Tyson Fury Says Porter Beat Brook...and Porters title was taken due to beef with GBP

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Hahaha...

It appears he can actually judge a fight properly then, just not when Khan becomes involved in the situation.

I think this provides a more accurate representation of why Box-Office suddenly did a complete 180 on Brook-Porter

He also slowly changed his mind on this tooo...

I've already admitted Khan is ducking Brook and it is disappointing.

He seems to have moments of weakness where he lets his guard down and tells the truth then suddenly realises that he's Khanturd and has to save face so he goes in the complete opposite direction

Damn Box-Office. This is not a good look. Take the L and maybe log off for a while until people forget.

[Box-Office]

Dirk is a admitted coke head, he tells me he'll stop attacking me, but like a druggie with bad habits he relapses and takes a snort ie slate me. This whole saga stems from this:

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=684155

Notice I didn't post the quote? Cuz I can't, Dirk went back and the first post in the pic, that is how desperate he is.

Before Chaves:

Mate, Hearn said literally hours ago that the Rios fight was looking like the one they were going to make for the summer

This Chaves talk is basically for a warm-up fight in May.

Because Brook has since requested to fight twice this summer. Once in May and then again in July. Diego Chaves would actually be a great fight to get at 1 months notice. They're not going to get anyone spectacular to fight in May. How can you not understand that?

July fight could be Marquez dependent on if he wants to fight again - if his knee is OK. If not, it will probably be Rios.

You do realise that Brook-Chaves would basically be an undercard fight on the Mitchell-Linares show? It's not meant to rise Brook's stock, it's just a keep busy fight

Brook will be headlining another show in the summer. That's the one that will raise his stock.

Your desperation is getting sad.

You do realise that Brook-Chaves would basically be an undercard fight on the Mitchell-Linares show? It's not meant to rise Brook's stock, it's just a keep busy fight

Brook will be headlining another show in the summer. That's the one that will raise his stock.

Your desperation is getting sad.

After Chaves fight was signed:

I agree with you that this will be a tougher fight than Porter. Chaves is much more refined on the inside than Porter who is just sloppy as ****.

This is what it all boils down to.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Box-Office.....take the L mate

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Box-Office be like...



Don't know why you're angry at me. It was Laced Up who completely buried you by digging up that quote.

[LacedUp]

Dirk is a admitted coke head, he tells me he'll stop attacking me, but like a druggie with bad habits he relapses and takes a snort ie slate me. This whole saga stems from this:

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=684155

Notice I didn't post the quote? Cuz I can't, Dirk went back and the first post in the pic, that is how desperate he is.

Before Chaves:














After Chaves fight was signed:











This is what it all boils down to.

Damn. Pure desperation.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Damn. Pure desperation.

I'm still cracking up

[torosboxing75]

I like porter but he clearly lost.

[Box-Office]

I watched the fight again and felt it was closer than I initially thought it was. I mean yeah you can't take none away cuz Brook won a title on hostile territory, but it was close & not a domination as LacedUp says it was. Boo hoo I owned myself. Not sure if Laced Up is even qualified to call on contradictions, how do you go

from this:

Wlad doesn't have a left hook.

To this:

Wlad's finishing left hook looked like something Joe Frazier would be proud of.

[LacedUp]

I watched the fight again and felt it was closer than I initially thought it was. I mean yeah you can't take none away cuz Brook won a title on hostile territory, but it was close & not a domination as LacedUp says it was. Boo hoo I owned myself. Not sure if Laced Up is even qualified to call on contradictions, how do you go

from this:




To this:

Yeah I said he didn't have a left hook - as in he hadn't used it in years when I said it. Just my luck he went out and used it incredibly in his very next fight. I gave him probs.

I'm not too chicken to admit when I'm wrong, and I would never do what you did simply because you can't let your love for Khan go and say Brook actually performed well. Which he obviously did

[Box-Office]

Yeah I said he didn't have a left hook - as in he hadn't used it in years when I said it. Just my luck he went out and used it incredibly in his very next fight. I gave him probs.

I'm not too chicken to admit when I'm wrong, and I would never do what you did simply because you can't let your love for Khan go and say Brook actually performed well. Which he obviously did

You just have obsession issues, it was Freedom, Elroy and now me. Go suck off Hearn on Twitter for a retweet. I can't be that important.