Comments Thread For: GGG's Promoter: Canelo Faces Anyone, Cotto is Selective

[Fantasiabruja]

Oh yeah the fans were begging for Trout Vs Cotto
You get beat by those type of opponents and you're trying to tell me Cotto has a better resume than GGG, get the fuq outta here!
Cotto is an overrated side-show who is going to get exposed by Canelo, he doesn't give THE FANS what they want, he is doing it for his own gain why else would he demand the huge lionshare of profit against Canelo when Canelo is the draw and Canelo has better wins and has been more relevant than Cotto who's best accolades are fighting leftovers and beating a one knee old man.

I'm going to assume your new to the sport, Cotto's resume as of right now is 100x's better than GGG'S. And as a matter a fact as good as GGG has looked his pro resume is non existing, who has he fought?

[M Bison]

I'm going to assume your new to the sport, Cotto's resume as of right now is 100x's better than GGG'S. And as a matter a fact as good as GGG has looked his pro resume is non existing, who has he fought?

Yes his resume exceeds the standard doesn't it, losing all those fights that and the fact he likely should have one or two more losses in that 'resume'
You do know the definition of resume don't you?
I don't rate resume by names on the list and neither should many it should be who you've beat and quite simply Cotto hasn't beat many good opponents.

[Fantasiabruja]

Yes his resume exceeds the standard doesn't it, losing all those fights that and the fact he likely should have one or two more losses in that 'resume'
You do know the definition of resume don't you?
I don't rate resume by names on the list and neither should many it should be who you've beat and quite simply Cotto hasn't beat many good opponents.

Every fight counts on a boxing resume buddy, win loose or draw. It matters how a fight was won or lost, it matters whether you took chances or not whether you fought cautiously or battled like warrior. Whether you padded your fight record fighting cab drivers or real ranked fighters. If none of this mattered then why is the Tito fight the most memorable fight on Oscars illustrious career? Because he chose to run in the last few rounds of a fight he easily won. Why is it that most people only remember Mayweather for being a boring fighter? Even though he beat everyone he fought. Why is Ali the greatest because of all of his great battles all including the ones he lost. And last but not least why do most people remember seeing Paquiao layed out by Marquez and not as much all the other great wins he had against the likes of Cotto, Margarito and Mosley to name a few. Good boxing resumes include lost fights, Ali lost fights, Tyson, Duran, Leonard, Hagler, Hearns, Chaves sr all lost fights.

[M Bison]

Every fight counts on a boxing resume buddy, win loose or draw. It matters how a fight was won or lost, it matters whether you took chances or not whether you fought cautiously or battled like warrior. Whether you padded your fight record fighting cab drivers or real ranked fighters. If none of this mattered then why is the Tito fight the most memorable fight on Oscars illustrious career? Because he chose to run in the last few rounds of a fight he easily won. Why is it that most people only remember Mayweather for being a boring fighter? Even though he beat everyone he fought. Why is Ali the greatest because of all of his great battles all including the ones he lost. And last but not least why do most people remember seeing Paquiao layed out by Marquez and not as much all the other great wins he had against the likes of Cotto, Margarito and Mosley to name a few. Good boxing resumes include lost fights, Ali lost fights, Tyson, Duran, Leonard, Hagler, Hearns, Chaves sr all lost fights.

Ali, Duran, Hagler, Chavez Sr, Leonard and so on all those guys don't belong in the same breath as Cotto, they fought everyone for the most part and they had their wins through it.

A resume is a summary of what you've done, I'm not saying you need to maintain an 0 to have a great resume but losing to Margarito, Clottey, Trout certainly hurts the resume a little bit but what hurts it more so is that every big fight he has had he pretty much has lost.

He has some good wins (not as many as some make out) on that record but does he belong in the same breath as the ATG's... I know he doesn't.

[Basco]

Yes Cotto is selective, apparently he selects the best opposition win or lose:

Mayweather
Pacquiao
Mosley
Margarito
Clottey
Canelo

And still, people doubt he will fight GGG. The guy knows how to take a beating, I don't think he will be scared of another one.

[Fantasiabruja]

Ali, Duran, Hagler, Chavez Sr, Leonard and so on all those guys don't belong in the same breath as Cotto, they fought everyone for the most part and they had their wins through it.

A resume is a summary of what you've done, I'm not saying you need to maintain an 0 to have a great resume but losing to Margarito, Clottey, Trout certainly hurts the resume a little bit but what hurts it more so is that every big fight he has had he pretty much has lost.

He has some good wins (not as many as some make out) on that record but does he belong in the same breath as the ATG's... I know he doesn't.

In terms of generations yes he can be spoken of in the same breath of those greats, because like it or not he is one of the greats of his generation he is a future HOF'er. When people speak of Mayweather and Pacquiao in the future for better or for worse he will also be mentioned he has already cemented his legacy. GGG still has the chance to turn out to be a dud, thats a fact.

[TheBloodGod]

Yes his resume exceeds the standard doesn't it, losing all those fights that and the fact he likely should have one or two more losses in that 'resume'
You do know the definition of resume don't you?
I don't rate resume by names on the list and neither should many it should be who you've beat and quite simply Cotto hasn't beat many good opponents.

LmFAO you sound fckin ******ed you fckin clown!

So by your logic Golovkin has beat "many good opponents" and Cotto hasn't lmaO?!

Fckin hilarious you fckin lame.

[Contra]

LmFAO you sound fckin ******ed you fckin clown!

So by your logic Golovkin has beat "many good opponents" and Cotto hasn't lmaO?!

Fckin hilarious you fckin lame.

Cotto has lost to B-class fighters (by being beaten up and by being outboxed), and no matter what anyone thinks of Gennady's resume, he's destroyed every B-class fighter he's faced.
No wars, no close decisions, no decisions period.

And comparing their resumes isn't really fair when you consider the advantages Cotto had coming up. Biggest promoter in boxing, built-in ethnic fanbase, etc.

At the end of the day, no matter what age or weight class, Gennady is better, p4p.
Deal with it, bítch.



-----------------------------

[TheBloodGod]

Yes his resume exceeds the standard doesn't it, losing all those fights that and the fact he likely should have one or two more losses in that 'resume'
You do know the definition of resume don't you?
I don't rate resume by names on the list and neither should many it should be who you've beat and quite simply Cotto hasn't beat many good opponents.

So by your logic Golovkin has a better resume than Pacquiao as well right since you don't rate by names LmFAO you fckin clown!

What about moving up in weight class you idiot shouldn't that be taken into consideration when ranking resume you fcking ******?!

[sirron000]

Yes his resume exceeds the standard doesn't it, losing all those fights that and the fact he likely should have one or two more losses in that 'resume'
You do know the definition of resume don't you?
I don't rate resume by names on the list and neither should many it should be who you've beat and quite simply Cotto hasn't beat many good opponents.

This is an oxymoron, stop posting; just admit you are a fanboy. You say Cotto resume cant be compared to greats from the past and GGGs resume doesn't compare to Cotto's.