference at all is that the WBA then elevate ggg to "super" champ. And if they hadnt, Jacobs wouldnt be champ now
Dude, the truth must be on the side of milk cartons in your house.Comment
Comment