Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Wilder is Warned By Scott That Duhaupas is No Joke

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by It's Ovah View Post
    This makes it official. The Scott fight was a dive.
    The WBC took a dive before the fight even happened.

    Putting Scott into a final eliminator for their title when he had just been KO'd by Chisora was corrupt as fuck.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Levity View Post
      Pretty bad logic here. Boxing is about levels and giving EBU level guys like Teper and Pianeta some issues in losses hardly suggests that Duhaupas would at least do the same to better fighters.
      That's pretty much the same level Wilder has been fighting at if not better. Wilder best win in Stivern whoses best win is Arreola who doesn't even have a best win.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by SilverMiles View Post
        That's pretty much the same level Wilder has been fighting at if not better. Wilder best win in Stivern whoses best win is Arreola who doesn't even have a best win.
        Arreola is trash too haha his fatass can't even commit to boxing.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by glenn mcrory View Post
          Yeah. That sucks...

          He literally has no shame.
          First Scipio... I mean Malik Scott not only goes to the trouble of pretending to be "knocked out" by a slap, he then proceeds to try to unabashedly sell this as a not absolutely laughable fight and a completely embarrassing farce.
          It was hardly a "slap" he was blasted right to the temple.

          How many first round KOs does Wilder have? The "dive" talk was nonsense. Scott would have made a ton more money to go win the title against Stiverne and make a mint that way. Scott taking a dive makes zero sense period..

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by diarraisagod View Post
            I don't think Wilder has proved he is better yet.

            He has a belt but his resume is a joke, there's only 1 name on it that you give any credit for beating.

            This French guy coming off a win against Charr is a better opponent than we usually get from Wilder. If it wasn't for his belt, that's the level Wilder belongs at at the moment.
            When Povetkin beat Charr, Charr was a monster world-beater who would have KOd Ali, Tyson, and Lewis in their primes. Wilder-haters simply defy belief..

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by BWC View Post
              When Povetkin beat Charr, Charr was a monster world-beater who would have KOd Ali, Tyson, and Lewis in their primes. Wilder-haters simply defy belief..
              Nope. No one ever said Charr amazing and he further looks even worse now as he lost his last 2 out of 3 and KTFO in his most recent.

              As for Duhaupas, he lost this year. Why can't Wilder fight the guy who beat him? Teper is undefeated at least so it would look good on paper and he poses little to no threat. Absolutely no reason at all to fight Duhaupas, it serves no purpose and further shows how poor PBC matchmaking is.

              Comment


              • #17
                Teper just fought man. Teper is not going to fight the WBC champ on a 2 month turnaround..

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by BWC View Post
                  Teper just fought man. Teper is not going to fight the WBC champ on a 2 month turnaround..
                  he probably would do it to fight Wilder, they also could have contacted him months ago to figure this out, it's not like Wilders date vs an unknown opponent is hugely important and set in stone. If they wanted to fight a month later or whatever they could have.

                  Tired of the excuses for Wilder. This is absolutely unacceptable for a "champion" to fight this kind of caliber opponent, especially considering he just fought Molina in his first title defense.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by ***1048;ATAS View Post
                    he probably would do it to fight Wilder, they also could have contacted him months ago to figure this out, it's not like Wilders date vs an unknown opponent is hugely important and set in stone. If they wanted to fight a month later or whatever they could have.

                    Tired of the excuses for Wilder. This is absolutely unacceptable for a "champion" to fight this kind of caliber opponent, especially considering he just fought Molina in his first title defense.
                    Did you post in here your anger when Povetkin was defending the WBA against Wawrycz and cruiserweights?

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by BWC View Post
                      Did you post in here your anger when Povetkin was defending the WBA against Wawrycz and cruiserweights?
                      That's your defense, really? Using some other fighter who fought an undefeated prospect a few years ago makes it ok for Wilder?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP