Mayweather's IV injection (Master thread)

[ADP02]

Nothing is ever certain. But this, isn't really an issue, like the false flag gulf of Tonkin incident that never happened. Freddy Roach said it was not a big deal. He had no issues with it.

Remember, big Bob Arum sued Floyd for less... And won!!

Now, would Bob crucify Floyd if there was an actual actionable issue(lawsuit worthy) ???

Yes he would. Bob would sue, quickly.. Why can't people understand simple things..

Bob would sue Floyd if he could... He did before..

Your points of view are moot... Bob being a lawyer would have had them adjudicated by this point..

If you gotta look up adjudicated... Talk to someone else

No way Bob would sue.

Bob, Manny, Roach wanted a rematch with Floyd. Lots of money was in play. Manny's injury kinda killed that but its still possible that Floyd comes back to try for number 50.

[Zaroku]

No way Bob would sue.

Bob, Manny, Roach wanted a rematch with Floyd. Lots of money was in play. Manny's injury kinda killed that but its still possible that Floyd comes back to try for number 50.

Bad logic!!

Bob & manny already sued Floyd. Yet still after losing the law suit got the first fight!
Inspite of being sued, and losing, and paying a large amount of money...
Floyd made the fight.

Think before you reply.

Floyd was sued by Manny for character defamation, yet later on, Floyd wanted the fight so it happened... Agreed?? This is kinda universally accepted!!

So suddenly pAC& Co were worried about killing a rematch???

Hahahahahahaha
This is silly

[Spoon23]

NAC 467.558 The****utic use exemptions must be approved by the Commission (NRS 467.030)
1.
All applications for a the****utic use exemption must be submitted and approved by the Commission at least 7 days in advance of any contest if practicable or immediately upon prescribed need before the contest.

Isn't it that Nsac was advices 3 weeks after the contest?

No where near 7 days in advance of a contest?

- RED FLAG

[Spoon23]

NAC 467.528 Physical examination required at weigh-in. (NRS 467.030)


BELOW IS A HINT OF WHEN FLOYD USED HIS IV!!!
************************************************** ********

2.
An unarmed combatant must report to the Commission or Executive Director any infusions, medical treatment, outpatient treatment, or hospital admission that takes place after the weigh-in and prior to the contest.


So any infusion must be reported to the commission after the weigh-in..

So does that mean 3 weeks after the weigh-in will suffice? Or isn't that too late already? Shouldn't it be before the boxing match ever takes place. I believe that's what it meant. Not 3 weeks after.

-RED FLAG

[Zaroku]

NAC 467.528 Physical examination required at weigh-in. (NRS 467.030)


BELOW IS A HINT OF WHEN FLOYD USED HIS IV!!!
************************************************** ********

2.
An unarmed combatant must report to the Commission or Executive Director any infusions, medical treatment, outpatient treatment, or hospital admission that takes place after the weigh-in and prior to the contest.


So any infusion must be reported to the commission after the weigh-in..

So does that mean 3 weeks after the weigh-in will suffice? Or isn't that too late already? Shouldn't it be before the boxing match ever takes place. I believe that's what it meant. Not 3 weeks after.

-RED FLAG

Yet.. YET nothing happened. It is over. Let's talk about doctors never doing UN needed surgeries!!! Come on!!

Dude get real!

[Zaroku]

NAC 467.558 The****utic use exemptions must be approved by the Commission (NRS 467.030)
1.
All applications for a the****utic use exemption must be submitted and approved by the Commission at least 7 days in advance of any contest if practicable or immediately upon prescribed need before the contest.

Isn't it that Nsac was advices 3 weeks after the contest?

No where near 7 days in advance of a contest?

- RED FLAG

Yet!!! Nothing happened. No red flag!!

Prove me wrong!!

[Spoon23]

NSAC PROHIBITED ACTS; DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS

"NAC 467.850 Administration or use of alcohol, stimulants, drugs or injections; urinalysis or chemical tests; disciplinary action. (NRS 467.030)


f) With the exception of stimulants listed in section S-5 and S-6 of the World Anti-Doping Agency’s Prohibited List, which are to be prohibited at all times, any prohibited substance or method drug identified on the most current edition of the Prohibited List published by the World Anti-Doping Agency (“WADA”), which is hereby adopted by reference. The most current edition of the Prohibited List may be obtained, free of charge, at the Internet address www.wada-ama.org. WADA’s definitions, prohibited lists, prohibited methodologies and tolerance levels will be used in interpreting violations of NAC 467.850 et.seq.


e. Avoiding testing/detection/ urine sample adulterated, not from athlete or not of human origin, adulterants, drugs (including
diuretics) used as masking agents:




So it clearly states here that NSAC, follows the guidelines of WADA rules prohibited lists. Masking agents such as Saline is prohibited.

Since NSAC violated their own rule by allowing Saline by giving off TUE to floyd even if they were only notified 3 weeks after the match, when it should have been 7 days before a match. - red flag

It also shows here that an athlete violating this has to be punished. Seems to me Floyd's punishment for using illegal saline though iv infusion is to give him a TUE or a cloak of invincibility from a violation he has committed under the Wada banned substance rule that NSAC follows. Shady indeed.

- RED FLAG

[Zaroku]

NSAC PROHIBITED ACTS; DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS

"NAC 467.850 Administration or use of alcohol, stimulants, drugs or injections; urinalysis or chemical tests; disciplinary action. (NRS 467.030)


f) With the exception of stimulants listed in section S-5 and S-6 of the World Anti-Doping Agency’s Prohibited List, which are to be prohibited at all times, any prohibited substance or method drug identified on the most current edition of the Prohibited List published by the World Anti-Doping Agency (“WADA”), which is hereby adopted by reference. The most current edition of the Prohibited List may be obtained, free of charge, at the Internet address www.wada-ama.org. WADA’s definitions, prohibited lists, prohibited methodologies and tolerance levels will be used in interpreting violations of NAC 467.850 et.seq.


e. Avoiding testing/detection/ urine sample adulterated, not from athlete or not of human origin, adulterants, drugs (including
diuretics) used as masking agents:




So it clearly states here that NSAC, follows the guidelines of WADA rules prohibited lists. Masking agents such as Saline is prohibited.

Since NSAC violated their own rule by allowing saline by giving off TUE to floyd even if they were only notified 3 weeks after the match, when it should have been 7 days before a match. - red flag

It also shows here that an athlete violating this has to be punished. Seems to me Floyd's punishment for using illegal saline and vitamins is to give him a TUE and a cloak of invincibility from a violation he has just committed under Wada banned substance rule that NSAC follows as well.

- red flag

Bigger red flag, nothing has happened.. Take your complaints to NSAC!!!! Logic would dictate that??? Right!!!

[ADP02]

Bad logic!!

Bob & manny already sued Floyd. Yet still after losing the law suit got the first fight!
Inspite of being sued, and losing, and paying a large amount of money...
Floyd made the fight.

Think before you reply.

Floyd was sued by Manny for character defamation, yet later on, Floyd wanted the fight so it happened... Agreed?? This is kinda universally accepted!!

So suddenly pAC& Co were worried about killing a rematch???

Hahahahahahaha
This is silly

Did the fight happen right away? Nope.
The only reason it happened was that time made it happen. The lawsuit happened, they fought, agreed to a settlement, Floyd apologized, Manny got KOd, Floyd thought Manny was finally beatable then 5+ years later, it finally happened.


Time is no longer on their side for all that drama.

[ADP02]

NSAC PROHIBITED ACTS; DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS

"NAC 467.850 Administration or use of alcohol, stimulants, drugs or injections; urinalysis or chemical tests; disciplinary action. (NRS 467.030)


f) With the exception of stimulants listed in section S-5 and S-6 of the World Anti-Doping Agency’s Prohibited List, which are to be prohibited at all times, any prohibited substance or method drug identified on the most current edition of the Prohibited List published by the World Anti-Doping Agency (“WADA”), which is hereby adopted by reference. The most current edition of the Prohibited List may be obtained, free of charge, at the Internet address www.wada-ama.org. WADA’s definitions, prohibited lists, prohibited methodologies and tolerance levels will be used in interpreting violations of NAC 467.850 et.seq.


e. Avoiding testing/detection/ urine sample adulterated, not from athlete or not of human origin, adulterants, drugs (including
diuretics) used as masking agents:




So it clearly states here that NSAC, follows the guidelines of WADA rules prohibited lists. Masking agents such as Saline is prohibited.

Since NSAC violated their own rule by allowing saline by giving off TUE to floyd even if they were only notified 3 weeks after the match, when it should have been 7 days before a match. - red flag

It also shows here that an athlete violating this has to be punished. Seems to me Floyd's punishment for using illegal saline though iv infusion is to give him a TUE and a cloak of invincibility from a violation he has just committed under Wada banned substance rule that NSAC follows as well.

- red flag

I got a draft with updates that NSAC plans on making. They had found everything Floyd/USADA did unacceptable and making sure that even a Floyd fan can understand it.

NSAC calls a retroactive TUE ..... BS because it bans it altogether.