Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

"Froch doesn't need the money" vs "Khan is ****** to turn down $5 million"

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by kiDynamite92 View Post
    What's the difference between someone like Lucian Bute and someone like Paul McClotskey?
    Oh for crying out loud.

    Comment


    • #32
      The difference is this;

      Khan turned down a career high day in his prime and a chance to become a 2 weight world champion.

      Really is that simple.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by kiDynamite92 View Post
        And those victories are better then Maidana, Alaxander, Algeri, Judah, Malinagi, Kontelyk and Collazo?
        They completely **** on Khan's resume. How is this even a question?

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by kiDynamite92 View Post
          And those victories are better then Maidana, Alaxander, Algeri, Judah, Malinagi, Kontelyk and Collazo?
          Clearly. You've got to be delusional to say otherwise. Khan has a decent resume but it's not great plus he's ducked better fights.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by kiDynamite92 View Post
            And those victories are better then Maidana, Alaxander, Algeri, Judah, Malinagi, Kontelyk and Collazo?
            Kessler win was okay but he hardly beat him convincingly I mean he beat the shot version of Kessler...
            Abraham lol nah man, Murray almost beat him does that not say it all a guy from 160 nearly beat one of the best wins on Carls record.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by soul_survivor View Post
              Khan has beaten more champions then Froch (8 to 7 respectively).
              Well when you consider one of them was a decrepit Marco Antonio Barrera and another was an acient recovering alcoholic Collazo, it doesn't really mean as much.

              You can always tell when a person doesn't have a real argument when they don't list the actual names of the opponents. They use vague phrases like "7 former champions"

              Originally posted by soul_survivor View Post
              Khan was regarded as the number one guy in his division. Froch wasn't.
              No he wasn't.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Red Cyclone View Post
                Kessler win was okay but he hardly beat him convincingly I mean he beat the shot version of Kessler...
                Abraham lol nah man, Murray almost beat him does that not say it all a guy from 160 nearly beat one of the best wins on Carls record.
                He arguably beat Kessler both times. I had Froch winning the first fight.

                He beat a prime Abraham 12 rounds to 0 about five years ago when he was an underdog in the fight. Whereas Murray lost to an old Abraham who hardly even bothers to train or show up to fight these days.

                Shows the difference in levels between a world class fighter like Froch and a **** average fringe level fighter like Murray.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by b00g13man View Post
                  They completely **** on Khan's resume. How is this even a question?
                  Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
                  Clearly. You've got to be delusional to say otherwise. Khan has a decent resume but it's not great plus he's ducked better fights.
                  Gtfoh! Those fighters ****** ass! Why are you giving him credit for fighting an ancient Kessler? shoulf give khan credit for beat MAB then. How many times did Johnson lose before fighting Froch? Taylor was decent. Bute was untested and exposed, groves was good but was getting out boxed till the Ko and Andre Dirrell was a good win.

                  Khan on the other hand has beaten guys like Maidana and Judah who gave Floyd Mayweather hell. P4p is there really anyone on his resume as good as either of them? Cause if they were they would have shown it against ward? Topping that off is victories over Alexander, Algeri and Malinagi. All proven fighters who have competed at the top.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
                    The difference is this;

                    Khan turned down a career high day in his prime and a chance to become a 2 weight world champion.

                    Really is that simple.
                    He didn't turn it down. Brook went out and got stabbed and screwed everything up, also, the chance of brook not turning up is real possibility.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by kiDynamite92 View Post
                      Gtfoh! Those fighters ****** ass! Why are you giving him credit for fighting an ancient Kessler? shoulf give khan credit for beat MAB then. How many times did Johnson lose before fighting Froch? Taylor was decent. Bute was untested and exposed, groves was good but was getting out boxed till the Ko and Andre Dirrell was a good win.

                      Khan on the other hand has beaten guys like Maidana and Judah who gave Floyd Mayweather hell. P4p is there really anyone on his resume as good as either of them? Cause if they were they would have shown it against ward? Topping that off is victories over Alexander, Algeri and Malinagi. All proven fighters who have competed at the top.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP