Tommy hearns vs floyd mayweather. Who wins
Collapse
-
-
No, but if you also add height reach and speed. Hearns is all wrong for Floyd. Hearns is 6'1 and also physically stronger than Floyd. Floyd ain't winning this fight.Comment
-
True. Castillo was past it by then. Actually, given how many times Mayweather fought guys who were past it, I don't he holds up well against a lot of fighters in their primes. The fight with Hearns would never happen. Hearns would sign to fight him without a second thought, but "Money" wouldn't see enough advantages for him to take the huge risk that comes with facing the legendary "Hitman."Comment
-
-
Their is no sarcasm! Floyd's reflexes allow him to melt, shapelessly, between his opponent's movements. Slips, counters, small movements, between every single thing they do. The only fighter in history that he cant do that against(or so I thought) was Pac and Aaron Pryor! Pac is fast af, volume punching, awkward, angles, footwork etc. Floyd even made him look flatfooted and clumsey.
Floyd would have a field day with someone like SRL, and Hearns being tall, is not enough! Floyd tares tall fighters up to shreds.
In fact, if Hearns was just as fast as Pac, had better footwork, output, angles, I have zero doubt that Floyd would change up his entire style and do him dirty! Floyd has shown in 49 fights, that everyone he faces will all look the same.
Clumsey, flatooted, their output will drop etc! He does it to everyone!Comment
-
Comment
-
Did you actually watch the Benitez fight? That was hardly a great performance. And Duran was already past his prime.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment