Comments Thread For: Kell Brook Vows To Break Mayweather's 49-0 Record

[LacedUp]

Stop it right there Kell..

Don't have too much ambition. I think you should tell us that you'd like to take a couple of losses and not make that much money.

People on this forum They didn't even read it. He's paying homage to Floyd ffs.

[ELPacman]

Easily Kell Brook. Beat faded, over the hill, past prime fighters. Oh throw in some IV fluids, own the town that you fight in, and make sure all is in favor of... YOU.

[Box-Office]

He would have a world title but nobody would know him on a boxing website?

Are you having another one of your ******ed turns?

There was hardly any "mayweather showdown" talks being had, it was all about the Khan fight.

How many people know/care about Terry Flanagan? Brook has used Khan's name to become a name himself. You remember some kid Jan Zavcek? He too held the same belt as Kell at WW, but how many people gave a fak?

[Box-Office]

Stop it right there Kell..

Don't have too much ambition. I think you should tell us that you'd like to take a couple of losses and not make that much money.

People on this forum They didn't even read it. He's paying homage to Floyd ffs.

This surely doesn't count as delusion.

[LacedUp]

How many people know/care about Terry Flanagan? Brook has used Khan's name to become a name himself. You remember some kid Jan Zavcek? He too held the same belt as Kell at WW, but how many people gave a fak?

Keep telling yourself that

deluded.

I guess khan's name got him in the top 10 P4P. Khan's never even been on the P4P list.

[Box-Office]

Keep telling yourself that

deluded.

I guess khan's name got him in the top 10 P4P. Khan's never even been on the P4P list.

Canelo's last 5: Kirkland, Lara, Angulo, Mayweather & Trout

Brook's last 5: Gavin, Dan, Porter, Robles & Senchenko

They have Brook, but not Canelo yet you keep spouting the same rankings trash you hide behind you mug.

Ring has Kell #1 at WW over Bradley???

[LacedUp]

Canelo's last 5: Kirkland, Lara, Angulo, Mayweather & Trout

Brook's last 5: Gavin, Dan, Porter, Robles & Senchenko

They have Brook, but not Canelo yet you keep spouting the same rankings trash you hide behind you mug.

Ring has Kell #1 at WW over Bradley???

Did I say he deserved it?

Thank Amir Khan for Brook's P4P rankings

What rankings trash? Are you sure you know where you want to go with this? You seem very confused.

Is your vagina hurting from Brook being ranked over Khan in every possible ranking?

[wlliam]

49 and 0 for a non heavyweight is a made up record.
Ricardo Lopez 51 and 0
Julio Cesar Chavez 89 and 0.
Roman Gonzalez is 43 and 0. He should surpass the 49 and 0 mark next year.
Promoters make up records to sell fights.
Do marketers think the public is ******?

The record is retiring with PERFECT 49-0 record. Marciano had 49 fightd, won em all, Mayweather had 49 fights won em all...Lopez has 52 fights, won 51 of them..Chavez didnt retire undefeated...Roman Gonzales is almsot thrre, if he loses or has a draw...the 49-0 record still stands. What so hard to understand about that? Its about winning EVERY fight and retiring as a Champ. Its about having a perfect record.

[wlliam]

Is that true about Brook being P4P#10??? So Brooks 1 decent win over Porter makes him the 10th best fighter in the world?? I dont doubt the Ring placed Brooks name in that slot but thats some garbage @$$ back room dealing BS. I also dont doubt he has the physical skills to be p4p but he just COMPLETELY lacks the top level opposition that seprrates him from the rest of thesport, the level of opposition is a HUGE part of ranking the p4P best. I guess when you take into account that almost the entire sport, in every division, NOBODY is fighting each othrr...thats only logical reason anybody would put Brook #10..its actually sad the state the sport is in.

With Floyd dropping out of the rankings that would shake upthe entire top 10, its not as simple as-move everybody up 1...in the sense that nobody is fighting each other in every division, Klitschko should and can very well be the new p4p #1. Look at Ward for instance, everybody has/had him #2 but he hasnt fought nobody in how long? Klitz has fought consistently better opp than the entire sport collectively...I would still have Pac but he would be somewhere between 6-10.

I dont necessarily dispute Brook being the #1 WW but he hasnt fought the best WWs that put him above Bradley or Pac. Khan shouldnt even be rated at WW, if Brook wins this next one his credentials completely shtt on Khans 147 crefentials. Fk Khan

[Box-Office]

Did I say he deserved it?

Thank Amir Khan for Brook's P4P rankings

What rankings trash? Are you sure you know where you want to go with this? You seem very confused.

Is your vagina hurting from Brook being ranked over Khan in every possible ranking?

No, but you just took a shot at Khan never been on the list and I poked holes in your argument explaining how Khan isn't exactly missing out.