Comments Thread For: Golovkin Promoter: Lemieux Had To Be PPV To Happen

[Beater_of_ass]

Did you pay for the Cotto vs Jennings PPV?

No, and you keep assuming I'm a stan lol. Cotto/Martinez... that's the only PPV I think I ever paid for with Cotto to be honest... Oh and Cotto/Manny. Other than that, it's house parties or watch it a week later.

[ИATAS]

Because when people buy **** match ups in masse, they end up on PPV not PBC. That's not good for boxing.

You're not opposing this fight because you're concerned for the well being of the sport so cut the crap amigo. I already broke down there is plenty of value in this card (which you agreed with) and it is a unification bout, which is absolutely necessary and something fans typically want to see. It's not a "****ty match up" when you get two belts unified together. It's a solid fight any way you slice it man. This isn't Cotto vs Jennings or something along those lines, this is two champions unifying.

[GMAN SUPREME]

Because when people buy **** match ups in masse, they end up on PPV not PBC. That's not good for boxing.

most of those **** match ups happen on pbc btw.more are on the way qullin vs random stripper guy LOL.

[Beater_of_ass]

most of those **** match ups happen on pbc btw.more are on the way qullin vs random stripper guy LOL.

I won't care too much unless you ask me to pay $60.

[Beater_of_ass]

You're not opposing this fight because you're concerned for the well being of the sport so cut the crap amigo. I already broke down there is plenty of value in this card (which you agreed with) and it is a unification bout, which is absolutely necessary and something fans typically want to see. It's not a "****ty match up" when you get two belts unified together. It's a solid fight any way you slice it man. This isn't Cotto vs Jennings or something along those lines, this is two champions unifying.

I never disagreed with any of that. It shouldn't be $60. If you disagree that's fine and I didn't pay for Cotto/Jennings either. I'm not sure why it was even brought up, I guess to justify GGG/Lemule for some reason?

[ИATAS]

I never disagreed with any of that. It shouldn't be $60. If you disagree that's fine and I didn't pay for Cotto/Jennings either. I'm not sure why it was even brought up, I guess to justify GGG/Lemule for some reason?

You don't have to order it, like I said if you find the value in this card order it if not don't, but don't go around telling people what they should and should not be excited for, especially when it's good fight in the division, this isn't some Latin Fury or Pinoy Pride type of PPV, this is a solid card with four meaningful fights.

[Beater_of_ass]

You don't have to order it, like I said if you find the value in this card order it if not don't, but don't go around telling people what they should and should not be excited for, especially when it's good fight in the division, this isn't some Latin Fury or Pinoy Pride type of PPV, this is a solid card with four meaningful fights.

So don't state my opinion on a forum because you disagree with it? And you're complaining about people telling you what to do lol.

[2shameless]

No problem paying for a unification bout between 2 top, exciting, powerful punching MWs, the solid under card is icing on the cake. I'll also be ordering Cotto/Canelo and Loma/Rigo, Kovalev/Ward if those fights happen this year as well.

[richardt]

If this fight goes one or two rounds, even if it is exciting, not sure people will feel they got their money's worth. Hopefully the undercard can hold up.

[mathed]

They should sell about 30k, maybe even 50k on ppv

Shoot, for $49.99 a PPV...don't be shocked if this one does great numbers. People are tired of getting ripped off and this might be a bargain too good to pass up.