Abel Sanchez - "Andre Ward's a liar"
Collapse
-
shhhh, the GGG hate squad/Ward apologists dont like facts, and will recoil at the presence of them.Listen guy,
- Negotiations for Golovkin/Lemieux commenced the Monday after Lemeiux/N'Dam - which took place the same day as Ward/Smith
- Golovkin was already mandatory for the WBC title held by Cotto who was in negotiations to fight Alvarez.
Those two items were public knowledge and widely reported. No fighter is going to commit to a fight with Ward in 2016 when they're expecting to be on call for the winner of Cotto/Alvarez in 2016. Ward knew they'd turn it down, especially at a 50/50 purse cut...
If Andre Ward seriously wanted to fight Golovkin, he would've pushed for the fight in March 2015, because in October 2014 he sent the email to read on HBO after Golovkin/Rubio - "Anyplace, anytime, anywhere". How come 5 months after Ward said that, he suddenly needed to take so many tune-ups?
"but but but 164 doe"Comment
- Negotiations for Golovkin/Lemieux commenced the Monday after Lemeiux/N'Dam - which took place the same day as Ward/Smith
-
If you think you're being offered a garbage deal, then you try to negotiate a better one.
That's if you want the fight though which Team GGG absolutely do not.
Maybe 2017. MAYBE....Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
well OF COURSE they didnt want the fight at this time. EVERYONE agrees on that point.
But PLEASE explain to me how with one 160 unification already signed, and being the mando for yet another, why on earth would a fight at 168, which wouldnt even happen for close to a year, at a 50-50 split with a weaker economic draw, be of ANY interest whatsoever? Why would it even be worth discussing? (and this is probably a fools errand, but at least TRY to be objective)Comment
-
Comment
-
What is GGG going to do after unifying? Hang around to fight Andy Lee or Eubank Jr?well OF COURSE they didnt want the fight at this time. EVERYONE agrees on that point.
But PLEASE explain to me how with one 160 unification already signed, and being the mando for yet another, why on earth would a fight at 168, which wouldnt even happen for close to a year, at a 50-50 split with a weaker economic draw, be of ANY interest whatsoever? Why would it even be worth discussing? (and this is probably a fools errand, but at least TRY to be objective)
The Ward fight would be the best out there and the one the fans would want to see next.Comment
-
Propaganda ministers translating what Loeffler really meant now
I don't see what saying "maybe in the future" has to do with respect. If anything that's disrespectful and laughable.Comment
Comment