Comments Thread For: Cotto Backs Adviser's Position on Canelo Rematch Clause

[MrRolltide91]

Cotto wants to be Floyd's #50 so he doesn't want to box himself into a rematch clause.

good point

[PRBOXINGCOTTO]

Cotto is doing the business first he will beat canelo up in November and if no rematch delahoya would have to pay more to get cotto back in the ring plus cotto has big money options after this fight so canelo stop being a ***** and sign since your so confident

[el malo]

Team Cotto or Team Canelo , What rematch clause? You have a mandatory challenge that was set 3 months back by time Canelo/Coto & GGG/Lemieux fight that will be 6 months into the mandatory , leaving 3 month for winners to fight each other so what's this rematch stuff about?

Team canelo wants a rematch clause and team cotto don't because if the fight is good the rematch could happen without a clause.

Team canelo also said they aint moving up to middleweight anytime soon (even though they been fighting at 155 which is middleweight lol).

Is team canelo avoiding to have to fight GGG next if they beat cotto? Sounds fishy. Team cotto is leaving all options open like it should be.

[TheStranger]

No rematch clause! They should have fought in June instead of their cherry picks if they wanted to fight twice. Now Canelo said he'd fight Gennady Golovkin after beating Cotto and that's what I want to see him try it.

[Chuckguy]

Easy to understand, impossible to believe.

When a genuine star refuses to sign a fight for financial reasons, they go and sign an opponent who will pay more..... when Golovkin refuses, he goes and signs Willie Monroe.

With Golovkin its not about the money, its about the easier fight.

Golovkin did not ask for more money for Ward, he asked for a catchweight.

Get your excuses straight.

Golovkin was willing to fight Froch/Chavez NOW !..... not later, after {insert excuse here}.

Again ******!
Both Froch (in UK) and Chavez jr bring way more
MONEY than Ward anywhere!
Did Floyd need a CW against Canelo? No
Did manny need one against Cotto? No
Did you bi tch about those? Most likely not.
I'm done explaining the simple logic behind the GGG plan
A ****** like you will never understand

[Dle]

The 'Trojan' rematch clause. Guarantees the winner doesn't fight the mandatory GGG. This Allows them to *****foot around until GGG becomes beat or exposed.

[Fetta]

If fight is good they'll rematch, if its not then why bother. I get it but always thought rematch clauses were the norm.

[Raonic]

Makes sense to me. Who wouldn't want a rematch clause in a big money 50/50 fight like this?

[Raonic]

Though if it was Cotto facing a dangerous opponent, there's literally no chance he allows a rematch clause to the other guy.

[raymosr]

as a supporter, but current hater, of ggg I hope this fight does not happen..
fact of the matter is cotto will outbox the mess out of canelo...and after that ggg gets no credit for crucifying cotto...but if this fight does not happen ggg will get a canelo win in the next year or so when he moves up..lots of ppl wont beat canelo, and oscar will protect him, but cotto and GGG will..i hope ggg has first crack at it, bc im tired of having to defend yet bash his poor resume

SO SCREW THIS FIGHT

Well tell grandfather G to fight Ward .