Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

If "My body ain't ready for 160" doesn't make weight on November 21...

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Dean_Razorback View Post
    so if he misses the CW vs cotto the belt won't be on the line? even if he is below the MW limit?
    No they are just making stuff up there is no way in hell that could pass

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by LarryXXX View Post
      That is not a rule...lol wtf??? you can vacate a ABC belt all you want,as long as you still fight in the division you keep the Ring title and lineal title can not be lost until you lose or leave the division
      Are you suggesting Canelo would be considered the lineal champ even if he avoided a fight with the number one contender? That's the only reason he'd drop the wbc belt, to avoid that mandatory.

      Comment


      • #33
        What would be the point of a catchweight that you can miss and still fight for the title? There would be no tangible punishment for missing the weight.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by LarryXXX View Post
          Who cares if he drops the WBC??? he would still be Ring/Lineal champion and the biggest name in the division
          And he doesn't want any part of the best fighter in the division.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by LarryXXX View Post
            That is not a rule...lol wtf??? you can vacate a ABC belt all you want,as long as you still fight in the division you keep the Ring title and lineal title can not be lost until you lose or leave the division
            You can't vacate to avoid #1 contender, then fight 1lb above the lower division and remain The Champ gtfo. #1 rule is, you must be a MW to be MW champ. Makes sense?

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by El-blanco View Post
              Are you suggesting Canelo would be considered the lineal champ even if he avoided a fight with the number one contender? That's the only reason he'd drop the wbc belt, to avoid that mandatory.
              Yes i am,there is no rule for the Ring that you have to fight any mandatories nor the lineal title.....

              Dariuz Michalczewski never fought Roy and remained Lineal
              Last edited by Larry the boss; 10-31-2015, 04:54 PM.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by LarryXXX View Post
                Yes i am,there is no rule for the Ring that you have to fight any mandatories nor the lineal title.....

                Dariuz Michalczewski never fought Roy are remained Lineal
                Then it's bogus. Being the real champ means fighting the number one guys. If you're not doing that it's a paper title.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by LHK View Post
                  What would be the point of a catchweight that you can miss and still fight for the title? There would be no tangible punishment for missing the weight.
                  They've probably implemented major financial penalties for missing weight.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by From Russia View Post
                    Will he move up to MW or become a three division champion at 156lbs? Btw, I see Canelo becoming a 6 weight divisions champion(154,155,156,157,158,159) and when he won't be able to make 159, Canelo moves up to 159.1.
                    he was 154.5 on his last fight , dont you worry he will be just fine...

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      What I found strange is the fact that GGG holds belt of a different organisation but the WBC made him their mandatory for their belt. Is that a new thing? Has it ever happen before?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP