Tyson Fury Says Porter Beat Brook...and Porters title was taken due to beef with GBP
Collapse
-
-
Why have you suddenly turned so drastically on Brook, Frankie?
You used to have his picture in your avatar a few months ago.
I what you're going to reply with - I turned on Khan. Yes I did but I had legitimate reasons. He ducked a huge fight with Brook which everyone wanted to see and would have earned him a lot of money. He has turned into a complete puussy over the past couple of years.
What is your reasoning for turning on Brook? So much so that you now accuse him of being gay, on steroids, losing to Porter etc etc. Even I haven't taken my criticism of Khan as far as to blindly accuse him of being on roids. What's with that?
You have a history of this. You used to hate James DeGale too then you suddenly act as if you're his biggest fan recently. You also used to be a big Froch supporter now you call him a ducker?
Are you genuinely bi-polar or schizophrenic because you know I've always had my su****ions?Comment
-
Comment
-
Not sure how many times you've watched it but it could have easily beem a draw. Porter's work rate made virtually every round nip and tuck. I've watched it three times and it's been a draw twice. Nothing clear about it except your fanboyism. P.S this has nothing to do with Khan, I like Kell, just not over Khan.
Brook caught Porter with an uppercut in the 7th or 8th and Porter really had nothing after that. He probably didn't win a single round beyond the 7th round.
Jake Donovan who's an editor on this forum, and a man's opinion everyone should really respect (he rarely gets predictions wrong, ever) had it 117-111. And I don't think that's too wide. 116-112 probably could also go, but Porter did not win more than 4 rounds in the fight. And even those 4 rounds were cagey opening rounds mostly where Brook was feeling him out.
He had no gas in the tank after 6.Comment
-
-
Comment
Comment