Comments Thread For: Holyfield Tabs Golovkin as The Number One P4P Fighter

[megas30]

so what do you rate higher, a fighter completely dominating EVERYONE within a single division, or a fighter bouncing between several divisions, picking the softest touch in each division along the way?

"Soft touch" is subjective. Traversing weight classes is the physical exemplification of p4p, because we get see what we imagined. Stay in one weight class and dominating shows that you are baddest in that weight class. So, to answer your question and stick to my premise, if you are discussing the p4p, i pick the person moving through weight classes, and this is with regards to mythical p4p. At least, this person is showing me they can fight at a higher weight and beat bigger men.

[Teetotaler]

haha at all the brothas disowning holyfield. I didn't think it was possible for you guys to hate him more for picking and saying he thought pacquiao won.

[texasboi15]

A great champion has spoken that knows more about boxing than most everyone here acting tough behind their computers.

B!tch shut the fck up you sound scorned you little b!tch

As if we're all entitled to agree with Holyfield and not have our own opinions lmaO get the fck outta here you ****** fck

[OnePunch]

"Soft touch" is subjective. Traversing weight classes is the physical exemplification of p4p, because we get see what we imagined. Stay in one weight class and dominating shows that you are baddest in that weight class. So, to answer your question and stick to my premise, if you are discussing the p4p, i pick the person moving through weight classes, and this is with regards to mythical p4p. At least, this person is showing me they can fight at a higher weight and beat bigger men.

take Broner for example. Sure, he won a "title" against a soft touch in Paulie, but against other welters he got beat up by Maidana and outworked by Porter. And at 140 he got a "title" beating a fringe contender who himself was coming off a loss and a year layoff. If he would pick a division and actually beat all the top guys in that division, I would give him alot more credit than his division hopping, because all he is doing is grabbing the low hanging fruit. Other than Demarco at 135, Broner has never beaten a fighter within the top 5 of that division......

[Rip Chudd]

p4p lists are ENTIRELY "what ifs", genius........

yeah maybe you're right. Couldn't possibly have anything to do with skill set, who you've beaten or anything like that. Purely off "What ifs"

[megas30]

You talking about education haha you don't even have common sense, guess its not that common in your house.
I'm European, I've native American in my family history. You hear me playing the victim or just getting on with it.
FFS u that daft u quoted me enough UK should have given u a clue ya fanny. & again with your "you people" victim
I'll play along, which of these African traders were responsible for the industrial revolution in YOUR country?
Answers on a postcard son. You know how to work a pencil don't ya?

Industrial revolution? Normally you guys just talk about inventions. What happened? Are we really talking about the industrial revolution that is responsible for most of the chronic illnesses and diseases in the world? We today might not be able to see ourselves without certain inventions, but i can guarantee you that people were surving and quite happy without them. Did they really make our lives better or just cause new problems? I notice inventions to be a trump card of white supremacists. As i said, go pick up a book, for no one race/ethnicity is responsible for your so-called industrial revolution. There are many players. Inventions are improved, inventions are stolen, or copied. However, there are a certain people who love to take credit for everything, because it makes them feel supreme.

[texasboi15]

A great champion has spoken that knows more about boxing than most everyone here acting tough behind their computers.

This dumb fck wants us to agree with everything punch drunk evander says lmaO

So we should all agree with evander when he says he should still be fighting too right?!

BWaHAhahaahahahaHAhaaHaHAhahahaa!!

[imperial1]

I give Holyfield a pass on this ..in no way shape or form does a guy who has never fought an elite fighter deserve the # 1 spot p4p

[joseph5620]

take Broner for example. Sure, he won a "title" against a soft touch in Paulie, but against other welters he got beat up by Maidana and outworked by Porter. And at 140 he got a "title" beating a fringe contender who himself was coming off a loss and a year layoff. If he would pick a division and actually beat all the top guys in that division, I would give him alot more credit than his division hopping, because all he is doing is grabbing the low hanging fruit. Other than Demarco at 135, Broner has never beaten a fighter within the top 5 of that division......

Nobody is calling Broner number 1 pound for pound. "Genius." Buy carry on with your Captain save a ho campaign for Golovkin.

[OnePunch]

Nobody is calling Broner number 1 pound for pound. "Genius." Buy carry on with your Captain save a ho campaign for Golovkin.

I know that thinking of 2 seperate concepts at the same time is probably beyond your mental capacity, but Megas and myself were having a different conversation about the "clean out division" vs "division hop" strategy. It had nothing to do with p4p discussion.

Isnt there a Floyd thread somewhere you should be in?