Comments Thread For: Golovkin Promoter: Lemieux Had To Be PPV To Happen

[Beater_of_ass]

Lemieux probably has the best chance vs Ggg than anyone under 168, a legit punchers chance. Belt unification is a bonus.

looks like there's a lot of interest with the casuals, and I bet there won't be buyer remorse. That's good for boxing

A guy who lost, to the guy GGG had quit in 2 rounds is PPV worthy. You literally, just said that. No matter how you spin it, it's a **** match up.

[GMAN SUPREME]

Because HBO said so? What has Lemule done exactly? A draw against Andy Lee is 100x's more impressive than a loss to Rubio.

NO it has to do with what I have seen with my own eyes as I watch how lemiuex has improved since then.for starters Lemieux has beaten guys like guerrero rosado and ndam much better than qullin did.rosado was beating qullin's ass all over the ring.lemieux isn't the same fighter he was when he fought rubio and alcine he's better now.

[HeroBando]

A guy who lost, to the guy GGG had quit in 2 rounds is PPV worthy. You literally, just said that. No matter how you spin it, it's a **** match up.

That was like 10 fights ago. Cotto got outclassed by Trout who got dropped 2x by an Aussie bouncer.

I think very few would agree with you on **** matchup. What did Virgil Hunter say about guys complaining about it, fake fans? I understand you're more of a Cotto fan than boxing in general tho

[Beater_of_ass]

NO it has to do with what I have seen with my own eyes as I watch how lemiuex has improved since then.for starters Lemieux has beaten guys like guerrero rosado and ndam much better than qullin did.rosado was beating qullin's ass all over the ring.lemieux isn't the same fighter he was when he fought rubio and alcine he's better now.

I see so your saying this fight is okay on PPV because "Hey, he's better than Quillin." BWAHAHAHA!!!!! That's what they should call the PPV, I might pay for the trolling. It's sad that's your defense though, but do what works I guess.

[UNBIASED BOXING]

A guy who lost, to the guy GGG had quit in 2 rounds is PPV worthy. You literally, just said that. No matter how you spin it, it's a **** match up.

Lemieux was dominating the early stages of the fight.

...and then he gassed out. He was 22 years old when he fought Rubio. He had a different trainer. He had inexperience, and he made the mistake many young upcoming KO-artists do: giving up too much energy for a fast KO. This fight was 4 YEARS AGO.

The Rubio who fought Golovkin was washed up and done. He was only in it for the paycheck.

Stop trying to diminish Lemieux as some crappy fighter. He's done quite well and come back as a solid fighter, as evident by his last few fights including the most recent against N'Dam. Pacquiao lost his 12th and 28th fight before he was even a big name. Hagler had a 2x losses and 1 draw by his 29th fight.





Either way, Roman G vs Vilori, Luis Ortiz vs Stiverne, and Golovkin vs Lemieux. This card will be good. 3 potential fights to end in KO. Nothing more left to say.

[ИATAS]

A guy who lost, to the guy GGG had quit in 2 rounds is PPV worthy. You literally, just said that. No matter how you spin it, it's a **** match up.

Yeah he lost 4 years ago or so, not much different than Cotto who lost to Austin Trout just a few fights back, and like Cotto, David Lemieux has looked good and entertaining since those losses. I'm sure no one would care to watch Cotto on PPV coming off back to back losses to Floyd and Austin Trout, but fortunately for both neither are coming off losses here and both have a bit of hot streaks going.

The value of the PPV is in the eyes of the beholder.

If you find value in watching:

Golovkin vs Lemieux
Roman Gonzalez vs Brian Viloria
Luis Ortiz vs. Bermane Stiverne
Tureano Johnson vs Eamonn O'Kane

Then it's a good card to order. Comparing it to a recent PPV in Pacquiao vs Mayweather, which had a horrible undercard with a price tag of $100, I definitely see value in this card. I'm ordering it because I'm a fan of entertaining fights & cards. Pretty solid if you ask me. However if you don't see value in that, quite obviously don't order it.

[GMAN SUPREME]

That was like 10 fights ago. Cotto got outclassed by Trout who got dropped 2x by an Aussie bouncer.

I think very few would agree with you on **** matchup. What did Virgil Hunter say about guys complaining about it, fake fans? I understand you're more of a Cotto fan than boxing in general tho

beater of ass should just shorten his name to ass.

[Beater_of_ass]

That was like 10 fights ago. Cotto got outclassed by Trout who got dropped 2x by an Aussie bouncer.

I think very few would agree with you on **** matchup. What did Virgil Hunter say about guys complaining about it, fake fans? I understand you're more of a Cotto fan than boxing in general tho

This is a defense now lol... Kelly Pavlik actually beat Rubio 8 years ago, he would be a better matchup than Lemule. A good fighter doesn't lose to a D class fighter at any point in their career. Ever. I know the haircut makes your p*ssy wet but have some common sense.

[ИATAS]

This is a defense now lol... Kelly Pavlik actually beat Rubio 8 years ago, he would be a better matchup than Lemule. A good fighter doesn't lose to a D class fighter at any point in their career. Ever. I know the haircut makes your p*ssy wet but have some common sense.

Ever? Hopkins lost to Clinton Mitchell. Nonito Donaire lost to Rosendo Sanchez. Henry Armstrong was KO'd by Al Iovino, lost to Eddie Trujillo and Al Greenfield. I can go on.

[UNBIASED BOXING]

Ever? Hopkins lost to Clinton Mitchell. Nonito Donaire lost to Rosendo Sanchez. Henry Armstrong was KO'd by Al Iovino, lost to Eddie Trujillo and Al Greenfield. I can go on.

Woah, dude. Calm down.

Didn't you know? Once you lose to someone who's not an all-time great you're automatically garbage and not a good fighter! It's like, you can't redeem yourself or become a better fighter, too.