Not Every Banned Substance Is A PED.

[Ahmed_Ismail]

All the information is in that SI article, I suggest you read it.



You won't like what you're going to read.



Floyd must've been severely dehydrated to need that much saline, or he could be trying to flush his system.

Already read it, he said that when USADA got to Mayweather's house they were told that he already had an IV, which contradicts with what USADA and NSAC said in May

http://newscentral.exsees.com/item/e3ffb96d60055131c06893519d278f88-73b16d0c9923de03ca54c4a4cfcd2af5

They said in this article that Mayweather applied for and was granted the TUE and the whole thing was being overseen by USADA, he didn't do it before USADA got to his home or without their knowledge, all that stuff they said about he was granted permission 3 weeks after the fight is not true (according to this article that came out in May), which makes more sense since they didn't wait 4 months to publish that. The same article was also on boxingscene but i couldn't find it.

[-Hyperion-]

But again I'll just wait till USADA and NSAC address this, u can't take a reporter's word for it.

if you could read, you'd know NSAC already did. Called USADA's method unacceptable and basically threw them under the boss hoping their cash cow Mayweather can get off scot free...


It's disgraceful that the NSAC says USADA had no right to grant Mayweather a TUE, but if the TUE shouldn't have been given why isn't the fight a No Contest already?, Corruption.

[Beercules]

Already read it, he said that when USADA got to Mayweather's house they were told that he already had an IV, which contradicts with what USADA and NSAC said in May

http://newscentral.exsees.com/item/e3ffb96d60055131c06893519d278f88-73b16d0c9923de03ca54c4a4cfcd2af5

They said in this article that Mayweather applied for and was granted the TUE and the whole thing was being overseen by USADA, he didn't do it before USADA got to his home or without their knowledge, all that stuff they said about he was granted permission 3 weeks after the fight is not true (according to this article that came out in May), which makes more sense since they didn't wait 4 months to publish that. The same article was also on boxingscene but i couldn't find it.

http://www.sbnation.com/longform/2015/9/9/9271811/can-boxing-trust-usada

[Ahmed_Ismail]

if you could read, you'd know NSAC already did. Called USADA's method unacceptable and basically threw them under the boss hoping their cash cow Mayweather can get off scot free...


It's disgraceful that the NSAC says USADA had no right to grant Mayweather a TUE, but if the TUE shouldn't have been given why isn't the fight a No Contest already?, Corruption.

Read my last post, USADA (according to an article that came out in May) granted and actually oversaw the TUE BEFORE the fight, and whether this was right or wrong by USADA, Mayweather didn't break any rules according to USADA or NSAC, they told him it was legal and he did it in front of them.

Interesting to see what NSAC and USADA will say about this.

[Ahmed_Ismail]

http://www.sbnation.com/longform/201...ng-trust-usada

So what now? Are we going to get into a war of articles?

Take this

http://newscentral.exsees.com/item/e3ffb96d60055131c06893519d278f88-73b16d0c9923de03ca54c4a4cfcd2af5

TUE was ovverseen by USADA.

[madsweeney]

So what now? Are we going to get into a war of articles?

Take this

http://newscentral.exsees.com/item/e3ffb96d60055131c06893519d278f88-73b16d0c9923de03ca54c4a4cfcd2af5

TUE was ovverseen by USADA.

USADA granted the TUE, NSAC is claiming they are testing agency and not authorized to grant exceptions.

Also that ****** link you guys keep posting is consistant with the information Hauser provided in his article (and Iole's post that it borrows from) are dated May 22nd and do not mention when the TUE was requested/granted. In his article, Hauser claims NSAC and Top Rank confirm that TUE was requested on 19th and granted on 20th. So where is this contradiction of information?

[Build That Wall]

So what now? Are we going to get into a war of articles?

Take this

http://newscentral.exsees.com/item/e3ffb96d60055131c06893519d278f88-73b16d0c9923de03ca54c4a4cfcd2af5

TUE was ovverseen by USADA.

Good Stuff.

[madsweeney]

Good Stuff.

By good stuff you mean useless article (lack of details) and due to posting date is consistent with Hauser's story?

[-Hyperion-]

Guy didnt even read his own article....none of it condraticts Houser.

What Kevin Iole does it to report, Thomas Hauser did journalism and actually questioned the official story. Which is why he got an admittance from NSAC that USADA had no right to grant the TUE.

[Build That Wall]

By good stuff you mean useless article (lack of details) and due to posting date is consistent with Hauser's story?

I'm talking about to the link of the Yahoo article. I mean good stuff because it is clear hauser is trying to spin **** and twist it up to cause controversy. Hauser is full of ****.