Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mayweather's IV injection (Master thread)

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
    Can we really say that for sure? 100% sure of that? Lance Armstrong got caught years later.

    Who knows, one day, Ellerbe or Alex Ariza or Memo Heredia or someone else might spill the beans .... that is what happened to Lance. Can easily happen to Floyd.

    but in my books, Floyd is guilty. You cannot be using an IV if you weighed in at relatively the same weight as 1, 2, 4 weeks earlier and all of a sudden say after the weigh in, I need an IV before giving the DCO complete urine sample. Out in the open like that?

    Diego Corrales came in 2lbs overweight at the weigh in.
    Floyd fans said he was OK (not severely dehydrated) because the next fight he was able to make weight. While that is BS logic, so did Floyd against Berto!

    Your book doesn't matter..

    Nothing is ever certain. But this, isn't really an issue, like the false flag gulf of Tonkin incident that never happened. Freddy Roach said it was not a big deal. He had no issues with it.

    Remember, big Bob Arum sued Floyd for less... And won!!

    Now, would Bob crucify Floyd if there was an actual actionable issue(lawsuit worthy) ???

    Yes he would. Bob would sue, quickly.. Why can't people understand simple things..

    Bob would sue Floyd if he could... He did before..

    Your points of view are moot... Bob being a lawyer would have had them adjudicated by this point..

    If you gotta look up adjudicated... Talk to someone else
    Last edited by Zaroku; 03-18-2016, 12:57 AM.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Zaroku View Post
      Nothing is ever certain. But this, isn't really an issue, like the false flag gulf of Tonkin incident that never happened. Freddy Roach said it was not a big deal. He had no issues with it.

      Remember, big Bob Arum sued Floyd for less... And won!!

      Now, would Bob crucify Floyd if there was an actual actionable issue(lawsuit worthy) ???

      Yes he would. Bob would sue, quickly.. Why can't people understand simple things..

      Bob would sue Floyd if he could... He did before..

      Your points of view are moot... Bob being a lawyer would have had them adjudicated by this point..

      If you gotta look up adjudicated... Talk to someone else

      No way Bob would sue.

      Bob, Manny, Roach wanted a rematch with Floyd. Lots of money was in play. Manny's injury kinda killed that but its still possible that Floyd comes back to try for number 50.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
        No way Bob would sue.

        Bob, Manny, Roach wanted a rematch with Floyd. Lots of money was in play. Manny's injury kinda killed that but its still possible that Floyd comes back to try for number 50.
        Bad logic!!

        Bob & manny already sued Floyd. Yet still after losing the law suit got the first fight!
        Inspite of being sued, and losing, and paying a large amount of money...
        Floyd made the fight.

        Think before you reply.

        Floyd was sued by Manny for character defamation, yet later on, Floyd wanted the fight so it happened... Agreed?? This is kinda universally accepted!!

        So suddenly pAC& Co were worried about killing a rematch???

        Hahahahahahaha
        This is silly
        Last edited by Zaroku; 03-18-2016, 01:18 AM.

        Comment


        • NAC 467.558 The****utic use exemptions must be approved by the Commission (NRS 467.030)
          1.
          All applications for a the****utic use exemption must be submitted and approved by the Commission at least 7 days in advance of any contest if practicable or immediately upon prescribed need before the contest.

          Isn't it that Nsac was advices 3 weeks after the contest?

          No where near 7 days in advance of a contest?

          - RED FLAG

          Last edited by Spoon23; 03-18-2016, 01:49 AM.

          Comment


          • NAC 467.528 Physical examination required at weigh-in. (NRS 467.030)


            BELOW IS A HINT OF WHEN FLOYD USED HIS IV!!!
            ************************************************** ********

            2.
            An unarmed combatant must report to the Commission or Executive Director any infusions, medical treatment, outpatient treatment, or hospital admission that takes place after the weigh-in and prior to the contest.


            So any infusion must be reported to the commission after the weigh-in..

            So does that mean 3 weeks after the weigh-in will suffice? Or isn't that too late already? Shouldn't it be before the boxing match ever takes place. I believe that's what it meant. Not 3 weeks after.


            -RED FLAG

            Last edited by Spoon23; 03-18-2016, 01:49 AM.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Spoon23 View Post
              NAC 467.528 Physical examination required at weigh-in. (NRS 467.030)


              BELOW IS A HINT OF WHEN FLOYD USED HIS IV!!!
              ************************************************** ********

              2.
              An unarmed combatant must report to the Commission or Executive Director any infusions, medical treatment, outpatient treatment, or hospital admission that takes place after the weigh-in and prior to the contest.


              So any infusion must be reported to the commission after the weigh-in..

              So does that mean 3 weeks after the weigh-in will suffice? Or isn't that too late already? Shouldn't it be before the boxing match ever takes place. I believe that's what it meant. Not 3 weeks after.

              -RED FLAG

              Yet.. YET nothing happened. It is over. Let's talk about doctors never doing UN needed surgeries!!! Come on!!

              Dude get real!

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Spoon23 View Post
                NAC 467.558 The****utic use exemptions must be approved by the Commission (NRS 467.030)
                1.
                All applications for a the****utic use exemption must be submitted and approved by the Commission at least 7 days in advance of any contest if practicable or immediately upon prescribed need before the contest.

                Isn't it that Nsac was advices 3 weeks after the contest?

                No where near 7 days in advance of a contest?

                - RED FLAG
                Yet!!! Nothing happened. No red flag!!

                Prove me wrong!!

                Comment


                • NSAC PROHIBITED ACTS; DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS

                  "NAC 467.850 Administration or use of alcohol, stimulants, drugs or injections; urinalysis or chemical tests; disciplinary action. (NRS 467.030)


                  f) With the exception of stimulants listed in section S-5 and S-6 of the World Anti-Doping Agency’s Prohibited List, which are to be prohibited at all times, any prohibited substance or method drug identified on the most current edition of the Prohibited List published by the World Anti-Doping Agency (“WADA”), which is hereby adopted by reference. The most current edition of the Prohibited List may be obtained, free of charge, at the Internet address www.wada-ama.org. WADA’s definitions, prohibited lists, prohibited methodologies and tolerance levels will be used in interpreting violations of NAC 467.850 et.seq.


                  e. Avoiding testing/detection/ urine sample adulterated, not from athlete or not of human origin, adulterants, drugs (including
                  diuretics) used as masking agents:




                  So it clearly states here that NSAC, follows the guidelines of WADA rules prohibited lists. Masking agents such as Saline is prohibited.

                  Since NSAC violated their own rule by allowing Saline by giving off TUE to floyd even if they were only notified 3 weeks after the match, when it should have been 7 days before a match. - red flag

                  It also shows here that an athlete violating this has to be punished. Seems to me Floyd's punishment for using illegal saline though iv infusion is to give him a TUE or a cloak of invincibility from a violation he has committed under the Wada banned substance rule that NSAC follows. Shady indeed.

                  - RED FLAG

                  Last edited by Spoon23; 03-18-2016, 02:02 AM.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Spoon23 View Post
                    NSAC PROHIBITED ACTS; DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS

                    "NAC 467.850 Administration or use of alcohol, stimulants, drugs or injections; urinalysis or chemical tests; disciplinary action. (NRS 467.030)


                    f) With the exception of stimulants listed in section S-5 and S-6 of the World Anti-Doping Agency’s Prohibited List, which are to be prohibited at all times, any prohibited substance or method drug identified on the most current edition of the Prohibited List published by the World Anti-Doping Agency (“WADA”), which is hereby adopted by reference. The most current edition of the Prohibited List may be obtained, free of charge, at the Internet address www.wada-ama.org. WADA’s definitions, prohibited lists, prohibited methodologies and tolerance levels will be used in interpreting violations of NAC 467.850 et.seq.


                    e. Avoiding testing/detection/ urine sample adulterated, not from athlete or not of human origin, adulterants, drugs (including
                    diuretics) used as masking agents:




                    So it clearly states here that NSAC, follows the guidelines of WADA rules prohibited lists. Masking agents such as Saline is prohibited.

                    Since NSAC violated their own rule by allowing saline by giving off TUE to floyd even if they were only notified 3 weeks after the match, when it should have been 7 days before a match. - red flag

                    It also shows here that an athlete violating this has to be punished. Seems to me Floyd's punishment for using illegal saline and vitamins is to give him a TUE and a cloak of invincibility from a violation he has just committed under Wada banned substance rule that NSAC follows as well.

                    - red flag

                    Bigger red flag, nothing has happened.. Take your complaints to NSAC!!!! Logic would dictate that??? Right!!!

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Zaroku View Post
                      Bad logic!!

                      Bob & manny already sued Floyd. Yet still after losing the law suit got the first fight!
                      Inspite of being sued, and losing, and paying a large amount of money...
                      Floyd made the fight.

                      Think before you reply.

                      Floyd was sued by Manny for character defamation, yet later on, Floyd wanted the fight so it happened... Agreed?? This is kinda universally accepted!!

                      So suddenly pAC& Co were worried about killing a rematch???

                      Hahahahahahaha
                      This is silly

                      Did the fight happen right away? Nope.
                      The only reason it happened was that time made it happen. The lawsuit happened, they fought, agreed to a settlement, Floyd apologized, Manny got KOd, Floyd thought Manny was finally beatable then 5+ years later, it finally happened.


                      Time is no longer on their side for all that drama.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP