Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Source: Canelo, Golovkin Clash Not in Play For May

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Originally posted by bigdunny1 View Post
    That's because canelo will fight ggg.
    care to share the lotto numbers for tomorrow???

    Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
    Well let's see if GGG and his team are ok with it. If they are want the fight...or the belt.
    That's exactly my point I'm trying to get across. All that **** talking cuz they wanted the belt next..... just to take another step aside bs and wait some more. Bunch of hypocrites.

    Comment


    • #82
      Originally posted by _Maxi View Post
      I'm a GGG fan. If they agree to fight on september 2016, I'm ok. Why? because GGG deserves a good payday, around 5 millions. If it's needed to wait a few more months I'm ok with that, as long as they fight at 160.

      Once GGG gets the good payday he DESERVES (less skilled fighters have earned much more than what he's earned so far) I think he will eventually move up to 168 unless he still have good fights at 160.

      So yeah, I'm ok with them fighting in september if it's ok. In the meantime he can fight Lee or Jacobs which are good fights too.
      I don't know about "deserves." Not like he's beaten some top, feared opposition.

      But really my post was with regard to what they want -- big money or unification? They use both interchangeably depending on who they do(n't) wanna fight.

      Comment


      • #83
        bigjavi973 you are so short minded my friend.

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
          I don't know about "deserves." Not like he's beaten some top, feared opposition.

          But really my post was with regard to what they want -- big money or unification? They use both interchangeably depending on who they do(n't) wanna fight.
          They want BOTH. They can unificate with Lee in March and then unificate with Canelo in September. What will be your answer now? you will criticize it whatever GGG does.

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by _Maxi View Post
            bigjavi973 you are so short minded my friend.
            no.....

            I'm not a flip flopper or a hypocrite.

            I was even saying that Cotto should fight GGG a while ago & that if he won the canelo fight that the ggg fight SHOULD be next.

            I stayed in that same mind frame the entire time, while some others flip flop depending on what situations turn out.

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by _Maxi View Post
              They want BOTH. They can unificate with Lee in March and then unificate with Canelo in September. What will be your answer now? you will criticize it whatever GGG does.
              I'd love that. If Canelo continues to impress, that would be a great year for GGG. But he'll probably have to do it at 155. Can't have a weak ass resume, weak ass PPV #'s and think you can call shots.

              Comment


              • #87
                The GGG hate squad will squak no matter what.

                If GGG agrees to a step-aside and a September fight, then hes a liar who doesnt really "want the belts" but just wants money

                If GGG refused the step aside and forced Canelo to get stripped, then hes afraid of the fight and would rather be elevated to full champ than win it in the ring


                So no matter which way he goes, the haters are gonna hate.

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
                  I'd love that. If Canelo continues to impress, that would be a great year for GGG. But he'll probably have to do it at 155. Can't have a weak ass resume, weak ass PPV #'s and think you can call shots.
                  I knew you would bull**** somehow in your response. The fight won't be at 155, mark my words. It will be at least at 158. And GGG doesn't have a weak ass resume, he's beaten top10 guys. We don't wanna have this discussion again do we? not your fault when everyone avoids you. Silver medal, 345-5 amateur record. Never been KD. Pretty much Never lost a single round in his entire career. An avoided monster. 20+ KO in row.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by _Maxi View Post
                    I knew you would bull**** somehow in your response. The fight won't be at 155, mark my words. It will be at least at 158. And GGG doesn't have a weak ass resume, he's beaten top10 guys. We don't wanna have this discussion again do we? not your fault when everyone avoids you. Silver medal, 345-5 amateur record. Never been KD. Pretty much Never lost a single round in his entire career. An avoided monster. 20+ KO in row.
                    I really don't care about amateur records. His not as popular, his resume isn't as good. You just want everyone to bow at his feet. As I said, it would be a great year if he beat those two guys. But you want me to pretend he's something he's not. Sorry, not over here, guy.

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by bigjavi973 View Post
                      yes but I was referring to team ggg saying they want the winner cuz they want the belt etc... just to go back on their own word

                      my thing is what happened to winner must fight NEXT or be stripped!?
                      Well they're about to get both.

                      If I had to choose between one or the other in a few months or both within a year, I'd pick both within a year.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP