Wilder's resume, seen in a fair light
Collapse
-
-
Liakhovich was indeed shot when Wilder fought him. That's the first honest comment I've ever seen you make.
Arreola was also shot when Stiverne beat him twice, and those were the best wins on Stiverne's record. He was one of the poorest world HW champs ever.
Wilder's resume is diabolical, and you are one of the most blatent trolls on Bscene, which is saying a lot.Comment
-
-
Why does Golovkins skin bother you so much?Comment
-
You missed some,
Ouma(also former IBF champ)
Proksa
Stevens
And now #3 and IBF champ LemiuxComment
-
Why are even comparing DW's resume to a guy in a smaller division? Wilder can only be compared to other heavies and in that respect he has the third best resume behind Wlad and Povetkin. It's like you you guys penAlize him for not losing 50 lbs to fight at MWComment
-
Skin color doesn't dominate my life. If you're a brave fighter that has a great resume, I give just due. Klitschko, Kovalev, Ward, Mayweather, Cotto, Canelo all get their respect from me for fighting the best. Golovkin refuses to fight the best. He is a money grubbing coward. I hate those types of fighters.Comment
-
Golovkin is actively trying to unify his division, fighting Lemieux next and pushing for his mandatory shot at the WBC and lineal titles after that.Skin color doesn't dominate my life. If you're a brave fighter that has a great resume, I give just due. Klitschko, Kovalev, Ward, Mayweather, Cotto, Canelo all get their respect from me for fighting the best. Golovkin refuses to fight the best. He is a money grubbing coward. I hate those types of fighters.
Wilder could have unified his division already, with one fight, against Wlad, who would have fought him in a heartbeat.
He could still give us a unified HW division simply by offering to fight the winner of Wlad/Fury. No need to worry about Povetkin if he did that.
But we all know he won't do it, so stfu with this "brave fighter ... great resume ... " bullshit.Comment
-
Munroe Jr is better than all three of them stylistically and he offers more of a game fight plus I'm pretty sure he has a better chin than all three of them combined.Let's take a fair and objective look at Wilder's resume. It is certainly not great at all, but to be honest, it's not exactly horrible. I consider his resume to be on par with Golovkin's. Let's take a look at his top 3 wins.
1 - Bermane Stiverne:
Stiverne was the hardhitting WBC champion who had only 1 loss, a freak accident against journeyman Demetrice King. Besides that, Stiverne had taken the zero of Kertson Manswell (20 wins, 15 KOs) and had twice defeated Chris Arreola, who had beat guys like Seth Mitchell and Tomasz Adamek (got robbed, though). This was a respectable win and only haters would deny that. This is a better win than any win on Golovkin's record.
2 - Malik Scott:
He got robbed against Vyacheslav Glazkov. He was winning against Chisora until the referee controversially decided to stop it. He beat Alex Leapai. Technically, Malik is now a guy with a 38-1-0 record who has proven to be an okay boxer, even though he is not great at all. Not bad for Wilder to crush him in 1 round. This is a win on par with the ones Golovkin has been getting for years.
3 - Kelvin Price:
Price was undefeated in 13 fights and had taken Tor Hamer's zero. That, and Kelvin is very big. Not bad for Wilder to crush him in 3 rounds. In no way a special win, but it's kinda okay.
When Wilder beats Johan Duhaupass, who has just defeated Manuel Charr, he will have gotten yet another win in the same league as the typical Golovkin win.Comment
Comment