Comments Thread For: Austin Trout Breaks Down Miguel Cotto vs. Canelo Alvarez

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Gentblue
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Aug 2014
    • 2428
    • 87
    • 30
    • 37,380

    #11
    Originally posted by Box Up!
    Nice first post, you're well clever. Floyd fought Canelo at 152 so Canelo BEATS HIM DOWN at 154 you ****** ****
    And he fought Lara at 155..... It goes both ways

    Comment

    • techliam
      Caneloweight Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Apr 2012
      • 5525
      • 370
      • 23
      • 42,424

      #12
      Originally posted by Justin MSalvato
      Canelo beats all at 154, except Floyd.
      Canelo cant even make 154

      Its amazing to think that arguably Trout beat both Cotto and Canelo

      Comment

      • Gary Coleman
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jul 2009
        • 3516
        • 1,044
        • 925
        • 13,777

        #13
        Originally posted by Box Up!
        Nice first post, you're well clever. Floyd fought Canelo at 152 so Canelo BEATS HIM DOWN at 154 you ****** ****
        Sure guy...

        Trout would beat Cotto again if they fought. This "resurgence of Cotto" is smoke in mirrors. He's the same fighter he's always been with a little more confidence due to these soft touches he's had.

        Comment

        • Cuauhtémoc1520
          Head Mexican in Charge
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Mar 2007
          • 20824
          • 1,666
          • 569
          • 35,996

          #14
          So a guy who actually fought Cotto, and beat him has no credibility? LOL, man the delusion is strong among the nut huggers.

          Comment

          • bigjer88
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jan 2009
            • 1129
            • 71
            • 2
            • 8,279

            #15
            Originally posted by PRBOXINGCOTTO
            trout please he didn't take you serious and he won the fight against you it was a close fight but you ran and held every time he caught you and you have not looked good since the cotto fight that's why you do not get credit
            Was a much closer fight than the scorecards had it, but Cotto did not win that fight. Trout imposed his gameplan and made adjustments, and Miguel didn't have any answers. It was a disappointing performance by Cotto, but Trout fought the fight of his life.

            True, it's been all downhill for Trout since then, but he deserves some credit. The fact that Miguel didn't take him seriously -- that's Miguel's fault. I'm sure Miguel understands that.

            Comment

            • AL_Camino
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Sep 2009
              • 2455
              • 94
              • 26
              • 20,340

              #16
              Originally posted by ELPacman
              lol, I almost forgot Trout beat Cotto until this article.

              Trout can't possibly believe Cotto was excited to fight him and "got up" for the fight, does he?

              My only hate towards that fight and forgot about was that I WAS THERE at MSG. What a waste of money. It was a group of like 6 of us and some of them weren't even into fights. Didn't help that the fight stunk pretty bad and Cotto ended up losing. Real sour taste on the ride home, lol.
              I was one of the damned

              Comment

              • Cuauhtémoc1520
                Head Mexican in Charge
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Mar 2007
                • 20824
                • 1,666
                • 569
                • 35,996

                #17
                Originally posted by bigjer88
                Was a much closer fight than the scorecards had it, but Cotto did not win that fight. Trout imposed his gameplan and made adjustments, and Miguel didn't have any answers. It was a disappointing performance by Cotto, but Trout fought the fight of his life.

                True, it's been all downhill for Trout since then, but he deserves some credit. The fact that Miguel didn't take him seriously -- that's Miguel's fault. I'm sure Miguel understands that.
                Don't buy that from these people. There's no indication that was the case. Cotto came in weight, (actually under the 154 limit) and was ready. Styles make fights and Trout's style is a difficult one for many fighters. To give you reference, Cotto came in at 155 for Martinez, so he was actually OVER for that fight.

                Trout throws tons of punches, is a lagit 154, and moves. You said it right, Cotto couldn't adjust, Canelo did. Let's give credit where credit is due.

                Does that mean Canelo beats Cotto, of course not. To take that credit away from Trout is just Cotto fans being bitter.

                Comment

                • mrcupide2
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Sep 2009
                  • 787
                  • 32
                  • 68
                  • 7,327

                  #18
                  I never seen Cotto look so ****ty at a weigh in than with Trout. Idk what was wrong with Cotto he was gased by the 8th round. If Cotto was 100 % he wouldve stopped Trout

                  Comment

                  • Cuauhtémoc1520
                    Head Mexican in Charge
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Mar 2007
                    • 20824
                    • 1,666
                    • 569
                    • 35,996

                    #19
                    Originally posted by mrcupide2
                    I never seen Cotto look so ****ty at a weigh in than with Trout. Idk what was wrong with Cotto he was gased by the 8th round. If Cotto was 100 % he wouldve stopped Trout
                    He was 100%, get over it he lost.

                    Comment

                    • bigjer88
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jan 2009
                      • 1129
                      • 71
                      • 2
                      • 8,279

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Cuauhtémoc1520
                      Don't buy that from these people. There's no indication that was the case. Cotto came in weight, (actually under the 154 limit) and was ready. Styles make fights and Trout's style is a difficult one for many fighters. To give you reference, Cotto came in at 155 for Martinez, so he was actually OVER for that fight.

                      Trout throws tons of punches, is a lagit 154, and moves. You said it right, Cotto couldn't adjust, Canelo did. Let's give credit where credit is due.

                      Does that mean Canelo beats Cotto, of course not. To take that credit away from Trout is just Cotto fans being bitter.
                      I pretty much agree with everything you said here, but what makes me think that Cotto didn't really get up for the Trout fight is that Cotto didn't have a Plan B -- in fact, he didn't really seem to have a Plan A.

                      But that should not take away from Trout's performance. He outfought and outhought Cotto. He clearly deserved the victory. I'm a huge Cotto fan, but Trout deserves props.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP