Why did Manny oppose to WADA back in 2010 vs Floyd?

[Lester Tutor]

Have the detractors even read the main post of this thread? :P

In boxing we call that "ducking."

[radioraheem]

They state that by the afternoon of October 19th they reported the failed A and B samples. This time frame is intentionally vague because it can fall both inside and outside of the news reports of the failed A and B samples.

You dont know who leaked it to the press.

USADA leaked it to the press originally. The press reported it as coming from USADA. So again, USADA told you.

Also, your time frame is also incorrect.

USADA also immediately advised the NYSAC of the preliminary A sample results for the October 10 and October 16 samples on October 19, 2012, and the B sample results for the October 3 sample on the evening of October 18, 2012, or early the following morning.

[GTTofAK]

USADA leaked it to the press originally. The press reported it as coming from USADA. So again, USADA told you.

We know that leaks were coming from within USADA. This does not mean approved by USADA.

[GTTofAK]

Again, no one knows which side approached who to even settle the case. None knows whether it was Team Pacquiao that approached Team Mayweather, or vice-versa. All we have is hearsay.

That is not hearsay you dip****! Hear say is quite simple. Its testimony from on person that they heard another person say something.

I heard him say "Hearsay".

Now legally hearsay is perfectly acceptable evidence. It simply cannot be introduced first. If someone testifies to you 'I heard him say'. Than you have to ask the person did you say X. The moment they deny it the hearsay evidence is perfectly admissible evidence.

****** people watch legal dramas and hear terms they dont understand.

[radioraheem]

That is not hearsay you dip****! Hear say is quit simply. Its testimony from on person that they heard another person say something.

I heard him say "Hearsay".

Now legally hearsay is perfectly acceptable evidence. It simply cannot be introduced first. If someone testifies to you 'I heard him say'. Than you have to ask the person did you say X. The moment they deny it the hearsay evidence is perfectly admissible evidence.

Now show us this evidence that proves details of the settlement for a fact. That mentions the sources specifically. Can you do that? Nope. But please continue with your futile arguments that continually prove nothing.

[GTTofAK]

Now show us this evidence that proves details of the settlement for a fact. That mentions the sources specifically. Can you do that? Nope. But please continue with your futile arguments that continually prove nothing.

Translation didn't know the meaning of hearsay and was throwing around legal words.

[radioraheem]

Translation didn't know the meaning of hearsay and was throwing around legal words.

Translation you cannot even prove anything for a fact, and thereby failed to move the subject.

[Lester Tutor]

Floyd created the concept of the IV system May 1st to the sporting world because he knew that Top Rank would be notified about it, per their contract agreements, so he went ahead with it and decided that 100, 200, 30, 500, 600ml, 1ml, what difference would it make most people believe what they want, so he went ahead with the normal amount of 750ml for a dehydrated athlete. Keep in mind a 15 year weighing 50kg requires 2000ml per 4hr period.

I mean clearly WADA are idiots if they make exceptions from their own code, when they also explain the risks of a blood clot or any injury to the athlete, as in "please be cautious and see out guidelines."

But lets just cherry pick what we want because that's the capacity for most people's objectivity.

Floyd could've taken 20mg of whatever, non illegal substance, and behold everybody would have a theory as the same weight as 10,000ml

Easy work!

[tangalog2200]

''That much info?'' I'm analyzing 3 different occassions or rather interviews regarding Pac's loss to Morales and the reason why, as I said, Brian Kenny's question posed to Pac why he didn't want WADA style testing.

There's nothing to get bent out of shape about that. At least some people are brave enough to answer the question, ''Why didn't Manny Pacquiao want WADA style testing for the initial Floyd bout?'' Can you answer that? It's my article?

''Why didn't Manny Pacquiao want WADA style testing for the initial Floyd bout?''

you might as well apply the same as:

Why did Floyd only want USADA to do the testing for the Pac bout? And for all Floyd's fights?

and why did floyd opted to do out of court settlement when pac's lawyer demanded for floyd's test results? with a confidentiality clause at that...

[Lester Tutor]

''Why didn't Manny Pacquiao want WADA style testing for the initial Floyd bout?''

you might as well apply the same as:

Why did Floyd only want USADA to do the testing for the Pac bout? And for all Floyd's fights?

and why did floyd opted to do out of court settlement when pac's lawyer demanded for floyd's test results? with a confidentiality clause at that...

This thread isn't about Floyd. It just proves the cowardice that not one person has answered why Pacquiao did not want WADA in 2010.

I did all the ground work in laying out a consice article, not one person has attempted to refute it.

Cowards do that. -Rocky