Comments Thread For: Miguel Cotto: I Won 8 of 12 Rounds, I Expected To Win

[Santa_]

No! Just stop. You fought valiantly but you only won 4 or 5 rounds.

Cotto needs to watch the replay.

[bigdunny1]

Haven't rescored it yet but that's pretty much what I saw. Cotto piling up points throughout with Canelo landing the more damaging punches; but far fewer.

Look up the punch stats dude. Cotto landed fewer punches then Canelo so how was his punches far fewer?

[A-Wolf]

Look up the punch stats dude. Cotto landed fewer punches then Canelo so how was his punches far fewer?

New to this eh?

[Bardock]

2 rounds??? That I dont agree with... 3 yea I can see that.... goes along with my statement.... closer fight than people actually expected... ima def watch next saturday and we should do a thread and we can all throw in our scores of the fight there

I could see giving Cotto the first round if you want to be biased.

[bigjavi973]

Listen you quoted me first. You saying he only got out landed by 26 punches leaving out the fact that the threw almost 150 more shots then Canelo. When you throw that many more punches you almost ALWAYS land more then your opponent which speaks to just how completely ineffective Cotto was. Then you look at the power punch stats and he only landed 14% of those shots to 40% landed by Canelo. I posted the entire stats to show the big picture which is Cotto did NOTHING well and couldn't crack Canelo's defense and was scared to engage and open up because of Canelo's hard counter punches He won a max of 3 rounds. And those 3 rounds I gave him were still close. He had no decisive rounds. Just rounds where you felt bad for him and said well at least he did better then previous round. lol A judge having it 1 round for Cotto is closer to reality then people thinking Cotto won 8 rounds and should of won the fight.

And the only reason Cotto didn't get KO'd was because he was on his bike all night. The one round he tried to stand his ground he took a massive beating and he ran every round after that.

Did you not read the post this reply was for???

yea it was 150.... again.... HE THREW OVER 100 JABS ALONE!!!!

just stop cuz you're going around in circles beating the same bush.

[bigdunny1]

New to this eh?

New to what? If you watched the fight and said Canelo landed fewer shots you are just R etarded. It aint my opinion he landed more shots it's a fact. Even if your eyes are broken and you can't see what's going on the compubox stats were all one sided for Canelo.

[bigjavi973]

I don't have a problem with that scorecard.

Every potential Cotto round could have been scored the other way.

so 119 is a good scorecard to you.....

[periks19]

so you would say that you would agree with the 119 scorecard that pretty much everyone else was laughing at? (including canelo fans)

You mean the casual boxing fans which were ricans. Cotto won maybe 3 to 4 rounds max and were close rounds. Trying hard and doing well doens't mean you get the round. What that means is that specific judge liked canelos most effective and harder punches than cotto 4 more landed jabs. Its so simple

You ricans are plain delusional like PRBOXINGCOTTO who called JMM a crybaby for saying he beat pac which those fights were really close but when it comes to your boxer cotto when he clearly lost you guys call it a robbery. You guys are pathetic just like cotto.

[A-Wolf]

New to what? If you watched the fight and said Canelo landed fewer shots you are just R etarded. It aint my opinion he landed more shots it's a fact. Even if your eyes are broken and you can't see what's going on the compubox stats were all one sided for Canelo.

lmao... Compubox stats. Idiot.

[icha]

UNLESS of course... He went to a BBQ at Erik Morlales house.

That peasant-beef is said to be... "tainted"

Canelo is a young dude at 25. If anyone can drop 25lbs and spring back...

is that the reason cotto refused VADA testing ???
stop playing the victim and take your loss like a man, javi and some other well known cotto fans already did, why cant you??
just accept the L and move over, nothing wrong with that...