so they're bleeding money while generating absolutely no buzz from the casual audience? this shyt aint gonna work, not now not ever.
Waddell+Reed's PBC investment has lost 59% of it's value.
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
The average guy making 50k a year would have work a 100 years to make Berto's career earnings...Comment
-
just like i said fighters are making millions now whether they are under haymon or not.Comment
-
Main difference i, unlike Floyd, none of these guys generate any money.Comment
-
LMFAOOO, can't wait till they go out of bizzzzznesssss
PPL gonna be like, some companies gotta go bankrupt and go out of business to make some money... gawd, don't you know money?Comment
-
Comment
-
I think the main issue for the haters here is the quantity vs quality , they had a really good share of good fights but becuase they air so much boxing they put a ton of **** fights as well , they cant work like HBO/Show with once every few weeks/monthes kind of events due to their startegy of doing a weekly (sometime more then 1) broadcast......
Competiton is ALWAYS better for the consumer and unless you have something personal against PBC you as a boxing fan shouldnt want it to fail , improve sure , but fail no.Comment
-
The problem with PBC is that boxing just isn't that popular.
You may say putting fighters on regular TV might make the sport grow but it takes a long time to get people who don't follow boxing familiar with the fighters and give them something to be interested in, not to mention the fighters might only appear on PBC once every 6 months.
This is just a different era now, there's not enough really famous names to carry the brand.
Most business investments take a long time to recoup money but i just feel they might be flogging a dead horse with this one.
I mean, i personally don't mind PBC, the more boxing there is, the better for me. I'm just a spectator but i think from a business point of view, it's probably a difficult task.Comment
Comment