Comments Thread For: Hauser Hits Back at USADA Over Mayweather/IV Scandal

[b00g13man]

Read what? is this supposed to be your argument?

"In cases where IV infusions/injections are deemed medically necessary, good medical practice must ensure that: 1) a clear, well-justified diagnosis has been established; 2) no non-prohibited alternative treatment exists; 3) this treatment will not enhance performance other than to return the athlete to a normal state of health; 4) the treatment is administered by qualified medical personnel in an appropriate medical setting; and 5) adequate medical records of the treatment are maintained. Athletes and support personnel administering IV infusions which cannot be medically justified are committing an anti-doping rule violation (ADRV) whether or not the individual substances are prohibited. In such cases, both the athlete and the personnel administering the IV infusion may be sanctioned.

In reference to the bold

1. Was it medically necessary? No proof.
2. Did they test he was severely dehydrated, at a clinic? nope
3. Was it administered in a clinic, nope in his home
4. Medically justified, nope, also broke the WADA rules
5. NSAC are the only ones that can sanction the IV, USADA permitted it anyway

Really don't know what your point is, other than trying to protect Floyd

They've obviously allowed it for a reason. I'm not a medical professional, nor do I work for USADA, so I'm not in a position to know. I'm fairly confident you aren't either. Unless I'm wrong, and you've got some actual proof of something..... If so, do make it public.

[ganthet]

According to USADA, he informed them, got tested, took the IV solution then got tested afterwards. The TUE was then granted retroactively. Here are their rules for that just in case you missed it the last time.

The f@ck is this? It's clearly stated on the link you gave that the TUE must be granted first before it can be applied. Don't go make up your own interpretations. The rule in writing was clear and concise. Go take your own made up interpretation of the rule somewhere else.

[b00g13man]

LMAO R.I.P. b00g13man

Thank you for the link that kills yours and the rest of the Froid **** riders arguments and even implicates Froid the 48*-0 God of yours even further

You need reading lessons, just like Floyd. Get on it.

[b00g13man]

The f@ck is this? It's clearly stated on the link you gave that the TUE must be granted first before it can be applied. Don't go make up your own interpretations. The rule in writing was clear and concise. Go take your own made up interpretation of the rule somewhere else.

You might want to invest in a dictionary, and search for the definition of "retroactive". I know it's a big word, but don't let that put you off.

[ganthet]

You need reading lessons, just like Floyd. Get on it.

LMAO yeah sure I'm the one who needs reading lessons when you're the one who can't comprehend (most likely trying to act dumb to protect your God Froid) that the TUE must BOTH be applied for and GRANTED before it can go into effect

[b00g13man]

LMAO yeah sure I'm the one who needs reading lessons when you're the one who can't comprehend (most likely trying to act dumb to protect your God Froid) that the TUE must BOTH be applied for and GRANTED before it can go into effect

You might want to invest in a dictionary, and search for the definition of "retroactive". I know it's a big word, but don't let that put you off.

Oh, do you need me to tell you what a dictionary is?

[ganthet]

You might want to invest in a dictionary, and search for the definition of "retroactive". I know it's a big word, but don't let that put you off.

LMAO are you serious? You're just zoning out on that one word "retroactive" and completely disregarding the entire explanation on USADAs site? Hey the word retroactive is there, that means, it can be applied retroactively even if it wasn't granted yet LOL

Just in case you really are that dumb, I'll explain it to you:

1) Fighter gets an emergency medical condition
2) Doctor says you need to take this, but this will probably f@ck up your drug tests and make you seem to be using something
3) Fighter applies for TUE
4) Application for TUE gets approved (if there really is no other alternative treatment)
5) Fighter goes to hospital and gets the infusion
6) Fighter gets tested
7) Fighters test results come back positive for illegal crap
8) TUE takes effect

None of those things happened in Froids case except no. 7 and 8. So bye

[tokon]

This whole "retroactive approval" bullsh8t is very suspect.

Even more su****ious is why, if USDA knew/suspected that IV had been used after the weigh-in, was this not reported to NSAC immediately?

[baCCaT]

They've obviously allowed it for a reason. I'm not a medical professional, nor do I work for USADA, so I'm not in a position to know. I'm fairly confident you aren't either. Unless I'm wrong, and you've got some actual proof of something..... If so, do make it public.

hahaha! just toying with your response. no offense meant!

[HeroBando]

According to USADA, he informed them, got tested, took the IV solution then got tested afterwards. The TUE was then granted retroactively. Here are their rules for that just in case you missed it the last time.



If I had to guess, option b would make the most sense.

Having posted that, have you got some evidence that the series of events didn't occur in the order USADA stated? If you do, I'd like to see it.

That's their general policy on Tue, but clearly its more stringent on IV rehydration since the fcuking bolded the requirement for prior TUE approval. Just read the fcuking link you posted, couldn't be more clear. You need rehydrating, drink some liquids. You need to flush drugs out of your system, you go IV