Comments Thread For: GGG's Promoter: Canelo Faces Anyone, Cotto is Selective

[M Bison]

This is an oxymoron, stop posting; just admit you are a fanboy. You say Cotto resume cant be compared to greats from the past and GGGs resume doesn't compare to Cotto's.

GGG resume is better, he is known for dominating people whereas Cotto resume tells us the story that he gets beat up by above average guys like Clottey, Margarito and Trout and when he steps up to elite Pacquiao/Floyd he gets took to school.
What's to get mad at?

So by your logic Golovkin has a better resume than Pacquiao as well right since you don't rate by names LmFAO you fckin clown!

What about moving up in weight class you idiot shouldn't that be taken into consideration when ranking resume you fcking ******?!

Not really comparable situations, Pacquiao has stepped up and won big fights whereas Cotto has never done that so why compare those situations?

I know it hurts you that I think Cotto resume is somewhat overrated and it pretends to be something it isn't.

[TheBloodGod]

Cotto has lost to B-class fighters (by being beaten up and by being outboxed), and no matter what anyone thinks of Gennady's resume, he's destroyed every B-class fighter he's faced.
No wars, no close decisions, no decisions period.

And comparing their resumes isn't really fair when you consider the advantages Cotto had coming up. Biggest promoter in boxing, built-in ethnic fanbase, etc.

At the end of the day, no matter what age or weight class, Gennady is better, p4p.
Deal with it, bítch.



-----------------------------

"he's destroyed every B-class fighter he's faced.."

BWaHAhahahaaahahaHAhahahahahahaa!!!

What about A-class fighters you dumb fck lmaO?!

Let's not talk how good Golovkin's resume is until he faces some A-class competition you fcking clown.

[TheBloodGod]

Yes his resume exceeds the standard doesn't it, losing all those fights that and the fact he likely should have one or two more losses in that 'resume'
You do know the definition of resume don't you?
I don't rate resume by names on the list and neither should many it should be who you've beat and quite simply Cotto hasn't beat many good opponents.

"I don't rate resume by names on the list and neither should many it should be who you've beat...WTF?!"

Do you hear how fcking ******ed that sht sounds you fckin moron lmaO does that make any sense you dumb fck?!

Fckin hilarious.

[M Bison]

"I don't rate resume by names on the list and neither should many it should be who you've beat...WTF?!"

Do you hear how fcking ******ed that sht sounds you fckin moron lmaO does that make any sense you dumb fck?!

Fckin hilarious.

So you think we should look at guys like Gatti and rate his resume good because he has fought some elite level opponents but completely ignoring the fact that he lost all of those elite fights?

A resume is more than just about who you fought, its about getting the W and quite simply Cotto doesn't have any over the main legit guys he fought for his 147 division whereas GGG is well on the way to adding the winner of Canelo Vs Cotto to his list then probably going to fight two more fights after that with either Lee/Saunders or Quillin/Jacobs these are all guys who would beat Cotto.

[Contra]

"he's destroyed every B-class fighter he's faced.."

BWaHAhahahaaahahaHAhahahahahahaa!!!

What about A-class fighters you dumb fck lmaO?!

Let's not talk how good Golovkin's resume is until he faces some A-class competition you fcking clown.

What A-class fighters has Cotto beat?

And no, shot Martinez was no longer A-class.

So.... lets have it. Who?

I'll give him one: Mosley. Who else?



---------------------

[TheBloodGod]

So you think we should look at guys like Gatti and rate his resume good because he has fought some elite level opponents but completely ignoring the fact that he lost all of those elite fights?

A resume is more than just about who you fought, its about getting the W and quite simply Cotto doesn't have any over the main legit guys he fought for his 147 division whereas GGG is well on the way to adding the winner of Canelo Vs Cotto to his list then probably going to fight two more fights after that with either Lee/Saunders or Quillin/Jacobs these are all guys whoever would beat Cotto.

"..Cotto doesn't have any (wins) over the main legit guys he fought for his 147 division whereas GGG is well on the way to adding the winner of Canelo Vs COTTO to his list..?!"

BwaHAhahahahahahaaHAhahahahahahah!!

You fckin ******.

[M Bison]

"..Cotto doesn't have any (wins) over the main legit guys he fought for his 147 division whereas GGG is well on the way to adding the winner of Canelo Vs COTTO to his list..?!"

BwaHAhahahahahahaaHAhahahahahahah!!

You fckin ******.

One of them is holding hostage the WBC super belt so it is a necessary scalp for GGG, see If Cotto was a man and he would fight GGG If he wins I'd actually not have a problem with him winning the problem is he will make excuses and no doubt vacate the belt after holding it hostage from the real guys who wanted to fight for it.

[JRB123]

Canelo has no problem but he is Oscar's last resort so that fight won't happen any time soon

[AnimalisticMeth]

Cotto is selective? Well lets see who cotto has faced and when

Mayweather #1 P4P fighter at the time
Pacquiao #1 P4P fighter at the time
Mosley # Top 5 Welterweight at the time and top 10 P4P
Martinez # #1 and lineal Champion at 160 and ranked #5 P4P
Canelo #1 Ranked Jr Midleweight
Judah # Top 10 welterweight at the time
Margarito #Top 5 Welterweight at the time and most avoided
Clottey #IBF champion at the time and Top 5 Welterweight
Quintana # Undefeated Top 10 ranked Welterweight
Malignaggi # Undefeated top 10 ranked Jr Welterweight
Geale #Top 5 ranked Midleweight


I ccold go on and on.

[TheBloodGod]

What A-class fighters has Cotto beat?

And no, shot Martinez was no longer A-class.

So.... lets have it. Who?

I'll give him one: Mosley. Who else?



---------------------

What A-class fighter has Golovkin even fought?!

I refuse to talk or compare resume until he faces A-class competition you idiot fck.

To do otherwise is just fcking ******ed.