YOU are the one that looks ******. you cant even read 8 or 10 sentences into the article. Suiliman said "IF the promoters make an agreement" Do you understand what that means? It means its still up to GGG you dumb@ss
Before Cotto-Canelo fight WBC promised that winner MUST FIGHT GGG or will get stripped.
I really hope they will keep promise. GGG waited to long, made step aside.
Correct me if I'm wrong,but didn't canelo have to sign a contract saying that if he beat cotto,he'd have to fight his mandatory next?(golovkin)
No Canelo or Cotto didn't have to sign a contract to fight GGG. WBC just had to make a statement saying winner would have to fight him but neither or obligated, hence stripping of belt if they didn't.
Fine. Canelo can just unbuckle the belt and hand it over to his daddy. Or, he can hand him a big fat check. But he's gonna hand him one or the other.....
and you said Canelo beat the man who beat the man at 160. Thats not really accurate. Actually, he beat the man (at 155) who beat the man (at 159)
Why does Canelo have to hand over the belt, didn't Suliman state he is more then satisfied with a doubleheader? So in the WBC words they are not going to strip Canelo. He brings in more money than Lil G.
So Suliman says he is happy for a doubleheader and you say unbuckle belt or pay a fat check..
I know Suliman is president of WBC but who are you since you clearly have more say so over WBC business then he does.
Comment