Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Cotto Backs Adviser's Position on Canelo Rematch Clause

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Malgus View Post
    This is really going to piss you off, .

    Cotto vs. Mayorga PPV attendance: 7,247

    Source: http://www.f1ghtn3ws.com/Boxing/more...-mayorga-78295 (Change the 1 to an "i" and 3 to an "e")

    Canelo vs. Angulo PPV attendance: 14,610

    Source: http://espn.go.com/boxing/story/_/id...tko-10th-round

    Cotto vs. Trout attendance: 13,096

    Source: http://espn.go.com/boxing/story/_/id...k-streak-upset

    Canelo vs. Lopez attendance: 14,519

    *And Canelo pulled that attendance with Chavez Jr. vs. Martinez going on at the same time down the street*

    Source: http://www.badlefthook.com/2012/9/17...me-boxing-news

    Let's compare competition ...who's fight the hardest fighters ...in their prime ...90 percent of canelo fights were bums ...famous boxers garbage brothers or dam 40 like Shane and baldomir ...while canelo was getting his hand held like a bbbbiiiuaaatttcchhh cotto was fighter prime fighters margacheato , yuri foreman, Shane , Judah , margacheato, PAC, Paulie and more ...plus gave Floyd a better fight than canelo ...canelo act like he's a great beating up c fighter Kirkland don't make you great ...he fought 2 big opponents ...Floyd easily beat him and Lara was robbed

    Comment


    • Seeing as Oscar flat out said they don't have to discuss a rematch unless it's a great fight, this sounds like made up nonsense. Oscar isn't trying to negotiate a rematch so what is the real hold up?

      Comment


      • WARRR COTTO.....Dela Hoya is the diva!!!!

        Comment


        • Unless the fight turned out one sided, either way, both would be happy with a rematch because it would keep them away from Golovkin. Nobody is unbeatable, including GGG, but there's no doubt other middleweights aren't rushing to face him. Action in this fabled division could really open up if Lemieux is able to put a dent in Gennady, and I hope he can for that reason, plus I'm sure he's got the mindset to give it a big try, but imo Golovkin is likely to impose himself in a manner that will make rival claimants at 160 even more reluctant to take him on.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Bep3373 View Post
            Let's compare competition ...who's fight the hardest fighters ...in their prime ...90 percent of canelo fights were bums ...famous boxers garbage brothers or dam 40 like Shane and baldomir ...while canelo was getting his hand held like a bbbbiiiuaaatttcchhh cotto was fighter prime fighters margacheato , yuri foreman, Shane , Judah , margacheato, PAC, Paulie and more ...plus gave Floyd a better fight than canelo ...canelo act like he's a great beating up c fighter Kirkland don't make you great ...he fought 2 big opponents ...Floyd easily beat him and Lara was robbed
            LMAO crippled *** Foreman? I never knew fighting a dude with a knee brace coming off of knee surgery was someone in their prime

            Comment


            • anything to avoid a fight with gennady golovkin is a good idea for these guys. a rematch clause is smart. i can definitely see it.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by New England View Post
                anything to avoid a fight with gennady golovkin is a good idea for these guys. a rematch clause is smart. i can definitely see it.
                GGG has to find a big payday else where now.

                Comment


                • this rematch clause makes no sense. Cotto is right about this one.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Bardock View Post
                    LMAO crippled *** Foreman? I never knew fighting a dude with a knee brace coming off of knee surgery was someone in their prime
                    I thought Foreman's surgery was after their fight. Did he have a procedure before it as well?

                    No reason to bring Foreman's religion into it...and no need to use it as a pejorative.
                    Last edited by bigjer88; 08-06-2015, 09:35 AM. Reason: Punctuation

                    Comment


                    • What's wrong with a rematch clause...?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP